IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4117-d1079089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Melting the Psychological Boundary: How Interactive and Sensory Affordance Influence Users’ Adoption of Digital Heritage Service

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwei Jia

    (School of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Han Li

    (School of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Meimei Jiang

    (School of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Liang Wu

    (State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)

Abstract

As a result of the post-pandemic situation, enhancing digital heritage services has become one of the key issues for the recovery of tourism. Disruptive innovation in human–computer interaction technology has brought new opportunities for digitalization and intelligent transformation in the contemporary cultural tourism industry. Existing research on the adoption behavior of digital heritage services primarily focuses on users’ assessments of behavior results. There is a considerable gap in research about the interaction and value co-creation between users and digital intelligence services and users’ cognitive construction logic of digital heritage services. Following reciprocal determinism, we propose a conceptual model to deconstruct the detailed transmission path of interactive affordance and sensory affordance to digital heritage adoption. In Study 1, a lab experiment in an AI-assisted smart screen digital heritage service context revealed that interactive affordance and user adoption of digital heritage services were partially mediated by psychological distance. Findings from a between-subject online experiment in Study 2 confirmed that embodied cognition and psychological distance play a parallel intermediary role in the impact of sensory affordance on adoption. In Study 3, a lab experiment in a VR-based digital museum context further verified that information overload moderates the influence of embodied cognition on psychological distance. This research reveals the deep-bounded, rational decision-making logic of digital heritage service adoption and provides significant practical enlightenment for the optimization of the affordance experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwei Jia & Han Li & Meimei Jiang & Liang Wu, 2023. "Melting the Psychological Boundary: How Interactive and Sensory Affordance Influence Users’ Adoption of Digital Heritage Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4117-:d:1079089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 2020. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2067-2086, October.
    2. Jaione Korro Bañuelos & Álvaro Rodríguez Miranda & José Manuel Valle-Melón & Ainara Zornoza-Indart & Manuel Castellano-Román & Roque Angulo-Fornos & Francisco Pinto-Puerto & Pilar Acosta Ibáñez & Patr, 2021. "The Role of Information Management for the Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Ha-Won Jang & Soo-Bum Lee, 2021. "The Relationship between Contact-Free Services, Social and Personal Norms, and Customers’ Behavior for the Sustainable Management of the Restaurant Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Wolfgang Ulaga & Andreas Eggert, 2006. "Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business-to-business relationships," Post-Print hal-00482522, HAL.
    5. Schick, Allen G. & Gordon, Lawrence A. & Haka, Susan, 1990. "Information overload: A temporal approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 199-220.
    6. Hu, Han-fen & Krishen, Anjala S., 2019. "When is enough, enough? Investigating product reviews and information overload from a consumer empowerment perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 27-37.
    7. Russell Belk, 2021. "Ethical issues in service robotics and artificial intelligence," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(13-14), pages 860-876, October.
    8. Ye, Xiaoyin & Guo, Zhaoyang & Ye, Jun, 2020. "The effect of the synchrony experience on product evaluation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 247-258.
    9. Javornik, Ana, 2016. "Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 252-261.
    10. Darke, Peter R. & Brady, Michael K. & Benedicktus, Ray L. & Wilson, Andrew E., 2016. "Feeling Close From Afar: The Role of Psychological Distance in Offsetting Distrust in Unfamiliar Online Retailers," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 287-299.
    11. Yan, Ruihe & Gong, Xiang, 2022. "Peer-to-peer accommodation platform affordance: Scale development and empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 922-938.
    12. Laing, Jennifer & Wheeler, Fiona & Reeves, Keir & Frost, Warwick, 2014. "Assessing the experiential value of heritage assets: A case study of a Chinese heritage precinct, Bendigo, Australia," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 180-192.
    13. David V. Boivin & Olivier Boiral, 2022. "So Close, Yet So Far Away: Exploring the Role of Psychological Distance from Climate Change on Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Gallarza, Martina G. & Maubisson, Laurent & Rivière, Arnaud, 2021. "Replicating consumer value scales: A comparative study of EVS and PERVAL at a cultural heritage site," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 614-623.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chien-Tai Hsu & Yi-Chun Lin & Kai-Chao Yao & Pei-Chi Ma, 2024. "A Study on the Performance of B&B Operations Is Conducted in Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    2. Uhm, Jun-Phil & Kim, Sanghoon & Do, Chanwook & Lee, Hyun-Woo, 2022. "How augmented reality (AR) experience affects purchase intention in sport E-commerce: Roles of perceived diagnosticity, psychological distance, and perceived risks," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Pizzi, Gabriele & Scarpi, Daniele, 2020. "Privacy threats with retail technologies: A consumer perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Janina Seutter & Kristin Kutzner & Maren Stadtländer & Dennis Kundisch & Ralf Knackstedt, 2023. "“Sorry, too much information”—Designing online review systems that support information search and processing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    6. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2019. "The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 661-679, December.
    7. Carter, Kealy & Jayachandran, Satish & Murdock, Mitchel R., 2021. "Building A Sustainable Shelf: The Role of Firm Sustainability Reputation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 507-522.
    8. Maria Fuentes-Blasco & Beatriz Moliner-Velázquez & Irene Gil-Saura, 2017. "Latent segmentation in business-to-business based on information and communication technology and relationship variables," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 460-468, March.
    9. Massimiliano Celli & Simona Arduini & Tommaso Beck, 2024. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and His Future Application Scenario for Italian SMEs," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(4), pages 1-44, July.
    10. Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & Freeman, Susan, 2009. "Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, February.
    11. Chen, Clara Xiaoling & Lill, Jeremy B. & Lucianetti, Lorenzo, 2023. "Performance measurement system diversity and product innovation: Evidence from longitudinal survey data," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    12. Stocks, Morris H. & Harrell, Adrian, 1995. "The impact of an increase in accounting information level on the judgment quality of individuals and groups," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(7-8), pages 685-700.
    13. Manuel Rodríguez-Díaz & Rosa Rodríguez-Díaz & Tomás F. Espino-Rodríguez, 2018. "Analysis of the Online Reputation Based on Customer Ratings of Lodgings in Tourism Destinations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Joerß, Tom & Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Akbar, Payam, 2021. "Digitalization as solution to environmental problems? When users rely on augmented reality-recommendation agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 510-523.
    15. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Leonidas C. Leonidou & Bilge Aykol & Jorma Larimo & Lida Kyrgidou & Paul Christodoulides, 2021. "Enhancing International Buyer-Seller Relationship Quality and Long-Term Orientation Using Emotional Intelligence: The Moderating Role of Foreign Culture," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 365-402, June.
    17. Tianchang Ni & Runping Zhu & Richard Krever, 2023. "Responses to News Overload in a Non-Partisan Environment: News Avoidance in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    18. Tomi Rajala, 2019. "Mind the Information Expectation Gap," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 104-125, March.
    19. Poushneh, Atieh, 2021. "How close do we feel to virtual product to make a purchase decision? Impact of perceived proximity to virtual product and temporal purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Ashill, Nicholas J. & Rod, Michel, 2011. "Burnout processes in non-clinical health service encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1116-1127, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4117-:d:1079089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.