IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8624-d1155939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermoeconomic Analysis of Subcritical and Supercritical Isobutane Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Arbula Blecich

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Paolo Blecich

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

Abstract

This article presents a novel and comprehensive approach for the thermoeconomic evaluation of subcritical and supercritical isobutane cycles for geothermal temperatures of T geo = 100–200 °C. The isobutane cycles are optimized with respect to the maximum net power or minimum levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). Cycle optimization is also included, using a minimum superheat temperature to avoid turbine erosion, which is usually neglected in the literature. The results show that economic optimums are found in the far superheated region, while thermal optimums are obtained with dry saturated or with slightly superheated vapor at the turbine inlet (Δ T sup < 5 °C). Supercritical cycles achieve better thermal performance than subcritical cycles for T geo = 179–200 °C. Internal heat recuperation improves the cycle performance: the net power output increases and the LCOE decreases, but specific installation costs (SICs) increase due to the additional heat exchanger. For geothermal temperatures of T geo = 120 → 150 °C, the costs are LCOE = 100 → 80 USD 2022 /MWh and SIC = 7000 → 5250 USD 2022 /kW, while for geothermal temperatures of T geo = 150 → 200 °C, the estimated costs are LCOE = 80 → 70 USD 2022 /MWh and SIC = 5250 → 4600 USD 2022 /kW.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Arbula Blecich & Paolo Blecich, 2023. "Thermoeconomic Analysis of Subcritical and Supercritical Isobutane Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8624-:d:1155939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nima Javanshir & Seyed Mahmoudi S. M. & M. Akbari Kordlar & Marc A. Rosen, 2020. "Energy and Cost Analysis and Optimization of a Geothermal-Based Cogeneration Cycle Using an Ammonia-Water Solution: Thermodynamic and Thermoeconomic Viewpoints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Angelo Algieri, 2018. "Energy Exploitation of High-Temperature Geothermal Sources in Volcanic Areas—a Possible ORC Application in Phlegraean Fields (Southern Italy)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Mauro Tagliaferri & Paweł Gładysz & Pietro Ungar & Magdalena Strojny & Lorenzo Talluri & Daniele Fiaschi & Giampaolo Manfrida & Trond Andresen & Anna Sowiżdżał, 2022. "Techno-Economic Assessment of the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Geothermal Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Li, Hongyang & Rane, Sham & Yu, Zhibin & Yu, Guopeng, 2021. "An inverse mean-line design method for optimizing radial outflow two-phase turbines in geothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 463-490.
    5. Moein Shamoushaki & Pouriya H. Niknam & Lorenzo Talluri & Giampaolo Manfrida & Daniele Fiaschi, 2021. "Development of Cost Correlations for the Economic Assessment of Power Plant Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2015. "Thermo-Economic Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation Using Zeotropic Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Paci, Marco, 2014. "A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 219-232.
    8. Laveet Kumar & Md. Shouquat Hossain & Mamdouh El Haj Assad & Mansoor Urf Manoo, 2022. "Technological Advancements and Challenges of Geothermal Energy Systems: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Wang, Dongxiang & Ling, Xiang & Peng, Hao & Liu, Lin & Tao, LanLan, 2013. "Efficiency and optimal performance evaluation of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 343-352.
    10. Nima Javanshir & S. M. Seyed Mahmoudi & Marc A. Rosen, 2019. "Thermodynamic and Exergoeconomic Analyses of a Novel Combined Cycle Comprised of Vapor-Compression Refrigeration and Organic Rankine Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Brady Bokelman & Efstathios E. Michaelides & Dimitrios N. Michaelides, 2020. "A Geothermal-Solar Hybrid Power Plant with Thermal Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Gábor Györke & Axel Groniewsky & Attila R. Imre, 2019. "A Simple Method of Finding New Dry and Isentropic Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Attila R. Imre & Réka Kustán & Axel Groniewsky, 2019. "Thermodynamic Selection of the Optimal Working Fluid for Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Nenad Mustapić & Vladislav Brkić & Željko Duić & Toni Kralj, 2022. "Thermodynamic Optimization of Advanced Organic Rankine Cycle Configurations for Geothermal Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-36, September.
