IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13281-d1232939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Patterns in the Concept of Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Processes in the Field of Knowledge Management in Companies Operating in the Metal Industry in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Rafał Prusak

    (Department of Production Management, Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland)

  • Monika Górska

    (Department of Production Management, Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland)

  • Paulina Skalik-Lubieniecka

    (Department of Production Management, Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland)

Abstract

Sustainable development is an opportunity for modern enterprises to build unique market advantages, but it is always a kind of compromise between financial benefits and activities focused on environmental protection. It also requires companies to be able to acquire and process information, the sources of which are both internal and external, and to process it into effective knowledge. Quality management processes are an important element supporting knowledge management as a consequence of similar priorities. There are direct and indirect relationships between quality management, knowledge management and sustainable development. Related issues are an important element of modern research, but there are still some knowledge gaps that need to be filled. The authors, based on the literature analysis, concluded that there are no studies defining the relationship between quality management and knowledge management in the context of sustainable development relating to the Polish metal industry. Therefore, the objective of this study is to identify patterns of company activities in the area of knowledge management relating to the improvement of manufacturing processes in companies operating in the metal industry in Poland. At the same time, it was indicated which aspects of knowledge management are at the centre of management’s concerns. The study was carried out using a survey questionnaire, with 1930 questionnaires collected from employees in 50 companies selected for the study. The study carried out discovered that in the various areas of the Japanese knowledge management model, companies distribute the emphasis differently, which manifests itself in the procedures and ways of operating. At the same time, there are significant differences between large and medium-sized enterprises, indicating that the scale of operation influences the perception of the importance of individual elements of the knowledge management system in the context of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafał Prusak & Monika Górska & Paulina Skalik-Lubieniecka, 2023. "Strategic Patterns in the Concept of Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Processes in the Field of Knowledge Management in Companies Operating in the Metal Industry in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13281-:d:1232939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13281/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13281/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tari, Juan Jose & Molina, Jose Francisco & Castejon, Juan Luis, 2007. "The relationship between quality management practices and their effects on quality outcomes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 483-501, December.
    2. Wen, Xuanhao & Cao, Huajun & Li, Hongcheng & Zheng, Jie & Ge, Weiwei & Chen, Erheng & Gao, Xi & Hon, Bernard, 2022. "A dual energy benchmarking methodology for energy-efficient production planning and operation of discrete manufacturing systems using data mining techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Chao Hung Wang & Wei‐Jr Juo, 2021. "An environmental policy of green intellectual capital: Green innovation strategy for performance sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3241-3254, November.
    4. Boyao Zhang & Ubaldo Comite & Ali Gokhan Yucel & Xintao Liu & Mohammed Arshad Khan & Shahid Husain & Muhammad Safdar Sial & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2021. "Unleashing the Importance of TQM and Knowledge Management for Organizational Sustainability in the Age of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Ngoc Phu Tran & Co Thi Huyen Dinh & Hien Thi Thu Hoang & Duc Hong Vo, 2022. "Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance in Vietnam: The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    6. José Vale & Rafaela Miranda & Graça Azevedo & Maria C. Tavares, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainable Intellectual Capital on Sustainable Performance: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Usama Awan & Marlen Gabriele Arnold & Ismail Gölgeci, 2021. "Enhancing green product and process innovation: Towards an integrative framework of knowledge acquisition and environmental investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1283-1295, February.
    8. Misbah Hayat Bhatti & Umair Akram & Muhammad Hasnat Bhatti & Hassan Rasool & Xin Su, 2020. "Unraveling the Effects of Ethical Leadership on Knowledge Sharing: The Mediating Roles of Subjective Well-Being and Social Media in the Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Argote, Linda & Ingram, Paul, 2000. "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 150-169, May.
    10. Hannah Trittin & Dennis Schoeneborn, 2017. "Diversity as Polyphony: Reconceptualizing Diversity Management from a Communication-Centered Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 305-322, August.
    11. Stefania Mariano & Yukika Awazu, 2017. "The role of collaborative knowledge building in the co-creation of artifacts: influencing factors and propositions," Post-Print hal-01744876, HAL.
    12. Snejina Michailova & Kate Hutchings, 2006. "National Cultural Influences on Knowledge Sharing: A Comparison of China and Russia," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 383-405, May.
    13. Rogers, John Geoffrey & Cooper, Samuel J. & Norman, Jon B., 2018. "Uses of industrial energy benchmarking with reference to the pulp and paper industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 23-37.
