IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14964-d1261395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Edible Insects: A Study of the Availability of Insect-Based Food in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Karolina Szulc

    (Department of Food Engineering and Process Management, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

In Poland, there has been a significant surge of interest in exploring insects as a novel food source in recent years. This increased interest is evident in various sectors of society, from researchers and food manufacturers to consumers and culinary experts. For example, research institutions have been conducting studies to assess the nutritional value and environmental impact of insect-based foods, while food companies are actively experimenting on how incorporating insect-based ingredients into their product lines affects consumer preferences. Although insect-based food products are highly valued in many parts of the world, their development has only gained attention in Poland over the last decade. Researchers and startups began conducting studies and developing insect-based food alternatives at the beginning of 2015. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the market availability of insect-based food products in Poland. Since the success of insect-based food products in the Polish market depends on the willingness of consumers to buy this type of food alternative, the results of a narrow recent literature review have been summarized in this study and point out consumer perceptions and barriers to choosing insect-based food products. The aim of this narrow literature review was to provide information on consumer perceptions and barriers to consuming insect-based food products so that producers and manufacturers in Poland can design marketing strategies. To achieve the aim of this study, the websites of several food stores were examined that sell insect-based food products in Poland and created a database. Then, to identify the perceptions and barriers towards insect-based food products, the results of a few studies conducted in Poland and other countries were summarized. Six online food stores operating in Poland that sell insect-based food products were found. In total, seventy-three products that were available on the market were analyzed. The results showed that Polish consumers have access to a large variety of insect-based food alternatives, such as whole insects, protein bars, and several types of powdered insect-based food products. However, their purchasing behavior is reluctant due to several barriers, such as food neophobia and disgust, lack of familiarity with the product, lack of information about the handling and preparation of insects, and ways to incorporate insects into the daily diets of consumers. Insect-based food producers and manufacturers in Poland should consider these results when tailoring their marketing strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolina Szulc, 2023. "Edible Insects: A Study of the Availability of Insect-Based Food in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14964-:d:1261395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14964/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14964/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corina Zugravu & Monica Tarcea & Mirela Nedelescu & Daniela Nuţă & Raquel P. F. Guiné & Ciprian Constantin, 2023. "Knowledge: A Factor for Acceptance of Insects as Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Giotis, Thomas & Drichoutis, Andreas C., 2020. "Consumer acceptance and willingness-to-pay for insect-based foods: The role of proximity of insects in the food chain," MPRA Paper 104840, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Agnieszka Orkusz & Wioletta Wolańska & Joanna Harasym & Arkadiusz Piwowar & Magdalena Kapelko, 2020. "Consumers’ Attitudes Facing Entomophagy: Polish Case Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Vilma Halonen & Ville Uusitalo & Jarkko Levänen & Jani Sillman & Lauri Leppäkoski & Anna Claudelin, 2022. "Recognizing Potential Pathways to Increasing the Consumption of Edible Insects from the Perspective of Consumer Acceptance: Case Study from Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Giovanni Sogari & Diana Bogueva & Dora Marinova, 2019. "Australian Consumers’ Response to Insects as Food," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Hsiao-Ping Chang & Chun-Chieh Ma & Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Climate Change and Consumer’s Attitude toward Insect Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Marta Ros-Baró & Violeida Sánchez-Socarrás & Maria Santos-Pagès & Anna Bach-Faig & Alicia Aguilar-Martínez, 2022. "Consumers’ Acceptability and Perception of Edible Insects as an Emerging Protein Source," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irina Zamfirache, 2023. "Entomophagy—Acceptance or Hesitancy in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Leocardia Ranga & Francesco Noci & Maria Dermiki, 2024. "Insect-Based Foods: A Preliminary Qualitative Study Exploring Factors Affecting Acceptance and New Product Development Ideas through Focus Groups," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Rafaela Flores Kuff & Thelma Lucchese-Cheung & Filipe Quevedo-Silva & Arthur Mancilla Giordani, 2023. "Building Muscles from Eating Insects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. F. Xavier Medina & Francesc Fusté-Forné & Nela Filimon, 2023. "Public Awareness of Food Products, Preferences and Practices: Old Challenges and New Insights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-3, May.
    5. Le, Anh-Tuan & Tran, Thao Phuong & Mishra, Anil V., 2023. "Climate risk and bank stability: International evidence," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 70.
    6. Raquel P. F. Guiné & Sofia G. Florença & Cristina A. Costa & Paula M. R. Correia & Manuela Ferreira & Ana P. Cardoso & Sofia Campos & Ofélia Anjos & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Marijana Matek Sarić & I, 2022. "Investigation of the Level of Knowledge in Different Countries about Edible Insects: Cluster Segmentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Ioanna Apostolidou & Foivos Anastasiadis & Anastasios Michailidis, 2018. "Consumer Perceived Value to Traceability System in Food Supply Chains: iGeneration vs Millennials," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 19(2), January.
    8. Sara Arphorn & Aniruth Manothum & Kotchakorn Santiwung & Kanograt Pangunta & Kunio Hara & Tomohiro Ishimaru, 2021. "Working Conditions and Urinalysis Dipstick Testing among Female Rice Farmers: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-10, August.
    9. I-Cheng Lu & Chen-Cheng Yang & Chi-Hsien Huang & Szu-Ying Chen & Chi-Wei Lin & Chia-Hsiang Lin & Hung-Yi Chuang, 2022. "The Risk Factors for Radiolucent Nephrolithiasis among Workers in High-Temperature Workplaces in the Steel Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-9, November.
    10. Luca Iseppi & Marcella Rizzo & Enrico Gori & Federico Nassivera & Ivana Bassi & Alessandro Scuderi, 2021. "Rasch Model for Assessing Propensity to Entomophagy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Sigrid Kusch-Brandt, 2020. "Towards More Sustainable Food Systems—14 Lessons Learned," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-8, June.
    12. Eloi Jorge & Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras & Maria Beatriz Gonzalez-Sanchez, 2020. "The Importance Given to Food Naturalness Attributes by Millennial University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Mihaela Hăbeanu & Anca Gheorghe & Teodor Mihalcea, 2023. "Silkworm Bombyx mori —Sustainability and Economic Opportunity, Particularly for Romania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, June.
    14. Daniel P. Johnson, 2022. "Population-Based Disparities in U.S. Urban Heat Exposure from 2003 to 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Arkadiusz Piwowar & Wioletta Wolańska & Agnieszka Orkusz & Magdalena Kapelko & Joanna Harasym, 2023. "Modelling the Factors Influencing Polish Consumers’ Approach towards New Food Products on the Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14964-:d:1261395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.