IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p12072-d1212036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Multiple Macroalgae Cultivation Systems and End-Use Strategies of Saccharina latissima and Gracilaria tikvahiae Based on Techno-Economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Jingjing Wu

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Ave., Potsdam, NY 13699-5710, USA)

  • Shane W. Rogers

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Ave., Potsdam, NY 13699-5710, USA)

  • Rebekah Schaummann

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Ave., Potsdam, NY 13699-5710, USA)

  • Nichole N. Price

    (Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, 60 Bigelow Dr., East Boothbay, ME 04544-0380, USA)

Abstract

Macroalgae can be processed into various products with the potential to substitute land-based crops; their cultivation can bioextract nutrients from coastal waters. This study investigated the economic cost and environmental impacts of multiple seaweed cultivation platforms, cultivation strategies, and processing/end-use strategies through techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) with a focus on Saccharina latissima and Gracilaria tikvahiae . Cultivation platforms included single-layer longline, dual-layer longline, single-layer strip, and dual-layer strip systems. Processing/end-use products included seaweed to biofuel, dried sea vegetables, marketable commercial fertilizer, and animal feed. Economic and environmental costs decreased with dual-layer and strip cultivation systems. Cultivation costs were highest using the common single-layer longline system ($4.44 kg −1 dry weight (dw) S. latissima and $6.73 kg −1 dw G. tikvahiae when cultivated on rotation). The use of the dual-layer strip system reduced cultivation costs to $2.19 kg −1 dw for S. latissima and $3.43 kg −1 dw for G. tikvahiae . Seaweed drying was the major contributor to economic and environmental costs for macroalgae processing. Yet, all scenarios achieved environmental benefits for marine eutrophication. The best environmental performance was observed when biomass was processed to dry sea vegetables, assuming the offset of land-based vegetable production, or used as biofeedstock for anaerobic digestion for combined heat and power.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingjing Wu & Shane W. Rogers & Rebekah Schaummann & Nichole N. Price, 2023. "A Comparison of Multiple Macroalgae Cultivation Systems and End-Use Strategies of Saccharina latissima and Gracilaria tikvahiae Based on Techno-Economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12072-:d:1212036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12072/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12072/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damiano Spagnuolo & Valentino Russo & Antonio Manghisi & Antonio Di Martino & Marina Morabito & Giuseppa Genovese & Patrizia Trifilò, 2022. "Screening on the Presence of Plant Growth Regulators in High Biomass Forming Seaweeds from the Ionian Sea (Mediterranean Sea)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Michelle Dias Hornes da Rosa & Cristina Jansen Alves & Felipe Nardo dos Santos & Alexander Ossanes de Souza & Elessandra da Rosa Zavareze & Ernani Pinto & Miguel Daniel Noseda & Daniela Ramos & Cláudi, 2023. "Macroalgae and Microalgae Biomass as Feedstock for Products Applied to Bioenergy and Food Industry: A Brief Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Fernand, Francois & Israel, Alvaro & Skjermo, Jorunn & Wichard, Thomas & Timmermans, Klaas R. & Golberg, Alexander, 2017. "Offshore macroalgae biomass for bioenergy production: Environmental aspects, technological achievements and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 35-45.
    4. Yining Chen & Lan Lan & Jing Zhang & Qiaohan Wang & Yan Liu & Huiru Li & Qingli Gong & Xu Gao, 2023. "Physiological Impacts of Nitrogen Starvation and Subsequent Recovery on the Red Seaweed Grateloupia turuturu (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Allen, Eoin & Wall, David M. & Herrmann, Christiane & Xia, Ao & Murphy, Jerry D., 2015. "What is the gross energy yield of third generation gaseous biofuel sourced from seaweed?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 352-360.
    6. Sara García-Poza & Adriana Leandro & Carla Cotas & João Cotas & João C. Marques & Leonel Pereira & Ana M. M. Gonçalves, 2020. "The Evolution Road of Seaweed Aquaculture: Cultivation Technologies and the Industry 4.0," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-42, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences & Interagency Working Group for Farming Seaweeds and Seagrasses & Editors: & Price, Nichole N. & Rexroad, Caird & Quigley, Charlotte & Stamieszkin, Karen & Langto, 2024. "Farming Seagrasses and Seaweeds: Responsible Restoration & Revenue Generation," USDA Miscellaneous 347311, United States Department of Agriculture.
