IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12144-d1213131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconfiguring Farming Systems of Smallholders with Market-Led Approach: A Case Study in Northeast Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Arunee Promkhambut

    (Department of Agricultural Extension and Development, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Anan Polthanee

    (Department of Agronomy, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Buppha Simma

    (Department of Agronomy, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Jefferson Fox

    (East-West Center, Honolulu, HI 96848, USA)

  • A. T. Rambo

    (Program on System Approaches in Agriculture for Sustainable Development, Department of Agricultural Extension and Agricultural Systems, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

Abstract

Agricultural research and development organizations are under pressure to shift from increasing productivity of crops to increasing the profitability and competitiveness of smallholders and linking small-scale farmers to profitable markets. This paper discusses the efforts to assist small-scale farmers to become more sustainable and market oriented. Data were taken from a 5-year participatory action project in a village in Northeast Thailand during 2014–2018. We found that a market-led extension approach can enable farmers to optimize their returns from farming by selecting farm enterprises based on market opportunities for both existing and new products. Farmers need to apply post-harvesting management, including processing, grading, standardization of produce, value adding, packaging, branding, and certification in the process. Collaboration and long-term commitments on the part of scientists, local stakeholders, policymakers, and funding organizations need to be furthered strengthened.

Suggested Citation

  • Arunee Promkhambut & Anan Polthanee & Buppha Simma & Jefferson Fox & A. T. Rambo, 2023. "Reconfiguring Farming Systems of Smallholders with Market-Led Approach: A Case Study in Northeast Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12144-:d:1213131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nguyen Thi Anh, 2013. "One Village One Product (OVOP) in Japan to One Tambon One Product (OTOP) in Thailand: Lessons for Grass Root Development in Developing Countries," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 4(12), pages 529-537.
    2. Harriman Samuel Saragih & Jacob Donald Tan, 2018. "Co-innovation: a review and conceptual framework," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 361-377.
    3. Andreas Neef & Dieter Neubert, 2011. "Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(2), pages 179-194, June.
    4. Chambers, Robert, 1994. "The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 953-969, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jana Schindler & Frieder Graef & Hannes Jochen König & Devotha Mchau, 2017. "Developing community-based food security criteria in rural Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1285-1298, December.
    2. Pawera, Lukas & Manickam, Ravishankar & Wangungu, Carolyne & Bonnarith, Uon & Schreinemachers, Pepijn & Ramasamy, Srinivasan, 2024. "Guidance on farmer participation in the design, testing and scaling of agricultural innovations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. World Bank Group, 2012. "Understanding Access to Justice and Conflict Resolution at the Local Level in the Central African Republic," World Bank Publications - Reports 16097, The World Bank Group.
    4. Soltani, Arezoo & Angelsen, Arild & Eid, Tron & Naieni, Mohammad Saeid Noori & Shamekhi, Taghi, 2012. "Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 60-70.
    5. Xiaoran Zheng & Yuzhuo Cai, 2022. "Transforming Innovation Systems into Innovation Ecosystems: The Role of Public Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Yuzhuo Cai & Borja Ramis Ferrer & Jose Luis Martinez Lastra, 2019. "Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Davies-Colley, Christian & Smith, Willie, 2012. "Implementing environmental technologies in development situations: The example of ecological toilets," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-8.
    8. Yuling Ma & Jiajun Qiao & Dong Han, 2022. "Simulation and Prediction of Evolution of Specialized Villages Agglomeration Based on System Dynamics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Cai, Yuzhuo, 2023. "Towards a new model of EU-China innovation cooperation: Bridging missing links between international university collaboration and international industry collaboration," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Haicong Li & Lu Wang & Jianzhou Gong & A-Xing Zhu & Yueming Hu, 2021. "Land-Use Modes of the Dike–Pond System in the Pearl River Delta of China and Implications for Rural Revitalization," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Anton Eitzinger & Peter Läderach & Christian Bunn & Audberto Quiroga & Andreas Benedikter & Antonio Pantoja & Jason Gordon & Michele Bruni, 2014. "Implications of a changing climate on food security and smallholders’ livelihoods in Bogotá, Colombia," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 161-176, February.
    12. Eastwood, C.R. & Turner, F.J. & Romera, A.J., 2022. "Farmer-centred design: An affordances-based framework for identifying processes that facilitate farmers as co-designers in addressing complex agricultural challenges," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    13. repec:elg:eechap:14395_25 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. A. Fleming & S. Agrawal & Dinomika & Y. Fransisca & L. Graham & S. Lestari & D. Mendham & D. O’Connell & B. Paul & M. Po & A. Rawluk & N. Sakuntaladewi & B. Winarno & T. W. Yuwati, 2021. "Reflections on integrated research from community engagement in peatland restoration," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Ion Lucian Ceapraz & Fatma Fourati & Loïc Sauvée, 2023. "Prospects For The Transfer Of Innovation In The Rural World €“ The Case Of The Innovation Platform €Œchamps D’Innovation†In Normandy Region, France," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 17(1), pages 83-108, June.
    16. Suliasi Vunibola, 2023. "“Want to help someone? Shut up and listen”: Foreign aid, maladaptation, and community development practices in the Pacific," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S2), December.
    17. Ross, Heather M. & Pine, Kathleen H. & Curran, Sarah & Augusta, Dawn, 2022. "Pathway mapping as a tool to address police use of force in behavioral health crisis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    18. Carlos Abraham Moya & Vincent Boly & Laure Morel & Daniel Galvez & Mauricio Camargo, 2020. "Characterization of Best Practices for Customer/Supplier Collaboration in Co-innovation Projects," Post-Print hal-03134714, HAL.
    19. Margaret S. McMillan & William A. Masters & Harounan Kazianga, 2011. "Rural Demography, Public Services and Land Rights in Africa: A Village-Level Analysis in Burkina Faso," NBER Working Papers 17718, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Aurélie Cardona & Cristiana Carusi & Michael Mayerfeld Bell, 2021. "Engaged Intermediaries to Bridge the Gap between Scientists, Educational Practitioners and Farmers to Develop Sustainable Agri-Food Innovation Systems: A US Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    21. Moomen, Abdul–Wadood, 2017. "Strategies for managing large-scale mining sector land use conflicts in the global south," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 85-93.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12144-:d:1213131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.