IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10411-d1531407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Video Games in Civic Engagement in Urban Planning, a Methodology for Effective and Informed Selection of Games for Specific Needs

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Szot

    (Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, 61-131 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

Video games are recognized as significant tools and mediums to be used in civic participation in spatial planning and fostering local communities. As the phenomenon is widely recognized in papers presenting singular case studies and broader analyses in the field, selecting such serious games with certain characteristics remains unclear. The informed process of choosing games with particular properties regarding genesis, graphic style, genre, and complexity as the response for specified needs and process assumptions appears to be supportive in preventing unnecessary costs and data overproduction. Such avoidance is an important part of sustainable digital transformation. Therefore, there is a need for a more conscious process of selecting video games to be used in a participatory process. The following paper aims to propose a numerical base for a decisional instrument that could be useful for specifying the characteristics of games to be utilized in participation. They performed a multicriteria analysis of documented cases of implementing video games in civic engagement, allowing the creation of a set of numeric indicators that help determine the properties of games that will be most appropriate for given process assumptions. Such a tool can prevent overproducing data on the one hand and may cause dissemination of the presented way of handling the participation process on the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Szot, 2024. "Video Games in Civic Engagement in Urban Planning, a Methodology for Effective and Informed Selection of Games for Specific Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-36, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10411-:d:1531407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Delaney, 2022. "Minecraft and Playful Public Participation in Urban Design," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 330-342.
    2. Ioannis Kavouras & Emmanuel Sardis & Eftychios Protopapadakis & Ioannis Rallis & Anastasios Doulamis & Nikolaos Doulamis, 2023. "A Low-Cost Gamified Urban Planning Methodology Enhanced with Co-Creation and Participatory Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Cristina Ampatzidou & Katharina Gugerell & Teodora Constantinescu & Oswald Devisch & Martina Jauschneg & Martin Berger, 2018. "All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 34-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Micael Sousa, 2024. "Moving Pieces and Allocating Budget Together: A Framework for Using Analog Serious Games in Sustainable Collaborative Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Agnieszka Szczepańska & Rafał Kaźmierczak & Monika Myszkowska, 2021. "Virtual Reality as a Tool for Public Consultations in Spatial Planning and Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Inés Aquilué & Angélica Caicedo & Joan Moreno & Miquel Estrada & Laia Pagès, 2021. "A Methodology for Assessing the Impact of Living Labs on Urban Design: The Case of the Furnish Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Robert-Jan Den Haan & Mascha C. Van der Voort, 2018. "On Evaluating Social Learning Outcomes of Serious Games to Collaboratively Address Sustainability Problems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Mathias Lanezki & Catharina Siemer & Steffen Wehkamp, 2020. "“Changing the Game—Neighbourhood”: An Energy Transition Board Game, Developed in a Co-Design Process: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Cecilia Avila-Garzon & Jorge Bacca-Acosta, 2024. "Thirty Years of Research and Methodologies in Value Co-Creation and Co-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Ali Termos & Neil Yorke-Smith, 2022. "Urbanism and Geographic Crises: A Micro-Simulation Lens on Beirut," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 87-100.
    8. Kenny, Daniel C. & Bakhanova, Elena & Hämäläinen, Raimo P. & Voinov, Alexey, 2022. "Participatory modelling and systems intelligence: A systems-based and transdisciplinary partnership," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Jooseok Oh & Minho Seo, 2022. "Evaluation of Citizen–Student Cooperative Urban Planning and Design Experience in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Carissa J Champlin & Johannes Flacke & Geert PMR Dewulf, 2022. "A game co-design method to elicit knowledge for the contextualization of spatial models," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 1074-1090, March.
    11. Xinyuan Lu & Fangfang Ren & Xuelin Wang & Hua Meng, 2024. "How Gamified Interactions Drive Users’ Green Value Co-Creation Behaviors: An Empirical Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Micael Sousa & António Pais Antunes & Nuno Pinto & Nelson Zagalo, 2022. "Fast Serious Analogue Games in Planning: The Role of Non-Player Participants," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(2), pages 175-193, April.
    13. Ioannis Kavouras & Emmanuel Sardis & Eftychios Protopapadakis & Ioannis Rallis & Anastasios Doulamis & Nikolaos Doulamis, 2023. "A Low-Cost Gamified Urban Planning Methodology Enhanced with Co-Creation and Participatory Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Wijitbusaba Marome & Boonanan Natakun & Diane Archer, 2021. "Examining the Use of Serious Games for Enhancing Community Resilience to Climate Risks in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10411-:d:1531407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.