    15. Andreas Diga Pratama Putera & Annisa Nurul Hidayah & Alison Subiantoro, 2019. "Thermo-Economic Analysis of A Geothermal Binary Power Plant in Indonesia—A Pre-Feasibility Case Study of the Wayang Windu Site," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Mohammed Alghamdi & Ibrahim Al-Kharsan & Sana Shahab & Abdullah Albaker & Reza Alayi & Laveet Kumar & Mamdouh El Haj Assad, 2023. "Investigation of Energy and Exergy of Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Mohd Alsaleh & Xiaohui Wang, 2023. "How Does Information and Communication Technology Affect Geothermal Energy Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniarta, Sindu & Nemś, Magdalena & Kolasiński, Piotr, 2023. "A review on thermal energy storage applicable for low- and medium-temperature organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    2. Sanne Lemmens, 2016. "Cost Engineering Techniques and Their Applicability for Cost Estimation of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Juan A. White & Santiago Velasco, 2019. "Approximating the Temperature–Entropy Saturation Curve of ORC Working Fluids From the Ideal Gas Isobaric Heat Capacity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    5. Wang, Xiao-Qiong & Li, Xiao-Ping & Li, You-Rong & Wu, Chun-Mei, 2015. "Payback period estimation and parameter optimization of subcritical organic Rankine cycle system for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 734-745.
    6. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Xinxin Zhang & Yin Zhang & Min Cao & Jingfu Wang & Yuting Wu & Chongfang Ma, 2019. "Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle Using Single-Screw Expander," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Zoltán Csedő & Botond Sinóros-Szabó & Máté Zavarkó, 2020. "Seasonal Energy Storage Potential Assessment of WWTPs with Power-to-Methane Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Meroni, Andrea & Andreasen, Jesper Graa & Persico, Giacomo & Haglind, Fredrik, 2018. "Optimization of organic Rankine cycle power systems considering multistage axial turbine design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 339-354.
    10. Gábor Pörzse & Zoltán Csedő & Máté Zavarkó, 2021. "Disruption Potential Assessment of the Power-to-Methane Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Aram Mohammed Ahmed & László Kondor & Attila R. Imre, 2021. "Thermodynamic Efficiency Maximum of Simple Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. González, Johan & Llovell, Fèlix & Garrido, José Matías & Quinteros-Lama, Héctor, 2022. "A rigorous approach for characterising the limiting optimal efficiency of working fluids in organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    13. Javanshir, Nima & Syri, Sanna & Tervo, Seela & Rosin, Argo, 2023. "Operation of district heat network in electricity and balancing markets with the power-to-heat sector coupling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    14. Miao, Zheng & Zhang, Kai & Wang, Mengxiao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Thermodynamic selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 484-497.
    15. Attila R. Imre & Réka Kustán & Axel Groniewsky, 2020. "Mapping of the Temperature–Entropy Diagrams of van der Waals Fluids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Zhang, Jianan & Qin, Kan & Li, Daijin & Luo, Kai & Dang, Jianjun, 2020. "Potential of Organic Rankine Cycles for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. He, Chao & Liu, Chao & Zhou, Mengtong & Xie, Hui & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Wu, Shuangying & Li, Yourong, 2014. "A new selection principle of working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle coupling with different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 283-291.
    18. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    19. Mustafa Erguvan & David W. MacPhee, 2018. "Energy and Exergy Analyses of Tube Banks in Waste Heat Recovery Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Tieyu Gao & Changwei Liu, 2017. "Off-Design Performances of Subcritical and Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles in Geothermal Power Systems under an Optimal Control Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8624-:d:1155939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.