IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p6060-d390982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Attractive for Walking Are the Main Streets of a Shrinking City?

Author

Listed:
  • Aura-Luciana Istrate

    (Department of Human Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 70200 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Vojtěch Bosák

    (Department of Human Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 70200 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Alexandr Nováček

    (Department of Human Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 70200 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Ondřej Slach

    (Department of Human Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 70200 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This research assesses the way main streets are perceived and used by pedestrians in an industrial, Central-European city—Ostrava in Czechia. The city has recently experienced shrinkage and changing patterns of socio-economic exchange, reason why this research is timely and needed in view of city center regeneration. Four main streets have been purposefully selected for this study. The research methods include questionnaires with street users (n = 297), direct observations of human activities and pedestrian counting. A link between business types and the way the street is experienced emerged. Results also indicate that vacant and unproperly managed spaces negatively affect the desire to walk on main streets. Furthermore, pedestrian volumes coupled with the amount of static activities determined several benchmark conditions for lively street segments. This research provides recommendations for policy-making and design and planning practice for regeneration of industrial city centers undergoing commercial and spatial transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Aura-Luciana Istrate & Vojtěch Bosák & Alexandr Nováček & Ondřej Slach, 2020. "How Attractive for Walking Are the Main Streets of a Shrinking City?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6060-:d:390982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6060/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6060/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saehoon Kim, 2019. "Design strategies to respond to the challenges of shrinking city," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 49-64, January.
    2. Bradley Bereitschaft, 2017. "Equity in Microscale Urban Design and Walkability: A Photographic Survey of Six Pittsburgh Streetscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and Cities," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 39-51, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Hoogendoorn, S. P. & Bovy, P. H. L., 2004. "Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 169-190, February.
    5. Dieter Rink & Chris Couch & Annegret Haase & Robert Krzysztofik & Bogdan Nadolu & Petr Rumpel, 2014. "The governance of urban shrinkage in cities of post-socialist Europe: policies, strategies and actors," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 258-277, September.
    6. Ondřej Slach & Vojtěch Bosák & Luděk Krtička & Alexandr Nováček & Petr Rumpel, 2019. "Urban Shrinkage and Sustainability: Assessing the Nexus between Population Density, Urban Structures and Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Borgers, A. & Timmermans, H. J. P., 1986. "City centre entry points, store location patterns and pedestrian route choice behaviour: A microlevel simulation model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 25-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mona Jabbari & Fernando Fonseca & Rui Ramos, 2021. "Accessibility and Connectivity Criteria for Assessing Walkability: An Application in Qazvin, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    2. M. Francisca Lima & Catharine Ward Thompson & Peter Aspinall, 2020. "Friendly Communities and Outdoor Spaces in Contexts of Urban Population Decline," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Mendiate, Classio Joao & Nkurunziza, Alphonse & Machanguana, Constancio Augusto & Bernardo, Roberto, 2022. "Pedestrian travel behaviour and urban form: Comparing two small Mozambican cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Kestutis Zaleckis & Szymon Chmielewski & Jūratė Kamičaitytė & Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske & Halina Lipińska, 2022. "Walkability Compass—A Space Syntax Solution for Comparative Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruiying Liu, 2022. "Long-Term Development Perspectives in the Slow Crisis of Shrinkage: Strategies of Coping and Exiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga, 2021. "Does One Decade of Urban Policy for the Shrinking City Make Visible Progress in Urban Re-Urbanization? A Case Study of Bytom, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Canca, David & Zarzo, Alejandro & Algaba, Encarnación & Barrena, Eva, 2013. "Macroscopic attraction-based simulation of pedestrian mobility: A dynamic individual route-choice approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 428-442.
    4. Haghani, Milad, 2021. "The knowledge domain of crowd dynamics: Anatomy of the field, pioneering studies, temporal trends, influential entities and outside-domain impact," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    5. Mihail Eva & Alexandra Cehan & Alexandra Lazăr, 2021. "Patterns of Urban Shrinkage: A Systematic Analysis of Romanian Cities (1992–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Raffaello Bronzini & Paolo Piselli, 2006. "Determinants of long-run regional productivity: the role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 597, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. Dominic Regan & Gene Tunny, 2008. "Venture capital in Australia," Economic Roundup, The Treasury, Australian Government, issue 1, pages 1-13, March.
    8. Xianing Wang & Zhan Zhang & Ying Wang & Jun Yang & Linjun Lu, 2022. "A Study on Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Flows Based on Partial Impact Dynamics by Real-Time Data in Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Joohyun Lee & Mardelle McCuskey Shepley, 2020. "College Campuses and Student Walkability: Assessing the Impact of Smartphone Use on Student Perception and Evaluation of Urban Campus Routes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Jie Xu & Yao Ning & Heng Wei & Wei Xie & Jianyuan Guo & Limin Jia & Yong Qin, 2015. "Route Choice in Subway Station during Morning Peak Hours: A Case of Guangzhou Subway," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-8, March.
    11. Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    12. David Rigby, 2012. "The Geography of Knowledge Relatedness and Technological Diversification in U.S. Cities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1218, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2012.
    13. Taylor Shelton & Matthew Zook & Alan Wiig, 2015. "Editor's choice The ‘actually existing smart city’," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 13-25.
    14. Ana María Fernández-Maldonado & Arie Romein, 2012. "The Sustainability of Knowledge-related Policies in Technology-based Cities in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Creative Knowledge Cities, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Lirong Kou & Mei-Po Kwan & Yanwei Chai, 2021. "The effects of activity-related contexts on individual sound exposures: A time–geographic approach to soundscape studies," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 2073-2092, September.
    16. Jie Yang & Nirajan Shiwakoti & Richard Tay, 2023. "Exploring Melbourne Metro Train Passengers’ Pre-Boarding Behaviors and Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Belenesi Marioara & Bogdan Victoria & Popa Dorina, 2013. "Measures Investingating The Characteristics Of Accounting In Knowledge-Based Economy. Study Regarding The Evolution Of The Romanian Ict Industry In 2007-2011," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 485-497, December.
    18. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Karol Szuniewicz, 2021. "Socio-Spatial Aspects of Shrinking Municipalities: A Case Study of the Post-Communist Region of North-East Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & David Rigby & Ron Boschma, 2015. "The technological resilience of US cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 167-184.
    20. Bartłomiej T. Sroka, 2022. "Urban Shrinkage as a Catalyst of a Transition, Revolving around Definitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6060-:d:390982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.