IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v42y2005i13p2389-2406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Networks in Cities, Cities in Networks: Territory and Globalisation Intertwined in Telecommunications Infrastructure Development in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Rutherford

    (Laboratoire Techniques Territoires Sociétés (LATTS), Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées (ENPC), 6-8 avenue Blaise Pascal, F-77455 Mame-la-Vallee cedex 2, France, jonathan.rutherford@ enpc.fr)

Abstract

There appears to be substantial convergence in the type and extent of telecommunications networks being deployed between and in major European cities to serve increasing numbers of corporate clients, thus forming one of the principal material elements in the development of a world city network. Through a broad theoretical discussion and an empirical exploration of the interurban and intraurban network development of one of the major telecommunications providers in Europe, however, it is shown how the planning, construction and expansion of these infrastructures remain crucially shaped by a variety of historical, regulatory, economic, physical and organisational constraints and compulsions which are specific to individual cities. It is argued that the mutually constitutive nature of economic and technological connectivities suggests, therefore, that the development of a world city network continues to have an important dimension of territorial fixity, reflecting the multiscalar entanglement of territory and globalisation that forms the world cities of today.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Rutherford, 2005. "Networks in Cities, Cities in Networks: Territory and Globalisation Intertwined in Telecommunications Infrastructure Development in Europe," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2389-2406, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:13:p:2389-2406
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980500379529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980500379529
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980500379529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Taylor & Michael Hoyler, 2000. "The spatial order of European cities under conditions of contemporary globalisation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 91(2), pages 176-189, May.
    2. Neil Brenner, 1999. "Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 431-451, March.
    3. John Friedmann, 1986. "The World City Hypothesis," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 69-83, January.
    4. Stephen Graham, 2000. "Constructing premium network spaces: reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 183-200, March.
    5. Jean‐Marc Offner, 2000. "‘Territorial deregulation’: local authorities at risk from technical networks," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 165-182, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenzlhuemer Roland, 2009. "London in the Global Telecommunication Network of the Nineteenth Century," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-34, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diane E. Davis & Kian Tajbakhsh, 2005. "Globalization and Cities in Comparative Perspective," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 89-91, March.
    2. Paul Waley, 2007. "Tokyo-as-World-City: Reassessing the Role of Capital and the State in Urban Restructuring," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1465-1490, July.
    3. Olga Gritsai, 2004. "Global Business Services in Moscow: Patterns of Involvement," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 2001-2024, September.
    4. Schroeter, Eckhard & Roeber, Manfred, 2004. "Governing the Capital — Comparing Institutional Reform in Berlin, London and Paris," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt9km4z5vf, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Giuseppe Mazzeo, 2012. "Impact of high speed trains on the hierarchy of European cities," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(2), pages 159-173, September.
    6. COLIN McFARLANE & JONATHAN RUTHERFORD, 2008. "Political Infrastructures: Governing and Experiencing the Fabric of the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 363-374, June.
    7. Khan Shahed & Khan Megumi & Kyung An Sang, 2019. "Response to urban challenges by global cities within developmental states: The case of Tokyo and Seoul," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 55(4), pages 369-390, December.
    8. Richard Child Hill & Kuniko Fujita, 2003. "The Nested City: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(2), pages 207-217, February.
    9. Asato Saito, 2003. "Global City Formation in a Capitalist Developmental State: Tokyo and the Waterfront Sub-centre Project," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(2), pages 283-308, February.
    10. Thomas J Sigler & Kirsten Martinus, 2017. "Extending beyond ‘world cities’ in World City Network (WCN) research: Urban positionality and economic linkages through the Australia-based corporate network," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(12), pages 2916-2937, December.
    11. Mike Hodson & Simon Marvin, 2009. "‘Urban Ecological Security’: A New Urban Paradigm?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 193-215, March.
    12. Peter J. Taylor & D.R.F. Walker, 2001. "World Cities: A First Multivariate Analysis of their Service Complexes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(1), pages 23-47, January.
    13. Hao Chen & Qiyan Wu & Jianquan Cheng & Zhifei Ma & Weixuan Song, 2015. "Scaling-up Strategy as an Appropriate Approach for Sustainable New Town Development? Lessons from Wujin, Changzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-23, May.
    14. David Bell & Jon Binnie, 2004. "Authenticating Queer Space: Citizenship, Urbanism and Governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(9), pages 1807-1820, August.
    15. Mössner Samuel & Freytag Tim, 2014. "Setting the Ground for Global City Formation: Neoliberalisation and Local Elites in Frankfurt on the Main," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 33(4), pages 81-88.
    16. Diane E. Davis, 2005. "Cities in Global Context: A Brief Intellectual History," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 92-109, March.
    17. György Csomós & Géza Tóth, 2016. "Modelling the shifting command and control function of cities through a gravity model based bidimensional regression analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(4), pages 613-615, April.
    18. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    19. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    20. Xue, Jin, 2014. "Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner's perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 130-138.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:13:p:2389-2406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.