IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11564-d1203208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Melbourne Metro Train Passengers’ Pre-Boarding Behaviors and Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Yang

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Nirajan Shiwakoti

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Richard Tay

    (School of Business IT and Logistics, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

The focus on sustainable transportation has increased interest in promoting sustainable modes of transport, such as rail. Understanding train passengers’ behaviors and perceptions is essential to enhance their travel experience and increase train ridership. Pre-boarding behaviors and perceptions are crucial in shaping the overall train travel experience. However, there are limited studies that have developed a systematic framework for investigating train passengers’ pre-boarding behaviors and perceptions. This paper examines the train passenger’s pre-boarding behaviors and perceptions about the station and platform. The study adopts a mixed-methods approach by developing a pre-boarding decision framework and combining it with questionnaire surveys to explore passengers’ behaviors and perceptions on the platform before boarding. A total of 429 valid responses from Melbourne metro train users were used for analysis. Descriptive statistics and correlation techniques were applied to identify patterns and relationships. The findings reveal common pre-boarding behaviors and perceptions. Furthermore, the study uncovers factors influencing these behaviors and perceptions, such as passenger demographics, travel patterns, and specific trip characteristics. For example, carrying large items and travel frequency significantly impact passengers’ travel experience in the pre-boarding phase. Waiting time, group travel, carrying small items, gender, and age group also significantly impact some pre-boarding behavior variables. Travel time, on the other hand, makes no significant impact on any of the pre-boarding variables that we examined. This research provides valuable insights for rail service operators and policymakers to enhance the pre-boarding experience, optimize station design, and improve passenger satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Yang & Nirajan Shiwakoti & Richard Tay, 2023. "Exploring Melbourne Metro Train Passengers’ Pre-Boarding Behaviors and Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11564-:d:1203208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11564/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11564/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Kyung Min & Hong, Sung-Pil & Ko, Suk-Joon & Kim, Dowon, 2015. "Does crowding affect the path choice of metro passengers?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 292-304.
    2. Kim, Hyunmi & Kwon, Sohee & Wu, Seung Kook & Sohn, Keemin, 2014. "Why do passengers choose a specific car of a metro train during the morning peak hours?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 249-258.
    3. Jiping Fang & Taku Fujiyama & Howard Wong, 2019. "Modelling passenger distribution on metro platforms based on passengers’ choices for boarding cars," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 442-458, July.
    4. Hoogendoorn, S. P. & Bovy, P. H. L., 2004. "Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 169-190, February.
    5. Jie Yang & Nirajan Shiwakoti & Richard Tay, 2023. "Passengers’ Perception of Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Travel Experience Attributes: Results from an Australian Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Di & Yang, Yuwei & Peng, Xinyi & Huang, Jiangyan & Mo, Pengli & Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Shuaian, 2024. "Modelling the pedestrian’s willingness to walk on the subway platform: A novel approach to analyze in-vehicle crowd congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Xu, Xin-yue & Liu, Jun & Li, Hai-ying & Jiang, Man, 2016. "Capacity-oriented passenger flow control under uncertain demand: Algorithm development and real-world case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 130-148.
    3. Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Wei & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 318-335.
    4. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2019. "When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-69.
    5. Liudan Jiao & Liyin Shen & Chenyang Shuai & Yongtao Tan & Bei He, 2017. "Measuring Crowdedness between Adjacent Stations in an Urban Metro System: a Chinese Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Yizhou Zhang & Erik Jenelius & Karl Kottenhoff, 2017. "Impact of real-time crowding information: a Stockholm metro pilot study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 483-499, October.
    7. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Scarinci, Riccardo, 2016. "Assessing the usage and level-of-service of pedestrian facilities in train stations: A Swiss case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 106-123.
    8. Hänseler, Flurin S. & van den Heuvel, Jeroen P.A. & Cats, Oded & Daamen, Winnie & Hoogendoorn, Serge P., 2020. "A passenger-pedestrian model to assess platform and train usage from automated data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 948-968.
    9. Xianing Wang & Zhan Zhang & Ying Wang & Jun Yang & Linjun Lu, 2022. "A Study on Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Flows Based on Partial Impact Dynamics by Real-Time Data in Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Joohyun Lee & Mardelle McCuskey Shepley, 2020. "College Campuses and Student Walkability: Assessing the Impact of Smartphone Use on Student Perception and Evaluation of Urban Campus Routes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Jie Xu & Yao Ning & Heng Wei & Wei Xie & Jianyuan Guo & Limin Jia & Yong Qin, 2015. "Route Choice in Subway Station during Morning Peak Hours: A Case of Guangzhou Subway," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-8, March.
    12. Lin, Joanne Yuh-Jye & Jenelius, Erik & Cebecauer, Matej & Rubensson, Isak & Chen, Cynthia, 2023. "The equity of public transport crowding exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Aura-Luciana Istrate & Vojtěch Bosák & Alexandr Nováček & Ondřej Slach, 2020. "How Attractive for Walking Are the Main Streets of a Shrinking City?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Hoogendoorn, Serge P. & Bovy, Piet H. L., 2004. "Dynamic user-optimal assignment in continuous time and space," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 571-592, August.
    15. Ji, Yanjie & Gao, Liangpeng & Chen, Dandan & Ma, Xinwei & Zhang, Ruochen, 2018. "How does a static measure influence passengers’ boarding behaviors and bus dwell time? Simulated evidence from Nanjing bus stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 13-25.
    16. Korbmacher, Raphael & Dang, Huu-Tu & Tordeux, Antoine, 2024. "Predicting pedestrian trajectories at different densities: A multi-criteria empirical analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 634(C).
    17. Mohammed Mahmod Shuaib, 2016. "Modeling the Pedestrian Ability of Detecting Lanes and Lane Changing Behavior," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(7), pages 1-1, July.
    18. Zhang, Yihao & Chai, Zhaojie & Lykotrafitis, George, 2021. "Deep reinforcement learning with a particle dynamics environment applied to emergency evacuation of a room with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    19. Hong, Sung-Pil & Kim, Kyung min & Byeon, Geunyeong & Min, Yun-Hong, 2017. "A method to directly derive taste heterogeneity of travellers’ route choice in public transport from observed routes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 41-52.
    20. Marija Nikolić & Michel Bierlaire & Matthieu de Lapparent & Riccardo Scarinci, 2019. "Multiclass Speed-Density Relationship for Pedestrian Traffic," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 642-664, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11564-:d:1203208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.