IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13690-d1239261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synthetic Data as a Proxy for Real-World Electronic Health Records in the Patient Length of Stay Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Dominik Bietsch

    (Institute of Information Systems, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Robert Stahlbock

    (Institute of Information Systems, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
    FOM University of Applied Sciences, Leimkugelstr. 6, 45141 Essen, Germany)

  • Stefan Voß

    (Institute of Information Systems, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

While generative artificial intelligence has gained popularity, e.g., for the creation of images, it can also be used for the creation of synthetic tabular data. This bears great potential, especially for the healthcare industry, where data are often scarce and underlie privacy restrictions. For instance, the creation of synthetic electronic health records (EHR) promises to improve the usage of machine learning algorithms, which usually work with large amounts of data. This also applies for the prediction of the patient length of stay (LOS), a key measure for hospitals. Thereby, the LOS represents one of the core tools for decision makers to plan the allocation of resources. Thus, this paper aims to add to the still-young research concerning the application of generative adversarial nets (GAN) on tabular EHR. It does that with the intention to leverage the advantages of synthetic data for the prediction of the LOS in order to contribute to the efficiency-enhancing and cost-saving aspirations of hospitals and insurance companies. Therefore, the applicability of synthetic data that is generated using GANs as a proxy for scarce real-world EHR for the patient LOS multi-class classification task is examined. In this context, the Conditional Tabular GAN (CTGAN) and the Copula GAN are selected as the underlying models as they are state-of-the-art GAN architectures designed for generating synthetic tabular data. The CTGAN is found to be the superior model for the underlying use case. Nevertheless, the paper shows that there is still room for improvement when applying state-of-the-art GAN architectures to clinical healthcare data.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominik Bietsch & Robert Stahlbock & Stefan Voß, 2023. "Synthetic Data as a Proxy for Real-World Electronic Health Records in the Patient Length of Stay Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13690-:d:1239261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13690/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13690/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nowok, Beata & Raab, Gillian M. & Dibben, Chris, 2016. "synthpop: Bespoke Creation of Synthetic Data in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 74(i11).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gunjan Chandra & Pekka Siirtola & Satu Tamminen & Mikael J. Knip & Riitta Veijola & Juha Röning, 2022. "Impacts of Data Synthesis: A Metric for Quantifiable Data Standards and Performances," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-26, December.
    2. James Jackson & Robin Mitra & Brian Francis & Iain Dove, 2022. "Using saturated count models for user‐friendly synthesis of large confidential administrative databases," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1613-1643, October.
    3. Daiho Uhm & Sunghae Jun, 2022. "Zero-Inflated Patent Data Analysis Using Generating Synthetic Samples," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, July.
    4. Felix Ritchie & Jim Smith, 2019. "Confidentiality and linked data," Papers 1907.06465, arXiv.org.
    5. Joshua Snoke & Gillian M. Raab & Beata Nowok & Chris Dibben & Aleksandra Slavkovic, 2018. "General and specific utility measures for synthetic data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(3), pages 663-688, June.
    6. Wesley J. Marrero & Mariel S. Lavieri & Jeremy B. Sussman, 2021. "Optimal cholesterol treatment plans and genetic testing strategies for cardiovascular diseases," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Jahangir Alam M. & Dostie Benoit & Drechsler Jörg & Vilhuber Lars, 2020. "Applying data synthesis for longitudinal business data across three countries," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 212-236, August.
    8. Erik D. Mueller & J. S. Onésimo Sandoval & Srikanth P. Mudigonda & Michael Elliott, 2019. "Extending cluster-based ensemble learning through synthetic population generation for modeling disparities in health insurance coverage across Missouri," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 271-291, July.
    9. Asunur Cezar & Srinivasan Raghunathan & Sumit Sarkar, 2020. "Adversarial Classification: Impact of Agents’ Faking Cost on Firms and Agents," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2789-2807, December.
    10. Speidel, Matthias & Drechsler, Jörg & Jolani, Shahab, 2018. "R package hmi: a convenient tool for hierarchical multiple imputation and beyond," IAB-Discussion Paper 201816, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    11. Lau Lilleholt & Ingo Zettler & Cornelia Betsch & Robert Böhm, 2023. "Development and validation of the pandemic fatigue scale," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Stefan Wimmer & Robert Finger, 2023. "A note on synthetic data for replication purposes in agricultural economics," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 316-323, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13690-:d:1239261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.