IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14384-d1251142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Balanced Scorecard Proposal for Gender Equality and Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Isabela Blasi Valduga

    (Centre for Sustainable Development (GREENS), University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Florianópolis 88015-110, Brazil)

  • Mauricio Andrade De Lima

    (Programa de Pós Graduação em Desenvolvimento e Sociedade (PPGDS), Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe (UNIARP), Caçador 89500-199, Brazil)

  • Brenda Caroline Geraldo Castro

    (Centre for Sustainable Development (GREENS), University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Florianópolis 88015-110, Brazil)

  • Paulo Guilherme Fuchs

    (Centre for Sustainable Development (GREENS), University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Florianópolis 88015-110, Brazil
    Federal Institute of Santa Catarina (IFSC), Florianópolis 88075-010, Brazil)

  • Wellyngton Silva de Amorim

    (Centre for Sustainable Development (GREENS), University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Florianópolis 88015-110, Brazil)

  • José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra

    (Centre for Sustainable Development (GREENS), University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Florianópolis 88015-110, Brazil
    Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance (CEENRG), University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK)

Abstract

Gender equality and women’s empowerment are essential for sustainable development, yet several constraints make achieving them difficult. A strategic management tool is required to address these challenges and manage objectives and goals effectively. This study aims to redesign Balanced Scorecard (BSC), a strategic management tool for gender equality, to enable the strategic management of goals and indicators related to the fifth sustainable goal (SDG 5) proposed by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The BSC for gender equality was developed through a comprehensive literature review on gender-specific targets and indicators and the restructuring of the traditional architecture of the BSC to include new dimensions, guiding questions, and objectives to achieve this study’s goals. Moreover, a strategy map was constructed to illustrate the strategy and cause-and-effect relationships across the BSC dimensions. This research provides concrete gender strategies that help organizations implement a management tool to measure and manage their performance related to gender equality and sustainable development. The findings suggest that the BSC for gender equality can contribute significantly to a clearer understanding of how organizations can measure and promote gender equality. The implications of this study are significant for promoting and advancing gender equality, helping organizations, researchers, and civil society translate this goal into practical terms, and applying the concepts discussed for sustainable development and women’s empowerment in practical circumstances. Ultimately, using the BSC for gender equality is expected to result in social and economic benefits for current and future generations, making it a valuable tool for organizations and policy makers to promote sustainable development and gender equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabela Blasi Valduga & Mauricio Andrade De Lima & Brenda Caroline Geraldo Castro & Paulo Guilherme Fuchs & Wellyngton Silva de Amorim & José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra, 2023. "A Balanced Scorecard Proposal for Gender Equality and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14384-:d:1251142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim Toffoletti & Karen Starr, 2016. "Women Academics and Work–Life Balance: Gendered Discourses of Work and Care," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 489-504, September.
    2. Robert S. Kaplan, 2010. "Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard," Harvard Business School Working Papers 10-074, Harvard Business School.
    3. Jonathan Woetzel, 2015. "The Power of Parity: How Advancing Women's Equality can Add $12 trillion to Global Growth," Working Papers id:7570, eSocialSciences.
    4. Demirguc-Kunt, Asli & Klapper, Leora & Singer, Dorothe, 2013. "Financial inclusion and legal discrimination against women : evidence from developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6416, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro M. Martín-Gómez & María Pineda-Ganfornina & María Jesús Ávila-Gutiérrez & Alejandro Agote-Garrido & Juan Ramón Lama-Ruiz, 2024. "Balanced Scorecard for Circular Economy: A Methodology for Sustainable Organizational Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyriaki Papadopoulou, 2020. "Comparative Review Of Performance Measurement Methods Effectiveness," Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 17(1), pages 127-139.
    2. Natalia Semenova, 2021. "Management control systems in response to social and environmental risk in large Nordic companies," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Caroline PERRIN & Laurent WEILL, 2021. "No Men, No Cry? How Gender Equality in Access to Credit Enhances Financial Stability," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2021-02, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    4. Maria Bastida & Luisa Helena Pinto & Ana Olveira Blanco & Maite Cancelo, 2020. "Female Entrepreneurship: Can Cooperatives Contribute to Overcoming the Gender Gap? A Spanish First Step to Equality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. David Carassus & Damien Gardey & Christophe Maurel, 2011. "Les démarches locales de performance publique face à la LOLF : mimétisme ou innovation ?," Post-Print hal-02431106, HAL.
    6. Chandralekha Ghosh & Rimita Hom Chaudhury, 2019. "Gender Gap in case of Financial Inclusion: An Empirical Analysis in Indian Context," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(4), pages 2615-2630.
    7. Ozili, Peterson K, 2020. "Financial inclusion: a strong critique," MPRA Paper 101813, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Shahid Manzoor Shah & Amjad Ali, 2023. "Macro Dimensions of Financial Inclusion Index and its Status in Developing Countries," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Ekin Ayşe Özşuca, 2019. "Gender gap in financial inclusion: Evidence from MENA," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 8(4), pages 199-208.
    10. Thi Thu Tra Pham & Thai Vu Hong Nguyen & Son Kien Nguyen & Hieu Thi Hoang Nguyen, 2023. "Does planned innovation promote financial access? Evidence from Vietnamese SMEs," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 281-307, June.
    11. António Afonso & M. Carmen Blanco-Arana, 2024. "The persistence of gender pay and employment gaps in European countries," Working Papers REM 2024/0338, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    12. Zelu, Barbara Ama & Iranzo, Susana & Perez-Laborda, Alejandro, 2024. "Financial inclusion and women economic empowerment in Ghana," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Leora Klapper & Sandeep Singh, 2015. "The Gender Gap in the Use of Financial Services in Turkey," World Bank Publications - Reports 25412, The World Bank Group.
    14. Zelda Marquardt & Yuichi Ikeda, 2022. "Network Analysis of the Gender Gap in International Remittances by Migrants," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 337-376, October.
    15. Ozili, Peterson Kitakogelu, 2021. "Financial inclusion and legal system quality: are they correlated?," MPRA Paper 110518, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Kara, Alper & Zhou, Haoyong & Zhou, Yifan, 2021. "Achieving the United Nations' sustainable development goals through financial inclusion: A systematic literature review of access to finance across the globe," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Valerija Botric & Tanja Broz, 2017. "Gender Differences in Financial Inclusion: Central and South Eastern Europe," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 15(2), pages 209-227.
    18. Hui Shan Loh & Vinh V. Thai, 2016. "Managing port-related supply chain disruptions (PSCDs): a management model and empirical evidence," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 436-455, May.
    19. Leanne Roncolato & Nicholas Reksten & Caren Grown, 2017. "Engendering Growth Diagnostics: Examining Constraints to Private Investment and Entrepreneurship," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(2), pages 263-287, January.
    20. Sholevar, Maryam & Harris, Laurence, 2019. "Mind the gap: A discussion paper on Financial Literacy, Financial behaviour and Financial Education : Is there any Gender Gap?," OSF Preprints b7zd6, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14384-:d:1251142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.