IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12478-d1218725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demoethical Model of Sustainable Development of Society: A Roadmap towards Digital Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Rinat A. Zhanbayev

    (National Engineering Academy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 050010 Almaty, Kazakhstan)

  • Muhammad Irfan

    (School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
    Department of Business Administration, Ilma University, Karachi 75190, Pakistan)

  • Anna V. Shutaleva

    (Department of Philosophy, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
    Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines, Ural State Law University Named after V.F. Yakovlev, 620137 Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Daniil G. Maksimov

    (Department of Public Service and Personnel Management, Udmurt State University, 426034 Izhevsk, Russia)

  • Rimma Abdykadyrkyzy

    (Department of Public Relations, Abai University (Abai KazNPU), 050010 Almaty, Kazakhstan
    Department of Electronics, Telecommunications and Space Technologies, Institute of Automation and Information Technologies, Satbayev University (Satbayev KazNRTU), 050013 Almaty, Kazakhstan)

  • Şahin Filiz

    (Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Letter Antalya, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study aims to explore a demoethical model for sustainable development in modern society. It proposes an approach that focuses on organizing activities to improve sustainable development. Specifically, it presents a demoethical model relevant to Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 organizations. The objective is to identify demoethical values that can drive sustainable development in the era of digitalization. Through a literature review and analysis, this study identifies key components of the demoethical model and provides practical recommendations for stakeholders involved in digital transformation. The analysis of demoethical norms and phenomena, such as education, nurturing, mind, knowledge, science, and honest work, has enabled the identification of values that align with sustainable development in society. The results of the study demonstrate that the notion of a demoethical foundation for sustainability is rooted in the concept of spirituality as the basis for a new societal development scenario and its relationship with nature. The study shows that ideas about the demoethical basis of sustainability are based on the priority of spirituality as the basis of a new scenario for the development of society, as well as the integration of demographic, socio-economical, and ecological components in system-wide modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Rinat A. Zhanbayev & Muhammad Irfan & Anna V. Shutaleva & Daniil G. Maksimov & Rimma Abdykadyrkyzy & Şahin Filiz, 2023. "Demoethical Model of Sustainable Development of Society: A Roadmap towards Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12478-:d:1218725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter W. J. Batey & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2021. "Demo-economic Modeling: Review and Prospects," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 44(3-4), pages 328-362, May.
    2. Herbert A. Simon, 1991. "Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 125-134, February.
    3. Yuan Li & Nan Huang & Yang Zhao, 2022. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Enterprise Green Economic Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    4. João Pedro Baptista & Anabela Gradim, 2020. "Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Rinat Zhanbayev & Muhammad Irfan, 2022. "Industrial-Innovative Paradigm of Social Sustainability: Modeling the Assessment of Demoethical, Demographic, Democratic, and Demoeconomic Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Nuryazmin Ahmat Zainuri & Norshariani Abd-Rahman & Lilia Halim & Mee Yeang Chan & Nisa Nadirah Mohd Bazari, 2022. "Measuring Pro-Environmental Behavior Triggered by Environmental Values," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Jan Oosterhaven & John H. L. Dewhurst, 1990. "A Prototype Demo-Economic Model with an Application to Queensland," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 13(1-2), pages 51-64, April.
    8. Amy Verbos & Joseph Gerard & Paul Forshey & Charles Harding & Janice Miller, 2007. "The Positive Ethical Organization: Enacting a Living Code of Ethics and Ethical Organizational Identity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 17-33, November.
    9. Chaohui Xu & Xingtong Chen & Wei Dai, 2022. "Effects of Digital Transformation on Environmental Governance of Mining Enterprises: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Daniel Kahneman, 2003. "Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(5), pages 1449-1475, December.
    11. Timur Narbaev & Diana Amirbekova, 2021. "Research Productivity in Emerging Economies: Empirical Evidence from Kazakhstan," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Paul Slovic & Melissa L. Finucane & Ellen Peters & Donald G. MacGregor, 2004. "Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 311-322, April.
