IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9025-d437400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Benefits? How Interest-Convergence Shapes Benefit-Sharing and Indigenous Rights to Sustainable Livelihoods in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Maria S. Tysiachniouk

    (Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
    The Centre for Independent Social Research, 190041 Saint Petersburg, Russia
    Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University, 6706KN Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Laura A. Henry

    (Department of Government and Legal Studies, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME 04011, USA)

  • Svetlana A. Tulaeva

    (North-West Institute of Management, Faculty of International Relations and Politics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 197101 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Leah S. Horowitz

    (Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
    School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

Abstract

The paper examines interactions of oil companies and reindeer herders in the tundra of the Russian Arctic. We focus on governance arrangements that have an impact on the sustainability of oil production and reindeer herding. We analyze a shift in benefit-sharing arrangements between oil companies and Indigenous Nenets reindeer herders in Nenets Autonomous Okrug (NAO), Russia, as an evolution of the herders’ rights, defined as the intertwined co-production of legal processes, ideologies, and power relations. Semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and document analysis demonstrate that in NAO, benefit-sharing shifted from paternalism (dependent on herders’ negotiation skills) to company-centered social responsibility (formalized compensation rules). This shift was enabled by the adoption of a formal methodology for calculating income lost due to extractive projects and facilitated by the regional government’s efforts to develop reindeer-herding. While laws per se did not change, herders’ ability to access compensation and markets increased. This paper shows that even when ideologies of indigeneity are not influential, the use of existing laws and convergence of the government’s and Indigenous groups’ economic interests may shift legal processes and power relations toward greater rights for Indigenous groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria S. Tysiachniouk & Laura A. Henry & Svetlana A. Tulaeva & Leah S. Horowitz, 2020. "Who Benefits? How Interest-Convergence Shapes Benefit-Sharing and Indigenous Rights to Sustainable Livelihoods in Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9025-:d:437400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9025/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9025/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leah S. Horowitz, 2016. "Rhizomic Resistance Meets Arborescent Assemblage: UNESCO World Heritage and the Disempowerment of Indigenous Activism in New Caledonia," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(1), pages 167-185, January.
    2. Maria S. Tysiachniouk, 2020. "Disentangling Benefit-Sharing Complexities of Oil Extraction on the North Slope of Alaska," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-31, July.
    3. Leah S Horowitz, 2013. "Toward Empathic Agonism: Conflicting Vulnerabilities in Urban Wetland Governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(10), pages 2344-2361, October.
    4. Laura A. Henry & Soili Nysten-Haarala & Svetlana Tulaeva & Maria Tysiachniouk, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Oil Industry in the Russian Arctic: Global Norms and Neo-Paternalism," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(8), pages 1340-1368, September.
    5. Elisa Morgera, 2015. "Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing at the Cross-Roads of the Human Right to Science and International Biodiversity Law," Laws, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Maria Tysiachniouk & Andrey N. Petrov & Vera Kuklina & Natalia Krasnoshtanova, 2018. "Between Soviet Legacy and Corporate Social Responsibility: Emerging Benefit Sharing Frameworks in the Irkutsk Oil Region, Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Svetlana Tulaeva & Maria Tysiachniouk & Minna Pappila & Minni Tynkkynen, 2023. "Marine Stewardship Council Certification in Finland and Russia: Global Standards and Local Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Holand, Øystein & Contiero, Barbara & Næss, Marius W. & Cozzi, Giulio, 2024. "“The Times They Are A-Changin' “ – research trends and perspectives of reindeer pastoralism – A review using text mining and topic modelling," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria S. Tysiachniouk, 2020. "Disentangling Benefit-Sharing