    14. Keng-Boon Ooi & Weng-Choong Cheah & Binshan Lin & Pei-Lee Teh, 2012. "TQM practices and knowledge sharing: An empirical study of Malaysia’s manufacturing organizations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 59-78, March.
    15. Chao Hung Wang, 2020. "An environmental perspective extends market orientation: Green innovation sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3123-3134, December.
    16. Asif Razzaq & Arshian Sharif & Paiman Ahmad & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2021. "Asymmetric role of tourism development and technology innovation on carbon dioxide emission reduction in the Chinese economy: Fresh insights from QARDL approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 176-193, January.
    17. Carlos M. Jardon & Xavier Martínez-Cobas, 2019. "Leadership and Organizational Culture in the Sustainability of Subsistence Small Businesses: An Intellectual Capital Based View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Jianwen Zhang & Jacob Cherian & Yawar Abbas Sandhu & Jawad Abbas & Laura Mariana Cismas & Constantin Viorel Negrut & Lucia Negrut, 2022. "Presumption of Green Electronic Appliances Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Personal Moral Norms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reza Dabestani & Allahvirdi Taghavi & Mohammad Saljoughian, 2014. "The Relationship between Total Quality Management Critical Success Factors and Knowledge Sharing in a Service Industry," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(1), pages 81-101, February.
    2. Nguyen Huynh Mai Tram & Bui Hoang Ngoc, 2024. "Environmental Foe or Friend: The Impact of Intellectual Capital and Ambidextrous Innovation on Environmental Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    3. Saira Begum & Muhammad Ashfaq & Enjun Xia & Usama Awan, 2022. "Does green transformational leadership lead to green innovation? The role of green thinking and creative process engagement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 580-597, January.
    4. Abla Chaouni Benabdellah & Kamar Zekhnini & Anass Cherrafi & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Anil Kumar, 2021. "Design for the environment: An ontology‐based knowledge management model for green product development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4037-4053, December.
    5. Wayne H. Stewart Jr. & Ruth C. May & Donna E. Ledgerwood, 2015. "Do You Know What I Know? Intent to Share Knowledge in the US and Ukraine," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 737-773, December.
    6. Darja Kukovec & Borut Milfelner & Matjaž Mulej & Simona Šarotar-Žižek, 2021. "Model of Socially Responsible Transfer of Parent Organization Culture to the Subsidiary Organization in a Foreign Cultural Environment Concerning Internal Communication, Stress, and Work Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Ying Tan & Feng Hai & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2022. "Minimizing Waste in the Food Supply Chain: Role of Information System, Supply Chain Strategy, and Network Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Chao‐Hung Wang & Wei‐Jr Juo, 2024. "Sustainable environmental performance: The mediating role of green reputation in the choice of green marketing or green demarketing," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1756-1768, May.
    9. Vishal Singh Patyal & K. Maddulety, 2015. "Interrelationship between Total Quality Management and Six Sigma: A Review," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(6), pages 1025-1060, December.
    10. Rafał Prusak & Edyta Kardas, 2024. "The Analysis of Mutual Relations and Dependencies of Intellectual Capital Components in Polish Enterprises in the Context of Sustainability Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Prusak Rafał, 2019. "Analysis of selected elements of knowledge management in the context of the size of the enterprise and the specifics of its activity," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 90-104, June.
    12. Di Luan & Hongjun Cao & Tongkun Qu, 2023. "How Does Corporate Green Innovation Strategy Translate into Green Innovation Performance Based on Chain Mediation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Li, Lingjia & Shan, Shuo & Dai, Jing & Che, Wen & Shou, Yongyi, 2022. "The impact of green supply chain management on green innovation: A meta-analysis from the inter-organizational learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    14. Patanjal Kumar & Suresh Kumar Jakhar & Arijit Bhattacharya, 2021. "Two‐period supply chain coordination strategies with ambidextrous sustainable innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2980-2995, November.
    15. Saira Begum & Muhammad Ashfaq & Kaveh Asiaei & Khuram Shahzad, 2023. "Green intellectual capital and green business strategy: The role of green absorptive capacity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4907-4923, November.
    16. Wei‐Jr Juo & Chao‐Hung Wang, 2022. "Does green innovation mediate the relationship between green relational view and competitive advantage?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2456-2468, July.
    17. Mohsin Shahzad & Ying Qu & Abaid Ullah Zafar & Andrea Appolloni, 2021. "Does the interaction between the knowledge management process and sustainable development practices boost corporate green innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4206-4222, December.
    18. Xiaofei Yan & Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia & Kalpina Kumari & Lucian Ionel Cioca, 2022. "Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Organizational Trust, and Corporate Reputation for Sustainable Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Mara Del Baldo & Federica Palazzi, 2023. "High-Growth Benefit Corporations: Leveraging on Intangibles—Insights from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2010. "How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 661-676, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13281-:d:1232939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.