IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4063-d1077987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marine Stewardship Council Certification in Finland and Russia: Global Standards and Local Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Tulaeva

    (Department of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, PL 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland)

  • Maria Tysiachniouk

    (Department of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, PL 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland)

  • Minna Pappila

    (Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Minni Tynkkynen

    (Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Kanslerinrinne 1, 33100 Tampere, Finland)

Abstract

The state of seafood resources around the world has been declining for the last 50 years. There are multiple global, regional, and national regulatory arrangements that make an effort to revert this situation. The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) is a voluntary global instrument, believed to foster sustainability in commercial fishing practices. This paper analyzes the institutionalization of MSC in Finland and Russia, and highlights how MSC as a global standard adapts to the different local contexts. It also shows which other global regulatory arrangements contribute to regulating fish production and what are the specifics of interaction between them. For the analysis of the MSC scheme, this paper uses the governance generating network (GGN) theory, which has been widely applied to the research on the FSC forest certification scheme and oil sector. The GGN lens helps to analyze the generative capacity of multiple global regulatory instruments including MSC in the Baltic Sea (Finland) and the Barents Sea (Russia). Qualitative methodology, such as semi-structured interviews with the same interview guide, document analysis, and participant observations were used in both Finland and Russia. We show that several GGNs are contributing to fishing regulations, e.g., the implementation of MSC in both countries is facilitated by multiple international organizations and conventions, which were signed prior to the creation of the MSC scheme. The limited added value of MSC certification is observed in both Finland and Russia: MSC ensures economic stability of certified companies and contributes to biodiversity conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Tulaeva & Maria Tysiachniouk & Minna Pappila & Minni Tynkkynen, 2023. "Marine Stewardship Council Certification in Finland and Russia: Global Standards and Local Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4063-:d:1077987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4063/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4063/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Pálsdóttir, Rakel Gyða & Folwarczny, Michal & Menon, R.G. Vishnu & Fagerstrøm, Asle, 2022. "Increasing the effectiveness of ecological food signaling: Comparing sustainability tags with eco-labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1099-1110.
    2. Paul Foley, 2013. "National Government Responses to Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Fisheries Certification: Insights from Atlantic Canada," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 284-307, April.
    3. Minako Iue & Mitsutaku Makino & Misuzu Asari, 2022. "Seafood Sustainability Supply Chain Trends and Challenges in Japan: Marine Stewardship Council Fisheries and Chain of Custody Certificates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. McDermott, Constance L. & Irland, Lloyd C. & Pacheco, Pablo, 2015. "Forest certification and legality initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon: Lessons for effective and equitable forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 134-142.
    5. Ponte, Stefano, 2008. "Greener than Thou: The Political Economy of Fish Ecolabeling and Its Local Manifestations in South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 159-175, January.
    6. Henry, Laura A. & Tysiachniouk, Maria, 2018. "The uneven response to global environmental governance: Russia's contentious politics of forest certification," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 97-105.
    7. Gulbrandsen, Lars H., 2009. "The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 654-660, July.
    8. Agni Kalfagianni & Philipp Pattberg, 2013. "Global fisheries governance beyond the State: unraveling the effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(2), pages 184-193, June.
    9. Tysiachniouk, Maria & McDermott, Constance L., 2016. "Certification with Russian characteristics: Implications for social and environmental equity," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 43-53.
    10. Frank Wijen & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2019. "Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02071504, HAL.
    11. Minna Pappila & Minni Tynkkynen, 2022. "The Role of MSC Marine Certification in Fisheries Governance in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Maria S. Tysiachniouk & Laura A. Henry & Svetlana A. Tulaeva & Leah S. Horowitz, 2020. "Who Benefits? How Interest-Convergence Shapes Benefit-Sharing and Indigenous Rights to Sustainable Livelihoods in Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Tysiachniouk, Maria S. & McDermott, Constance L. & Kulyasova, Antonina A. & Teitelbaum, Sara & Elbakidze, Marine, 2021. "The politics of scale in global governance: Do more stringent international forest certification standards protect local rights in Russia?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    14. Goyert, Wendy & Sagarin, Raphael & Annala, John, 2010. "The promise and pitfalls of Marine Stewardship Council certification: Maine lobster as a case study," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1103-1109, September.