Complexities of Oil Extraction on the North Slope of Alaska," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Svetlana Tulaeva & Soili Nysten-Haarala, 2019. "Resource Allocation in Oil-Dependent Communities: Oil Rent and Benefit Sharing Arrangements," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Maria Tysiachniouk & Andrey N. Petrov & Vera Kuklina & Natalia Krasnoshtanova, 2018. "Between Soviet Legacy and Corporate Social Responsibility: Emerging Benefit Sharing Frameworks in the Irkutsk Oil Region, Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Andrey N. Petrov & Maria S. Tysiachniouk, 2019. "Benefit Sharing in the Arctic: A Systematic View," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Svetlana A. Tulaeva & Maria S. Tysiachniouk & Laura A. Henry & Leah S. Horowitz, 2019. "Globalizing Extraction and Indigenous Rights in the Russian Arctic: The Enduring Role of the State in Natural Resource Governance," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Svetlana Tulaeva & Maria Tysiachniouk, 2017. "Benefit-Sharing Arrangements between Oil Companies and Indigenous People in Russian Northern Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Salisu Barau, Aliyu & Stringer, Lindsay C., 2015. "Access to and allocation of ecosystem services in Malaysia's Pulau Kukup Ramsar Site," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 167-173.
    8. Emma Wilson, 2019. "What is Benefit Sharing? Respecting Indigenous Rights and Addressing Inequities in Arctic Resource Projects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Burtseva Evdokia & Bysyina Anna, 2019. "Damage Compensation for Indigenous Peoples in the Conditions of Industrial Development of Territories on the Example of the Arctic Zone of the Sakha Republic," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, March.
    10. E. Shvarts & A. Pakhalov & A. Knizhnikov & L. Ametistova, 2018. "Environmental rating of oil and gas companies in Russia: How assessment affects environmental transparency and performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1023-1038, November.
    11. S. Bouard & C. Levacher & Y. Bencivengo & L. Decottigny & C. Demmer & P.Y. Le Meur & S. Blaise & J. Burton & F. Enjuanes & S. Grochain, 2018. "Programme "PME Minières en Nouvelle-Calédonie, Petites et moyennes entreprises minières en Nouvelle-Calédonie"," Working Papers hal-03379257, HAL.
    12. Tysiachniouk, Maria S. & McDermott, Constance L. & Kulyasova, Antonina A. & Teitelbaum, Sara & Elbakidze, Marine, 2021. "The politics of scale in global governance: Do more stringent international forest certification standards protect local rights in Russia?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Séverine Bouard & Claire Levacher & Yann Bencivengo & Louise Decottigny & Christine Demmer & Pierre-Yves Le Meur & Severine Blaise & John Burton & Franck Enjuanes & Sonia Grochain, 2018. "Petites et moyennes entreprises minières en Nouvelle-Calédonie. Rapport scientifique final," Working Papers ird-02157485, HAL.
    14. Paolo Esposito & Paolo Ricci & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Leading for social change: Waste management in the place of social (ir)responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 667-674, March.
    15. Alina Benyaminova & Martin Mathews & Paul Langley & Alison Rieple, 2019. "The impact of changes in stakeholder salience on corporate social responsibility activities in Russian energy firms: A contribution to the divergence/convergence debate," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1222-1234, November.
    16. Sergey I. Nosov & Boris E. Bondarev & Andrey A. Gladkov & Violetta Gassiy, 2019. "Land Resources Evaluation for Damage Compensation to Indigenous Peoples in the Arctic (Case-Study of Anabar Region in Yakutia)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, August.
    17. Natalia Krasnoshtanova, 2023. "Sustainability of Local Communities in a New Oil and Gas Region: The Case of Eastern Siberia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Vera Kuklina & Andrey N Petrov & Natalia Krasnoshtanova & Viktor Bogdanov, 2020. "Mobilizing Benefit-Sharing Through Transportation Infrastructure: Informal Roads, Extractive Industries and Benefit-Sharing in the Irkutsk Oil and Gas Region, Russia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Schoderer, Mirja & Ott, Marlen, 2022. "Contested water- and miningscapes – Explaining the high intensity of water and mining conflicts in a meta-study," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Mohammad Sohail Yunis & Dima Jamali & Hina Hashim, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility of Foreign Multinationals in a Developing Country Context: Insights from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9025-:d:437400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.