IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10317-d1183005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Evaluation of Friendliness in Streets’ Pedestrian Networks Based on Complete Streets: A Case Study in Wuhan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanyuan Ma

    (Department of Urban Planning, School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Hongzan Jiao

    (Department of Urban Planning, School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    Engineering Research Center of Human Settlements and Environment of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

In recent years, with the rapid growth in the number of cars, the safe and convenient street pedestrian traffic network in cities has been broken by motor vehicle lanes. The pedestrian traffic function of streets as an important urban public space has been lost, and the pedestrian friendliness of streets needs urgent improvement. However, the existing pedestrian-friendly street space assessment has not yet formed a set of full-factor quantitative evaluation systems, making the construction of pedestrian-friendly streets still in the conceptual stage and lacking practical significance. The complete streets design concept clarifies the goal of street pedestrian space construction and proposes the full elements of street pedestrian space design, which provides important support for the construction of the street pedestrian friendliness evaluation system. Based on the complete streets design concept, this study constructs a complete set of quantitative evaluation systems of street walkability from three aspects of street space: traffic, environment and function. Meanwhile, a street pedestrian usability evaluation method is proposed to further explore the actual demand of streets. Combined with the comprehensive evaluation matrix of street pedestrian friendliness and usability, the areas where the planning of street pedestrian space does not match with the actual space are explored. The case study in Wuhan found that the overall pedestrian friendliness was high in the area, but there was significant variability. The study area is dominated by streets in need of improvement, with medium demand–low friendliness, and both the pedestrian friendliness and usability of the streets need to be improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanyuan Ma & Hongzan Jiao, 2023. "Quantitative Evaluation of Friendliness in Streets’ Pedestrian Networks Based on Complete Streets: A Case Study in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10317-:d:1183005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Su, Shiliang & Zhou, Hao & Xu, Mengya & Ru, Hu & Wang, Wen & Weng, Min, 2019. "Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 62-76.
    2. Fu Wang & Chang Tan & Miaohan Li & Dengjun Gu & Huini Wang, 2022. "Research on Traffic Design of Urban Vital Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Jiwei Li & Qingqing Ye & Xuankai Deng & Yaolin Liu & Yanfang Liu, 2016. "Spatial-Temporal Analysis on Spring Festival Travel Rush in China Based on Multisource Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Radosław Klimek, 2019. "Towards Recognising Individual Behaviours from Pervasive Mobile Datasets in Urban Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Nancy Hui & Shoshanna Saxe & Matthew Roorda & Paul Hess & Eric J. Miller, 2018. "Measuring the completeness of complete streets," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 73-95, January.
    6. Whit Blanton, 2020. "Speck: Walkable City Rules: 101 Steps to Making Better Places," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 86(1), pages 136-137, January.
    7. Yanyan Chen & Zheng Zhang & Tianwen Liang, 2019. "Assessing Urban Travel Patterns: An Analysis of Traffic Analysis Zone-Based Mobility Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunzi Yang & Yuanyuan Ma & Hongzan Jiao, 2021. "Exploring the Correlation between Block Vitality and Block Environment Based on Multisource Big Data: Taking Wuhan City as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Seungwoo Han, 2022. "Spatial stratification and socio-spatial inequalities: the case of Seoul and Busan in South Korea," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia & Hernan A. Ortiz-Ramirez, 2021. "Understanding Green Street Design: Evidence from Three Cases in the U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Ali Soltani, 2022. "Which Fabric/Scale Is Better for Transit-Oriented Urban Design: Case Studies in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Tian Gao & Rui Song & Ling Zhu & Ling Qiu, 2019. "What Characteristics of Urban Green Spaces and Recreational Activities Do Self-Reported Stressed Individuals Like? A Case Study of Baoji, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Soteropoulos, Aggelos & Mitteregger, Mathias & Berger, Martin & Zwirchmayr, Jakob, 2020. "Automated drivability: Toward an assessment of the spatial deployment of level 4 automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 64-84.
    7. Cruz-Daraviña, Paola Andrea & Bocarejo Suescún, Juan Pablo, 2021. "Freight operations in city centers: A land use conflict in urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Pereira, Mauro F. & Vale, David S. & Santana, Paula, 2023. "Is walkability equitably distributed across socio-economic groups? – A spatial analysis for Lisbon metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    9. Xinman Wang & Rong Zhu & Baoqi Che, 2022. "Spatial Optimization of Tourist-Oriented Villages by Space Syntax Based on Population Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Deborah Paul & Sara Moridpour & Le Andrew Nguyen, 2023. "Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on the Behaviour of Pedestrians," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Zhen Yang & Weijun Gao & Xueyuan Zhao & Chibiao Hao & Xudong Xie, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Population Mobility and Its Determinants in Chinese Cities Based on Travel Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    12. Wenqian Ke & Wei Chen & Zhaoyuan Yu, 2017. "Uncovering Spatial Structures of Regional City Networks from Expressway Traffic Flow Data: A Case Study from Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Junyue Yang & Xiaomei Li & Jia Du & Canhui Cheng, 2023. "Exploring the Relationship between Urban Street Spatial Patterns and Street Vitality: A Case Study of Guiyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Shi, Yuji & Blainey, Simon & Sun, Chao & Jing, Peng, 2020. "A literature review on accessibility using bibliometric analysis techniques," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Li, Zekun & Han, Zixuan & Xin, Jing & Luo, Xin & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min, 2019. "Transit oriented development among metro station areas in Shanghai, China: Variations, typology, optimization and implications for land use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 269-282.
    16. Pizzol, Bruna & Giannotti, Mariana & Tomasiello, Diego Bogado, 2021. "Qualifying accessibility to education to investigate spatial equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Irena Ištoka Otković & Barbara Karleuša & Aleksandra Deluka-Tibljaš & Sanja Šurdonja & Mario Marušić, 2021. "Combining Traffic Microsimulation Modeling and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Sustainable Spatial-Traffic Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, June.
    18. Yang, Hu & Lv, Sirui & Guo, Bao & Dai, Jianjun & Wang, Pu, 2024. "Uncovering spatiotemporal human mobility patterns in urban agglomerations: A mobility field based approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 637(C).
    19. Mitropoulos, Lambros & Karolemeas, Christos & Tsigdinos, Stefanos & Vassi, Avgi & Bakogiannis, Efthimios, 2023. "A composite index for assessing accessibility in urban areas: A case study in Central Athens, Greece," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Ivan Blečić & Tanja Congiu & Giovanna Fancello & Giuseppe Andrea Trunfio, 2020. "Planning and Design Support Tools for Walkability: A Guide for Urban Analysts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10317-:d:1183005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.