IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10342-d1183686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brief Overview of Refuse-Derived Fuel Production and Energetic Valorization: Applied Technology and Main Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Santa Margarida Santos

    (VALORIZA—Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorization, Portalegre Polytechnic Institute, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal
    MEtRICs—Mechanical Engineering and Resource Sustainability Center, Department of Science and Technology of Biomass, FCT-NOVA, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • Catarina Nobre

    (VALORIZA—Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorization, Portalegre Polytechnic Institute, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal)

  • Paulo Brito

    (VALORIZA—Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorization, Portalegre Polytechnic Institute, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal)

  • Margarida Gonçalves

    (VALORIZA—Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorization, Portalegre Polytechnic Institute, 7300-555 Portalegre, Portugal
    MEtRICs—Mechanical Engineering and Resource Sustainability Center, Department of Science and Technology of Biomass, FCT-NOVA, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

Abstract

A large part of municipal solid waste (MSW) still goes to landfills, representing an environmental concern. A circular economy approach can enable safe management of MSW while mitigating the increasing energy needs when waste is used as a feedstock in energy production processes (waste to energy). Currently, MSW can be converted into refuse-derived fuel (RDF) through mechanical and biological treatment processes. This study analyzes the status of MSW and RDF production, as well as its main destinations in Portugal and Europe. The legislation applied, possible energy-recovery routes, and challenges associated with energy recovery are discussed throughout this paper. This research finds that the production of RDF in Portugal has been neglected, mostly because of RDF composition being quite heterogeneous and its poor fuel properties. Therefore, the need to improve and upgrade the characteristics and properties of RDF for waste-to-energy processes was detected. RDF can be pretreated to be further applied to waste-to-energy and waste-to-gas processes, such as incineration and gasification. The technology readiness level data, costs, and SWOT analysis allowedto assess that although incineration is the most mature and widely used technology, gasification becomes more attractive, having lower costs and gaseous emissions, proving to be more efficient and sustainable for MSW and RDF conversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Santa Margarida Santos & Catarina Nobre & Paulo Brito & Margarida Gonçalves, 2023. "Brief Overview of Refuse-Derived Fuel Production and Energetic Valorization: Applied Technology and Main Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10342-:d:1183686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10342/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10342/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Safar, Korai Muhammad & Bux, Mahar Rasool & Faria, Uqaili & Pervez, Shaikh, 2021. "Integrated model of municipal solid waste management for energy recovery in Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Mlonka-Mędrala, Agata & Dziok, Tadeusz & Magdziarz, Aneta & Nowak, Wojciech, 2021. "Composition and properties of fly ash collected from a multifuel fluidized bed boiler co-firing refuse derived fuel (RDF) and hard coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Nobre, Catarina & Vilarinho, Cândida & Alves, Octávio & Mendes, Benilde & Gonçalves, Margarida, 2019. "Upgrading of refuse derived fuel through torrefaction and carbonization: Evaluation of RDF char fuel properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 66-76.
    4. Cullen, Jonathan M. & Allwood, Julian M., 2010. "The efficient use of energy: Tracing the global flow of energy from fuel to service," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 75-81, January.
    5. Sharma, Bhasha & Goswami, Yagyadatta & Sharma, Shreya & Shekhar, Shashank, 2021. "Inherent roadmap of conversion of plastic waste into energy and its life cycle assessment: A frontrunner compendium," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. Chavando, José Antonio Mayoral & Silva, Valter Bruno & Tarelho, Luís A.C. & Cardoso, João Sousa & Eusébio, Daniela, 2022. "Snapshot review of refuse-derived fuels," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Piotr Brożek & Ewelina Złoczowska & Marek Staude & Karolina Baszak & Mariusz Sosnowski & Katarzyna Bryll, 2022. "Study of the Combustion Process for Two Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) Streams Using Statistical Methods and Heat Recovery Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Hamid Rezaei & Fahimeh Yazdan Panah & C. Jim Lim & Shahab Sokhansanj, 2020. "Pelletization of Refuse-Derived Fuel with Varying Compositions of Plastic, Paper, Organic and Wood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-11, June.
