IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11363-d1199374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Smallholder Farmers’ Willingness to Sustain Cooperation with New Farmers—Analysis Based on the Perspective of Smallholder Farmers’ Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Liancui Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China
    Zhejiang Institute of Rural Revitalization, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Runjie Du

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Qiang Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China
    Zhejiang Institute of Rural Revitalization, Hangzhou 311300, China)

Abstract

In the context of rural revitalization, it is important to promote the establishment of lasting cooperation between small farmers and new farmers to drive farmers to increase their income and achieve common prosperity. Based on the research data of 342 small farmers in six provinces, the article empirically analyzes the willingness of small farmers to continue cooperation with new farmers in the future from the perspective of satisfaction using an ordered logistic model. The research results show that small farmers’ satisfaction with the benefit linkage model, with the benefit distribution, and with benefit dispute handling positively and significantly influence small farmers’ willingness to continue cooperation with new farmers in the future. For every 1% increase in satisfaction with the benefit linkage model, the probability of continuing to cooperate with new farmers in the future increases by 9.40%, and for every 1% increase in satisfaction with the benefit distribution and satisfaction with benefit dispute handling, the probability of continuing to cooperate with new farmers increases by 7.30% and 9.40%, respectively. Accordingly, this paper puts forward policy suggestions such as respecting the choice of interest linkage model of small farmers, improving the benefit distribution mechanism, and handling cooperation disputes reasonably, in order to improve the satisfaction of small farmers’ cooperation, promote the construction of lasting cooperation between small farmers and new farmers, and build a rural community of interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Liancui Wu & Runjie Du & Qiang Liu, 2023. "A Study on Smallholder Farmers’ Willingness to Sustain Cooperation with New Farmers—Analysis Based on the Perspective of Smallholder Farmers’ Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11363-:d:1199374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. James Rhodes, 1983. "The Large Agricultural Cooperative as a Competitor," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(5), pages 1090-1095.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Marini & Alberto Zevi, 2011. "‘Just one of us’: consumers playing oligopoly in mixed markets," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 239-263, November.
    2. Azzeddine Azzam & Hans Andersson, 2008. "Measuring Price Effects of Concentration in Mixed Oligopoly: An Application to the Swedish Beef-slaughter Industry," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 21-31, March.
    3. Tennbakk, Berit, 1992. "The Case of Cooperative Mixed Duopoly," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt8wp406w7, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    4. Sorensen, Ann-Christin, 2005. "Mixed Markets in the Food Processing Industry," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24741, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Marco A. MARINI & Paolo POLIDORI & Desiree TEOBALDELLI & Alberto ZEVI, 2015. "Welfare Enhancing Coordination In Consumer Cooperatives Under Mixed Oligopoly," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(3), pages 505-527, September.
    6. Berit Tennbakk, 1995. "Marketing Cooperatives In Mixed Duopolies," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 33-45, January.
    7. Xin Deng & Lingzhi Zhang & Rong Xu & Miao Zeng & Qiang He & Dingde Xu & Yanbin Qi, 2022. "Do Cooperatives Affect Groundwater Protection? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Theuvsen, Ludwig & Franz, Annabell, 2007. "The Role and Success Factors of Livestock Trading Cooperatives: Lessons from German Pork Production," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23.
    9. Gian Nicola Francesconi & Fleur Wouterse, 2022. "The potential of land shareholding cooperatives for inclusive agribusiness development in Africa," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 161-176, March.
    10. Petraglia, Lisa M. & Rogers, Richard T., 1991. "The Impact of Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives on Market Performance in U.S. Food Manufacturing Industries for 1982," Research Reports 25175, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    11. Mustafa Kara & Sinem Yüksel Çendek & Armağan Örki, 2020. "Applications And Suggestions For Increasing The Foreign Trade Performances Of Agricultural Cooperatives: The Case Of Thrace," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 14(1), pages 35-45.
    12. Tennbakk, Berit, 2002. "Cooperatives, Regulation and Competition in Norwegian Agriculture," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24907, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Gian Nicola FRANCESCONI & Fleur WOUTERSE, 2019. "Building The Managerial Capital Of Agricultural Cooperatives In Africa," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(1), pages 141-159, March.
    14. Jianjun Zhang & Yali Wang & Xiaomeng Zhang & Baoyindureng, 2023. "Influence Mechanism of Green Supply Chain Interest Linkage of Grassland Livestock Products: A Study from the Perspective of Pastoral Modernization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Jianying Xiao & Yan Song & Heyuan You, 2020. "Explaining Peasants’ Intention and Behavior of Farmland Trusteeship in China: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Han, Saim Woo, 1992. "A production and pricing decision model for the Korean agricultural cooperatives," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000010995, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    17. Deimel, Mark & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2011. "Networking in Meat Production Systems: The Influence of Cooperative Structures on Farmers’ Participation," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, September.
    18. Riley, Mark & Sangster, Heather & Smith, Hugh & Chiverrell, Richard & Boyle, John, 2018. "Will farmers work together for conservation? The potential limits of farmers’ cooperation in agri-environment measures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 635-646.
    19. Kalogeras, Nikos & van der Lans, Ivo A.C.M. & Pennings, Joost M.E. & van Dijk, Gert, 2004. "Members' Preferences For Cooperative Structures: An Experimental Conjoint Study," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20292, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11363-:d:1199374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.