IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8395-d1152695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Place Attachment on Heritage Discourse in Contemporary Places: A Case Study of Jordanian Byzantine Mosaics

Author

Listed:
  • Hanan Jazaa Abukarki

    (Department of Interior Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Near East University, Nicosia 99138, Cyprus)

  • Havva Arslangazi Uzunahmet

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Near East University, Nicosia 99138, Cyprus)

  • Zeynep Onur

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Fine, International Final University, Girne 99320, Cyprus)

Abstract

This study looks at the influence of place attachment on heritage discourse in contemporary places, specifically, Byzantine mosaics in Jordan, where the Byzantine Empire left behind a rich mosaic heritage. Today, these mosaics are replicated in contemporary architectural environments. The purpose of this article is to explore the heritage discourse surrounding Byzantine mosaics in Jordanian contemporary places with a particular focus on the replication and interpretation of the mosaics in contemporary places. To do that, the relationship between the attachments to the Byzantine mosaic places, the community’s level of awareness, and the replicated heritage discourse was examined. The research was conducted using several different methods, where structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to examine the relationship between these factors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess the measurement models of the latent components and examine their construct validity and reliability. In addition, the study was conducted in Madaba Archaeological Park in the Jordanian city of Madaba, known as the “city of mosaics”, which is rich in tourism and culture, as a subject of study. The results show that the phenomena of heritage replications in contemporary places rely on the expanding interest in history, which is manifested through realizing the historical value and unique features of heritage. This attachment, knowledge, and understanding of heritage sites based on socio-cultural norms help shape the discourse of heritage replication in the contemporary built environment. These findings provide an understanding of the reasons behind the replication behavior of heritage designs in contemporary places, which can be supported in future research and used to create an appropriate contemporary sense of place. In addition to the possibility of using it as a strategy for the sustainability of heritage designs in local culture and contemporary places, not only in Jordan but also in other heritage environments, finally, some useful suggestions emerge on which future research can be based.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanan Jazaa Abukarki & Havva Arslangazi Uzunahmet & Zeynep Onur, 2023. "The Influence of Place Attachment on Heritage Discourse in Contemporary Places: A Case Study of Jordanian Byzantine Mosaics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8395-:d:1152695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernadett Csurgó & Melanie K. Smith, 2022. "Cultural Heritage, Sense of Place and Tourism: An Analysis of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Rural Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Thuy D. T. Hoang & Graham Brown & Aise Kyoung Jin Kim, 2020. "Measuring resident place attachment in a World Cultural Heritage tourism context: the case of Hoi An (Vietnam)," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(16), pages 2059-2075, August.
    3. Haipeng Zhang & Kangning Xiong & Guangyu Fei & Ao Jin & Shirong Zhang, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Conservation Intentions of Visitors to a World Heritage Site: A Case Study of Libo Karst," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Daniele Dabbene & Carla Bartolozzi & Cristina Coscia, 2022. "How to Monitor and Evaluate Quality in Adaptive Heritage Reuse Projects from a Well-Being Perspective: A Proposal for a Dashboard Model of Indicators to Support Promoters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Stephen Graham, 2000. "Constructing premium network spaces: reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 183-200, March.