    2. Kouhgardi, Esmaeil & Zendehboudi, Sohrab & Mohammadzadeh, Omid & Lohi, Ali & Chatzis, Ioannis, 2023. "Current status and future prospects of biofuel production from brown algae in North America: Progress and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Kostas, Emily T. & Adams, Jessica M.M. & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Durán-Jiménez, Gabriela & Lye, Gary J., 2021. "Macroalgal biorefinery concepts for the circular bioeconomy: A review on biotechnological developments and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Allen, Eoin & Wall, David M. & Herrmann, Christiane & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "A detailed assessment of resource of biomethane from first, second and third generation substrates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 656-665.
    6. Chung-Yiin Wong & Siti-Suhailah Rosli & Yoshimitsu Uemura & Yeek Chia Ho & Arunsri Leejeerajumnean & Worapon Kiatkittipong & Chin-Kui Cheng & Man-Kee Lam & Jun-Wei Lim, 2019. "Potential Protein and Biodiesel Sources from Black Soldier Fly Larvae: Insights of Larval Harvesting Instar and Fermented Feeding Medium," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Ding, Lingkan & Chan Gutierrez, Enrique & Cheng, Jun & Xia, Ao & O'Shea, Richard & Guneratnam, Amita Jacob & Murphy, Jerry D., 2018. "Assessment of continuous fermentative hydrogen and methane co-production using macro- and micro-algae with increasing organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 760-770.
    8. Sharma, Rozi & Malaviya, Piyush, 2023. "Ecosystem services and climate action from a circular bioeconomy perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Czyrnek-Delêtre, Magdalena M. & Rocca, Stefania & Agostini, Alessandro & Giuntoli, Jacopo & Murphy, Jerry D., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of seaweed biomethane, generated from seaweed sourced from integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in temperate oceanic climates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 34-50.
    10. Guiyan Zang & Jianan Zhang & Junxi Jia & Nathaniel Weger & Albert Ratner, 2019. "Clean Poultry Energy System Design Based on Biomass Gasification Technology: Thermodynamic and Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Enrique Salgado-Hernández & Ángel Isauro Ortiz-Ceballos & Sergio Martínez-Hernández & Erik Samuel Rosas-Mendoza & Ana Elena Dorantes-Acosta & Andrea Alvarado-Vallejo & Alejandro Alvarado-Lassman, 2022. "Methane Production of Sargassum spp. Biomass from the Mexican Caribbean: Solid–Liquid Separation and Component Distribution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. John J. Milledge & Birthe V. Nielsen & Supattra Maneein & Patricia J. Harvey, 2019. "A Brief Review of Anaerobic Digestion of Algae for Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Kumar, Kanhaiya & Ghosh, Supratim & Angelidaki, Irini & Holdt, Susan L. & Karakashev, Dimitar B. & Morales, Merlin Alvarado & Das, Debabrata, 2016. "Recent developments on biofuels production from microalgae and macroalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 235-249.
    14. Simona Armeli Minicante & Lucia Bongiorni & Amelia De Lazzari, 2022. "Bio-Based Products from Mediterranean Seaweeds: Italian Opportunities and Challenges for a Sustainable Blue Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Montingelli, Maria E. & Benyounis, Khaled Y. & Quilty, Brid & Stokes, Joseph & Olabi, Abdul G., 2016. "Optimisation of biogas production from the macroalgae Laminaria sp. at different periods of harvesting in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 671-682.
    16. Heejung Jung & Jaai Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2018. "Biomethanation of Harmful Macroalgal Biomass in Leach-Bed Reactor Coupled to Anaerobic Filter: Effect of Water Regime and Filter Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Vladimir Pishchalnik & Stanislav Myslenkov & Elena Latkovskaya & Victor Arkhipkin, 2024. "Assessment of the Hydrochemical Characteristics of the Carbon Observational Site ‘Carbon-Sakhalin’ (Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-36, April.
    18. Sudhakar, K. & Mamat, R. & Samykano, M. & Azmi, W.H. & Ishak, W.F.W. & Yusaf, Talal, 2018. "An overview of marine macroalgae as bioresource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 165-179.
    19. Mohammed E. El-Mahrouk & Yaser H. Dewir & Yaser M. Hafez & Antar El-Banna & Farahat S. Moghanm & Hassan El-Ramady & Qaisar Mahmood & Fathy Elbehiry & Eric C. Brevik, 2023. "Assessment of Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals and Their Ecological Risk in Sea Lettuce ( Ulva spp.) along the Coast Alexandria, Egypt: Implications for Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Mhatre, Apurv & Gore, Suhas & Mhatre, Akanksha & Trivedi, Nitin & Sharma, Manju & Pandit, Reena & Anil, Annamma & Lali, Arvind, 2019. "Effect of multiple product extractions on bio-methane potential of marine macrophytic green alga Ulva lactuca," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 742-751.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12072-:d:1212036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.