IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2470-d1051430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Philosophical Research on Enterprise Innovation Ecology Based on a Human–Computer Interaction Mental Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Dong

    (School of Humanities, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Enterprise innovation ecology plays a vital role in the operation and development of enterprises. It can enable enterprises to have benign and sustainable progress space in action. At the same time, it can also make the innovation ability of enterprises grow unprecedentedly, which is a crucial factor related to the survival and lifeline of enterprises. However, enterprise managers are often too immersed in concept innovation and structural optimization in the actual innovation and ecological construction of enterprises. Still, they do not pay attention to the problems in actual construction. This would cause the actual operation of the system to be restricted by key influencing factors such as environmental protection policies, making it difficult to achieve effective progress. In this regard, the purpose of this paper is to analyze and discuss the enterprise innovation ecological philosophy based on the human–computer interaction mental model. Therefore, this paper comprehensively considers four key factors that affect the construction of enterprise innovation ecology, namely, the promotion of enterprise technology, the competitiveness of enterprise market, the innovation characteristics of enterprises, and the environmental constraints of innovation ecology, and improves and perfects the innovation ecosystem from these factors. Finally, an efficient ecological model of enterprise innovation was designed, and the scientific construction was carried out through the human–computer interaction mental model combining human–computer interaction technology and cognitive psychology. At the same time, the model is applied to the actual enterprise operation, and the naive Bayesian algorithm is adopted to optimize the relevant performance of the algorithm model. The experimental results showed that the highest sample accuracy of the algorithm reaches 92.9%, which greatly improved the operation efficiency of enterprise innovation ecological construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Dong, 2023. "Philosophical Research on Enterprise Innovation Ecology Based on a Human–Computer Interaction Mental Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2470-:d:1051430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghazinoory, Sepehr & Nasri, Shohreh & Afshari-Mofrad, Masoud & Taghizadeh Moghadam, Negin, 2023. "National Innovation Biome (NIB): A novel conceptualization for innovation development at the national level," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Małgorzata Łęgowik-Małolepsza & Jaroslav Kollmann & Jaroslav Kollmann & Daniel Chamrada & Daniel Chamrada, 2024. "Eco-marketing and the competitive strategy of enterprises – review of the research results of energy companies," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 11(4), pages 135-153, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Fang Dong & Jiyao Yin & Jirubin Xiang & Zhangyu Chang & Tiantian Gu & Feihu Han, 2023. "EWM-FCE-ODM-Based Evaluation of Smart Community Construction: From the Perspective of Residents’ Sense of Gain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Rubio, Francisco & Llopis-Albert, Carlos & Besa, Antonio José, 2023. "Optimal allocation of energy sources in hydrogen production for sustainable deployment of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Zeng, Shouzhen & Hu, Yingjie & Llopis-Albert, Carlos, 2023. "Stakeholder-inclusive multi-criteria development of smart cities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Kumar, Ajay & Aránega, Alba Yela & Biswas, Baidyanath, 2023. "Development of an integrative model for electronic vendor relationship management for improving technological innovation, social change and sustainability performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    6. Barros, Victor & Verga Matos, Pedro & Miranda Sarmento, Joaquim & Rino Vieira, Pedro, 2023. "High-tech firms: Dividend policy in a context of sustainability and technological change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Costa Climent, Juan & Ulrich Berenguer, Klaus Jurgen, 2023. "Born to be sustainable: How to combine strategic disruption, open innovation, and process digitization to create a sustainable business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Xie, Xuemei & Liu, Xiaojie & Blanco, Cristina, 2023. "Evaluating and forecasting the niche fitness of regional innovation ecosystems: A comparative evaluation of different optimized grey models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Kędra, Arleta & Maleszyk, Piotr & Visvizi, Anna, 2023. "Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Sun, Helin & Cappa, Francesco & Zhu, Jia & Peruffo, Enzo, 2023. "The effect of CEO social capital, CEO duality and state-ownership on corporate innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Schiavone, Francesco & Mancini, Daniela & Leone, Daniele & Lavorato, Domenica, 2021. "Digital business models and ridesharing for value co-creation in healthcare: A multi-stakeholder ecosystem analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    12. Tiantian Gu & Yongchao Wang & Li Wang & Enyang Hao & Chenyang Wang & Muhan Xie, 2024. "Quantifying Residents’ Perceptions of Smart Community Construction through a Hybrid EWM-PROMETHEE II Method: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Diego Corrales-Garay & Eva-María Mora-Valentín & Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, 2020. "Entrepreneurship Through Open Data: An Opportunity for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Sanjay Chaudhary & Puneet Kaur & Hind Alofaysan & Jantje Halberstadt & Amandeep Dhir, 2023. "Connecting the dots? Entrepreneurial ecosystems and sustainable entrepreneurship as pathways to sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5935-5951, December.
    15. Seunghwan Myeong & Syed Asad Abbas Bokhari, 2023. "Building Participative E-Governance in Smart Cities: Moderating Role of Institutional and Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Elisabeth S. C. Berger & Christine Blanka, 2024. "Comprehensive and multifaceted perspectives on sustainability, urban studies, and entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 471-501, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2470-:d:1051430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.