    6. Ivana Blešić & Tatjana Pivac & Sanja Kovačić & Marija Cimbaljević & Tamara Lukić & Milka Bubalo Živković & Bojan Đerčan & Dajana Bjelajac, 2022. "Place Attachment, Cultural Involvement, and Residents’ Attitudes towards Tourism Development: The Case of Novi Sad, the European Capital of Culture 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Di Wu & Caiyun Shen & Enxu Wang & Yaoyao Hou & Jun Yang, 2019. "Impact of the Perceived Authenticity of Heritage Sites on Subjective Well-Being: A Study of the Mediating Role of Place Attachment and Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Sreenidhi Konduri & In-Hee Lee, 2023. "Rethinking Sense of Place Interpretations in Declining Neighborhoods: The Case of Ami-dong Tombstone Cultural Village, Busan, South Korea," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Ruggiero, 2004. "Development and innovation of technological networks in some peripheral urban areas," ERSA conference papers ersa04p515, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Kate Gasparro & Ashby Monk, 2020. "Demystifying “localness†of infrastructure assets: Crowdfunders as local intermediaries for global investors," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 878-897, August.
    3. Stephanie Farmer, 2011. "Uneven Public Transportation Development in Neoliberalizing Chicago, USA," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(5), pages 1154-1172, May.
    4. Jean-Daniel Rinaudo & Marielle Montginoul & Jean-François Desprats, 2015. "The development of private bore-wells as independent water supplies: challenges for water utilities in France and Australia," Post-Print hal-01290169, HAL.
    5. Jonathan Rutherford, 2005. "Networks in Cities, Cities in Networks: Territory and Globalisation Intertwined in Telecommunications Infrastructure Development in Europe," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2389-2406, December.
    6. Alper Bozkurt & Ferhat Şeker, 2023. "Harmonizing Heritage and Artificial Neural Networks: The Role of Sustainable Tourism in UNESCO World Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Chris Benner, 2006. "'South Africa On-call': Information Technology and Labour Market Restructuring in South African Call Centres," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 1025-1040.
    8. Maria Anna Bertolino & Federica Corrado, 2022. "Culture-Based Practices as Driver of Local Development Processes in Mountain Areas—Evidence from the Alpine Region of the Province of Cuneo (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Lufang Zhang & Yue Wang & Zhichuan Tang & Xia Liu & Moran Zhang, 2023. "A Virtual Experience System of Bamboo Weaving for Sustainable Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on VR Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Habib M Alshuwaikhat & Danjuma I Nkwenti, 2002. "Visualizing Decisionmaking: Perspectives on Collaborative and Participative Approach to Sustainable Urban Planning and Management," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 29(4), pages 513-531, August.
    11. Yuqing Geng & Hongwei Zhu & Renjun Zhu, 2022. "Coupling Coordination between Cultural Heritage Protection and Tourism Development: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Steven Henderson, 2010. "Developer Collaboration in Urban Land Development: Partnership Working in Paddington, London," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(1), pages 165-185, February.
    13. Jean-Daniel Rinaudo & Marielle Montginoul & Jean-François Desprats, 2015. "The development of private bore-well s as independent water supplies: chall enges for water utilities in France and Australia [Le développement des forages individuels vu comme des sources d'eau au," Post-Print hal-01183835, HAL.
    14. Tooran Alizadeh & Deepti Prasad, 2024. "The right to the smart city in the Global South: A research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 426-444, February.
    15. Jenny McArthur, 2018. "Comparative infrastructural modalities: Examining spatial strategies for Melbourne, Auckland and Vancouver," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(5), pages 816-836, August.
    16. Jens Alm & Alexander Paulsson & Robert Jonsson, 2021. "Capacity in municipalities: Infrastructures, maintenance debts and ways of overcoming a run-to-failure mentality," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 81-97, March.
    17. Kębłowski, Wojciech & Van Criekingen, Mathieu & Bassens, David, 2019. "Moving past the sustainable perspectives on transport: An attempt to mobilise critical urban transport studies with the right to the city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 24-34.
    18. Konrad Miciukiewicz & Frank Moulaert & Andreas Novy & Sako Musterd & Jean Hillier, 2012. "Introduction: Problematising Urban Social Cohesion: A Transdisciplinary Endeavour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1855-1872, July.
    19. COLIN McFARLANE & JONATHAN RUTHERFORD, 2008. "Political Infrastructures: Governing and Experiencing the Fabric of the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 363-374, June.
    20. Matthew Gandy, 2005. "Cyborg Urbanization: Complexity and Monstrosity in the Contemporary City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 26-49, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8395-:d:1152695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.