    9. Na, Jae Ik & Park, So Jin & Kim, Yong Koo & Lee, Jae Goo & Kim, Jae Ho, 2003. "Characteristics of oxygen-blown gasification for combustible waste in a fixed-bed gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(3-4), pages 275-285, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcelina Bury & Tadeusz Dziok & Karel Borovec & Piotr Burmistrz, 2023. "Influence of RDF Composition on Mercury Release during Thermal Pretreatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Gałko, Grzegorz & Mazur, Izabela & Rejdak, Michał & Jagustyn, Barbara & Hrabak, Joanna & Ouadi, Miloud & Jahangiri, Hessam & Sajdak, Marcin, 2023. "Evaluation of alternative refuse-derived fuel use as a valuable resource in various valorised applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    3. Yang, Honghua & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng, 2023. "Tracing China's steel use from steel flows in the production system to steel footprints in the consumption system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Omar Shafqat & Elena Malakhtka & Nina Chrobot & Per Lundqvist, 2021. "End Use Energy Services Framework Co-Creation with Multiple Stakeholders—A Living Lab-Based Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Buentello-Montoya, D.A. & Duarte-Ruiz, C.A. & Maldonado-Escalante, J.F., 2023. "Co-gasification of waste PET, PP and biomass for energy recovery: A thermodynamic model to assess the produced syngas quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    6. Kim, Yeong Jae & Wilson, Charlie, 2019. "Analysing energy innovation portfolios from a systemic perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Botakoz Suleimenova & Berik Aimbetov & Daulet Zhakupov & Dhawal Shah & Yerbol Sarbassov, 2022. "Co-Firing of Refuse-Derived Fuel with Ekibastuz Coal in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor: Analysis of Emissions and Ash Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Cullen, Jonathan M. & Allwood, Julian M., 2010. "Theoretical efficiency limits for energy conversion devices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2059-2069.
    9. Brand-Correa, Lina I. & Steinberger, Julia K., 2017. "A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 43-52.
    10. Jin, Taeyoung, 2022. "Impact of heat and electricity consumption on energy intensity: A panel data analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    11. Kumar, Aman & Singh, Ekta & Mishra, Rahul & Lo, Shang Lien & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Global trends in municipal solid waste treatment technologies through the lens of sustainable energy development opportunity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Ouyang, Tiancheng & Su, Zixiang & Yang, Rui & Wang, Zhiping & Mo, Xiaoyu & Huang, Haozhong, 2021. "Advanced waste heat harvesting strategy for marine dual-fuel engine considering gas-liquid two-phase flow of turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Kumar, Manish & Bolan, Shiv & Padhye, Lokesh P. & Konarova, Muxina & Foong, Shin Ying & Lam, Su Shiung & Wagland, Stuart & Cao, Runzi & Li, Yang & Batalha, Nuno & Ahmed, Mohamed & Pandey, Ashok & Sidd, 2023. "Retrieving back plastic wastes for conversion to value added petrochemicals: opportunities, challenges and outlooks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    14. Saha, Chayan Kumer & Nandi, Rajesh & Akter, Shammi & Hossain, Samira & Kabir, Kazi Bayzid & Kirtania, Kawnish & Islam, Md Tahmid & Guidugli, Laura & Reza, M. Toufiq & Alam, Md Monjurul, 2024. "Technical prospects and challenges of anaerobic co-digestion in Bangladesh: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jeremy Fouillou & Richard C. Lupton & Ana Gonzalez Hernandez & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Calculating the chemical exergy of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 274-287, April.
    16. Ihsanullah Sohoo & Marco Ritzkowski & Zubair Ahmed Sohu & Senem Önen Cinar & Zhi Kai Chong & Kerstin Kuchta, 2021. "Estimation of Methane Production and Electrical Energy Generation from Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Sites in Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Chadwick, Dara T. & McDonnell, Kevin P. & Brennan, Liam P. & Fagan, Colette C. & Everard, Colm D., 2014. "Evaluation of infrared techniques for the assessment of biomass and biofuel quality parameters and conversion technology processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 672-681.
    18. Biying Yu & Guangpu Zhao & Runying An, 2019. "Framing the picture of energy consumption in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(3), pages 1469-1490, December.
    19. Paoli, Leonardo & Lupton, Richard C. & Cullen, Jonathan M., 2018. "Useful energy balance for the UK: An uncertainty analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 176-188.
    20. Sousa, Tânia & Brockway, Paul E. & Cullen, Jonathan M. & Henriques, Sofia Teives & Miller, Jack & Serrenho, André Cabrera & Domingos, Tiago, 2017. "The Need for Robust, Consistent Methods in Societal Exergy Accounting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 11-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10342-:d:1183686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.