IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16484-d1292612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Analysis of the WoEm-M Scale to Evaluate Women Empowerment in the Ecuadorian University Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Jhesenia Sacoto-Loor

    (Carrera Educación Básica, Facultad Educación, Turismo, Artes y Humanidades, Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí, Manta 130203, Ecuador)

  • María Isabel Amor

    (Department of Education, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain)

  • Mercedes Osuna

    (Department of Education, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain
    Department of English and German Philology, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain)

Abstract

Women’s empowerment embodies being acknowledged as rights-bearing individuals. Despite progress in women’s rights, disparities persist across various domains. This study seeks to validate a psychometric scale of 31 items across seven factors: participatory empowerment, temerity, external influences, independence, social satisfaction, confidence, and equality. The aim is to assess women’s empowerment within the university setting. The research was conducted in a cross-sectional, non-experimental manner, with the voluntary participation of 1478 university students from four higher education institutions in Zone 4 of Ecuador. Data was analyzed using inferential statistics, encompassing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The results indicated that the empowerment measurement tool could consist of 24 items grouped into six factors, and this model exhibited a good fit. The validation process enabled us to pinpoint the principal factor explaining women’s empowerment in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhesenia Sacoto-Loor & María Isabel Amor & Mercedes Osuna, 2023. "Psychometric Analysis of the WoEm-M Scale to Evaluate Women Empowerment in the Ecuadorian University Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16484-:d:1292612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allan P. O. Williams & Sally Woodward, 1994. "Learning Theories and the Development of Expertise," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Competitive Consultant, chapter 7, pages 83-98, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Shireen J. Jejeebhoy & Zeba A. Sathar, 2001. "Women's Autonomy in India and Pakistan: The Influence of Religion and Region," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 27(4), pages 687-712, December.
    3. Lu Gram & Joanna Morrison & Neha Sharma & Bhim Shrestha & Dharma Manandhar & Anthony Costello & Naomi Saville & Jolene Skordis-Worrall, 2017. "Validating an Agency-based Tool for Measuring Women’s Empowerment in a Complex Public Health Trial in Rural Nepal," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 107-135, January.
    4. Robinson, Amanda Lea & Gottlieb, Jessica, 2021. "How to Close the Gender Gap in Political Participation: Lessons from Matrilineal Societies in Africa," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 68-92, January.
    5. Allan P. O. Williams & Sally Woodward, 1994. "Consultancy: A Developing Profession," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Competitive Consultant, chapter 2, pages 13-27, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Naila Kabeer, 1999. "Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 30(3), pages 435-464, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sojin Yu & Feinian Chen & Sonalde Desai, 2023. "Aligning household decision-making with work and education: A comparative analysis of women’s empowerment," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(19), pages 513-548.
    2. Jihye Kim & Wendy Olsen & Arkadiusz Wiśniowski, 2023. "Predicting Child-Labour Risks by Norms in India," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(6), pages 1605-1626, December.
    3. Sonalde Desai & Lijuan Wu, 2010. "Structured Inequalities—Factors Associated with Spatial Disparities in Maternity Care in India," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 4(3), pages 293-319, August.
    4. Mishra, Khushbu & Sam, Abdoul G., 2016. "Does Women’s Land Ownership Promote Their Empowerment? Empirical Evidence from Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 360-371.
    5. Choudhuri, Pallavi & Desai, Sonalde, 2020. "Gender inequalities and household fuel choice in India," MPRA Paper 110340, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Sajid Hussain & Shafiq Jullandhry & Taimoor ul Hassan, 2022. "Is there any relationship between TV morning shows and urban women’s empowerment in Pakistan? A case study from Lahore," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 557-587, April.
    7. Rajkhowa, Pallavi & Qaim, Matin, 2022. "Mobile phones, women's physical mobility, and contraceptive use in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    8. Armaan A Rowther & Asiya K Kazi & Huma Nazir & Maria Atiq & Najia Atif & Nida Rauf & Abid Malik & Pamela J Surkan, 2020. "“A Woman Is a Puppet.” Women’s Disempowerment and Prenatal Anxiety in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study of Sources, Mitigators, and Coping Strategies for Anxiety in Pregnancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Filza Waseem & Tahira Jibeen & Waseem Zafar Iqbal, 2020. "Determinants of Life Satisfaction: Role of Living Arrangements, Social Status, and Perceived Satisfaction in Women," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 335-349, June.
    10. Yasmin, Nazia & Grundmann, Philipp, 2020. "Home-cooked energy transitions: Women empowerment and biogas-based cooking technology in Pakistan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Lu Gram & Joanna Morrison & Jolene Skordis-Worrall, 2019. "Organising Concepts of ‘Women’s Empowerment’ for Measurement: A Typology," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 1349-1376, June.
    12. Robin A. Richardson, 2018. "Measuring Women’s Empowerment: A Critical Review of Current Practices and Recommendations for Researchers," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 539-557, June.
    13. Trommlerová, Sofia Karina & Klasen, Stephan & Leßmann, Ortrud, 2015. "Determinants of Empowerment in a Capability-Based Poverty Approach: Evidence from The Gambia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-15.
    14. Biswamitra Sahu & Patricia Jeffery & Nakkeeran N, 2016. "Contextualizing Women’s Agency in Marital Negotiations," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, September.
    15. Sofia Riaz & Zahid Pervaiz, 2018. "The impact of women’s education and employment on their empowerment: an empirical evidence from household level survey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2855-2870, November.
    16. Seymour, Greg & Peterman, Amber, 2018. "Context and measurement: An analysis of the relationship between intrahousehold decision making and autonomy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 97-112.
    17. Mara José Montenegro Guerra & Sandeep Mohapatra & Brent Swallow, 2019. "What influence do empowered women have? Land and the reality of women’s relative power in Peru," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1225-1255, December.
    18. Naeem Akram, 2018. "Women’s Empowerment in Pakistan: Its Dimensions and Determinants," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 755-775, November.
    19. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    20. S Anukriti & Catalina Herrera‐Almanza & Praveen K. Pathak & Mahesh Karra, 2020. "Curse of the Mummy‐ji: The Influence of Mothers‐in‐Law on Women in India†," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1328-1351, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16484-:d:1292612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.