    15. Karlsen, Kine Mari & Hermansen, Øystein & Dreyer, Bent M., 2012. "Eco-labeling of seafood: Does it affect the harvesting patterns of Norwegian fishermen?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1123-1130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank Wijen & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2019. "Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02071504, HAL.
    2. Ingrid van Putten & Catherine Longo & Ashleigh Arton & Matt Watson & Christopher M Anderson & Amber Himes-Cornell & Clara Obregón & Lucy Robinson & Tatiana van Steveninck, 2020. "Shifting focus: The impacts of sustainable seafood certification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Miret-Pastor, Lluís & Peiró-Signes, Ángel & Segarra-Oña, Maria-del-Val & Herrera-Racionero, Paloma, 2014. "Empirical analysis of sustainable fisheries and the relation to economic performance enhancement: The case of the Spanish fishing industry," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 105-110.
    4. Tolentino-Zondervan, Frazen & Berentsen, Paul & Bush, Simon & Idemne, Joseph & Babaran, Ricardo & Lansink, Alfons Oude, 2016. "Comparison of Private Incentive Mechanisms for Improving Sustainability of Filipino Tuna Fisheries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 264-279.
    5. Agni Kalfagianni & Philipp Pattberg, 2013. "Global fisheries governance beyond the State: unraveling the effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(2), pages 184-193, June.
    6. Minna Pappila & Minni Tynkkynen, 2022. "The Role of MSC Marine Certification in Fisheries Governance in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Schleifer, Philip & Fiorini, Matteo & Fransen, Luc, 2019. "Missing the Bigger Picture: A Population-level Analysis of Transnational Private Governance Organizations Active in the Global South," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Olson, Julia & Clay, Patricia M. & Pinto da Silva, Patricia, 2014. "Putting the seafood in sustainable food systems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 104-111.
    9. Carlson, Anna & Palmer, Charles, 2016. "A qualitative meta-synthesis of the benefits of eco-labeling in developing countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 129-145.
    10. Paul Foley & Karen Hébert, 2013. "Alternative Regimes of Transnational Environmental Certification: Governance, Marketization, and Place in Alaska's Salmon Fisheries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(11), pages 2734-2751, November.
    11. Stoll, Joshua S. & Johnson, Teresa R., 2015. "Under the banner of sustainability: The politics and prose of an emerging US federal seafood certification," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 415-422.
    12. Celina Schelle & Benno Pokorny, 2021. "How Inclusive Is Inclusive? A Critical Analysis of an Agribusiness Initiative in Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Simon R. Bush & Peter Oosterveer, 2015. "Vertically Differentiating Environmental Standards: The Case of the Marine Stewardship Council," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, February.
    14. A. Saidi & G. Sacchi & C. Cavallo & G. Cicia & R. Di Monaco & S. Puleo & T. Del Giudice, 2022. "Drivers of fish choice: an exploratory analysis in Mediterranean countries," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Folwarczny, Michał & Fagerstrøm, Asle & Menon, R.G. Vishnu & Sigurdardottir, Freyja Thoroddsen, 2023. "The importance of relative customer-based label equity when signaling sustainability and health with certifications and tags," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Kvalvik, Ingrid & Noestvold, Bjoerg H. & Young, James A., 2014. "National or supranational fisheries sustainability certification schemes? A critical analysis of Norwegian and Icelandic responses," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 137-142.
    17. Helen Packer & Wilf Swartz & Yoshitaka Ota & Megan Bailey, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices of the Largest Seafood Suppliers in the Wild Capture Fisheries Sector: From Vision to Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, April.
    18. Renckens, Stefan & Auld, Graeme, 2019. "Structure, path dependence, and adaptation: North-South imbalances in transnational private fisheries governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Deighan, L.K. & Jenkins, L.D., 2015. "Fishing for recognition: Understanding the use of NGO guidelines in fishery improvement projects," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 476-485.
    20. Bellchambers, Lynda M. & Phillips, Bruce F. & Pérez-Ramírez, Mónica & Lozano-Álvarez, Enrique & Ley-Cooper, Kim & Vega-Velazquez, Armando, 2014. "Addressing environmental considerations for Marine Stewardship Council certification: A case study using lobsters," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 249-260.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4063-:d:1077987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.