    13. Yang, Hao-Chang & Feng, Gen-Fu & Zhao, Xin Xin & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2022. "The impacts of energy insecurity on green innovation: A multi-country study," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 139-154.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcela Marçal Alves Pinto Mick & João Luiz Kovaleski & Rafael Luis Mick & Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli, 2024. "Developing a Sustainable Digital Transformation Roadmap for SMEs: Integrating Digital Maturity and Strategic Alignment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-30, October.
    2. Marcela Marçal Alves Pinto Mick & João Luiz Kovaleski & Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli, 2024. "Sustainable Digital Transformation Roadmaps for SMEs: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Diana Esses, 2024. "People Powering Progress: How Human ResourceInfluences Your Company’s Digitalization and Sustainable Growth," Cognitive Sustainability, Cognitive Sustainability Ltd., vol. 3(2), pages 4-10, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.
    2. Gerard P. Hodgkinson & Barbara Burkhard & Nicolai J. Foss & Dietmar Grichnik & Riikka M. Sarala & Yi Tang & Marc Van Essen, 2023. "The Heuristics and Biases of Top Managers: Past, Present, and Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1033-1063, July.
    3. Steven Rosefielde & Yiyi Liu, 2018. "Local Public Debt Management: Lessons From Greece In Inclusive Economic Perspective," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(04), pages 967-980, September.
    4. Violina P. Rindova & Luis L. Martins, 2018. "From Values to Value: Value Rationality and the Creation of Great Strategies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 323-334, March.
    5. Orit E. Tykocinski, 2013. "The insurance effect: How the possession of gas masks reduces the likelihood of a missile attack," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(2), pages 174-178, March.
    6. Marius Eisele & Christian Troost & Thomas Berger, 2021. "How Bayesian Are Farmers When Making Climate Adaptation Decisions? A Computer Laboratory Experiment for Parameterising Models of Expectation Formation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 805-828, September.
    7. Christoph M. Rheinberger & James K. Hammitt, 2018. "Dinner with Bayes: On the revision of risk beliefs," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 253-280, December.
    8. Riccardo Ferretti & Francesca Pancotto & Enrico Rubaltelli, 2016. "A test of the Behavioral versus the Rational model of Persuasion in Financial Advertising," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0059, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    9. Coralio Ballester & Penélope Hernández, 2010. "Bounded Rationality," ThE Papers 10/10, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    10. Jozef Barunik & Zdenek Drabek & Matej Nevrla, 2020. "Investment Disputes and Abnormal Volatility of Stocks," Papers 2006.10505, arXiv.org.
    11. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:174-178 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Savage David A., 2016. "Surviving the Storm: Behavioural Economics in the Conflict Environment," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 22(2), pages 105-129, April.
    13. Daniele Schilirò, 2012. "Bounded Rationality And Perfect Rationality: Psychology Into Economics," Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 99-108.
    14. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:4:p:365-385 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Riccardo Ferretti & Francesca Pancotto & Enrico Rubaltelli, 2016. "A test of the Behavioral versus the Rational model of Persuasion in Financial Advertising," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 16105, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    16. Alexander Kempf & Christoph Merkle & Alexandra Niessen†Ruenzi, 2014. "Low Risk and High Return – Affective Attitudes and Stock Market Expectations," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 20(5), pages 995-1030, November.
    17. Joyita Banerji & Kaushik Kundu & Parveen Ahmed Alam, 2023. "The Impact of Behavioral Biases on Individuals’ Financial Choices under Uncertainty: An Empirical Approach," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 401-424, September.
    18. Roger Jones, 2011. "The latest iteration of IPCC uncertainty guidance—an author perspective," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 733-743, October.
    19. Anne Maaike Mulders & Frank Tubergen, 2023. "The Role of Education in Native Dutch Adolescents’ Muslim Population Size Perceptions," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1137-1156, September.
    20. Gao, Hongzhi & Knight, John G. & Zhang, Hongxia & Mather, Damien, 2013. "Guilt by association: Heuristic risks for foreign brands during a product-harm crisis in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1044-1051.
    21. Markus A. Fitza, 2017. "How much do CEOs really matter? Reaffirming that the CEO effect is mostly due to chance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 802-811, March.
    22. Nebus, James & Chai, Kah Hin, 2014. "Putting the “psychic” Back in Psychic Distance: Awareness, Perceptions, and Understanding as Dimensions of Psychic Distance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 8-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12478-:d:1218725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.