IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2297-d1047662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Low-Cost Gamified Urban Planning Methodology Enhanced with Co-Creation and Participatory Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Kavouras

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Emmanuel Sardis

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Eftychios Protopapadakis

    (Department of Applied Informatics, School of Information Sciences, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ioannis Rallis

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Anastasios Doulamis

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nikolaos Doulamis

    (School of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Targeted nature-based small-scale interventions is an approach commonly adopted by urban developers. The public acceptance of their implementation could be improved by participation, emphasizing residents or shopkeepers located close to the areas of interest. In this work, we propose a methodology that combines 3D technology, based on open data sources, user-generated content, 3D software and game engines for both minimizing the time and cost of the whole planning process and enhancing citizen participation. The proposed schemes are demonstrated in Piraeus (Greece) and Gladsaxe (Denmark). The core findings can be summarized as follows: (a) the time and cost are minimized by using online databases, (b) the gamification of the planning process enhances the decision making process and (c) the interactivity provided by the game engine inspired the participation of non-experts in the planning process (co-creation and co-evaluation), which decentralizes and democratizes the final planning solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Kavouras & Emmanuel Sardis & Eftychios Protopapadakis & Ioannis Rallis & Anastasios Doulamis & Nikolaos Doulamis, 2023. "A Low-Cost Gamified Urban Planning Methodology Enhanced with Co-Creation and Participatory Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2297-:d:1047662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giorgio Caprari & Giordana Castelli & Marco Montuori & Marialucia Camardelli & Roberto Malvezzi, 2022. "Digital Twin for Urban Planning in the Green Deal Era: A State of the Art and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Ehab Shahat & Chang T. Hyun & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Mario Wolf & Heinrich Söbke & Florian Wehking, 2020. "Mixed Reality Media-Enabled Public Participation in Urban Planning," Progress in IS, in: Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck & Philipp A. Rauschnabel (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 125-138, Springer.
    4. Cristina Ampatzidou & Katharina Gugerell & Teodora Constantinescu & Oswald Devisch & Martina Jauschneg & Martin Berger, 2018. "All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 34-46.
    5. Fabian Dembski & Uwe Wössner & Mike Letzgus & Michael Ruddat & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cecilia Avila-Garzon & Jorge Bacca-Acosta, 2024. "Thirty Years of Research and Methodologies in Value Co-Creation and Co-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Xinyuan Lu & Fangfang Ren & Xuelin Wang & Hua Meng, 2024. "How Gamified Interactions Drive Users’ Green Value Co-Creation Behaviors: An Empirical Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haraguchi, Masahiko & Funahashi, Tomomi & Biljecki, Filip, 2024. "Assessing governance implications of city digital twin technology: A maturity model approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Casey R. Corrado & Suzanne M. DeLong & Emily G. Holt & Edward Y. Hua & Andreas Tolk, 2022. "Combining Green Metrics and Digital Twins for Sustainability Planning and Governance of Smart Buildings and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Giorgio Caprari & Giordana Castelli & Marco Montuori & Marialucia Camardelli & Roberto Malvezzi, 2022. "Digital Twin for Urban Planning in the Green Deal Era: A State of the Art and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Batel Yossef Ravid & Meirav Aharon-Gutman, 2023. "The Social Digital Twin:The Social Turn in the Field of Smart CitiesÂ," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1455-1470, July.
    5. Micael Sousa, 2024. "Moving Pieces and Allocating Budget Together: A Framework for Using Analog Serious Games in Sustainable Collaborative Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Matthew Callcut & Jean-Paul Cerceau Agliozzo & Liz Varga & Lauren McMillan, 2021. "Digital Twins in Civil Infrastructure Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-32, October.
    7. Ekaterina V. Orlova, 2022. "Design Technology and AI-Based Decision Making Model for Digital Twin Engineering," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Claire Daniel & Christopher Pettit, 2022. "Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems: Results of a citation network analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(7), pages 1875-1892, September.
    9. Andreea Orîndaru & Mihaela Constantinescu & Claudia-Elena Țuclea & Ștefan-Claudiu Căescu & Margareta Stela Florescu & Ionel Dumitru, 2020. "Rurbanization—Making the City Greener: Young Citizen Implication and Future Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Ahmed Ehab & Tim Heath, 2023. "Exploring Immersive Co-Design: Comparing Human Interaction in Real and Virtual Elevated Urban Spaces in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Agnieszka Szczepańska & Rafał Kaźmierczak & Monika Myszkowska, 2021. "Virtual Reality as a Tool for Public Consultations in Spatial Planning and Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    13. Yadi Zhao & Lei Yan & Jian Wu & Ximing Song, 2023. "Design and Implementation of a Digital Twin System for Log Rotary Cutting Optimization," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Mona Jabbari & Zahra Ahmadi & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Defining a Digital System for the Pedestrian Network as a Conceptual Implementation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, February.
    15. Hossein Omrany & Karam M. Al-Obaidi & Amreen Husain & Amirhosein Ghaffarianhoseini, 2023. "Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Current Implementations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Paz Fernández & Matías Ceacero-Moreno, 2021. "Urban Sustainability and Natural Hazards Management; Designs Using Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    17. Vittorio Astarita & Giuseppe Guido & Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas & Sami Shaffiee Haghshenas, 2024. "Risk Reduction in Transportation Systems: The Role of Digital Twins According to a Bibliometric-Based Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    18. Inés Aquilué & Angélica Caicedo & Joan Moreno & Miquel Estrada & Laia Pagès, 2021. "A Methodology for Assessing the Impact of Living Labs on Urban Design: The Case of the Furnish Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.
    19. Rebekka Volk & Mihir Rambhia & Elias Naber & Frank Schultmann, 2022. "Urban Resource Assessment, Management, and Planning Tools for Land, Ecosystems, Urban Climate, Water, and Materials—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    20. Robert-Jan Den Haan & Mascha C. Van der Voort, 2018. "On Evaluating Social Learning Outcomes of Serious Games to Collaboratively Address Sustainability Problems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2297-:d:1047662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.