IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v28y2010i1p165-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developer Collaboration in Urban Land Development: Partnership Working in Paddington, London

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Henderson

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, England)

Abstract

Urban development companies are described as ‘profit maximisers' and ‘risk minimisers' in their approach to development. This frequently manifests into a discrete or site-focused mindset where outcomes such as high plot-coverage ratios, inward-looking developments, and homogenous land uses are prioritised. Incremental forms of development often result which overlook the potential for higher profits through cooperation and the opportunity to redevelop urban areas more creatively on a greater scale. Although large-scale development projects have attracted critical interest during recent decades, research has tended to assess the achievements of single landowning organisations or consortiums. This downplays the tendency for development sites to be clustered and the importance of investigating the factors which encourage and/or discourage nearby developers from collaborating. Drawing on empirical research, the author focuses on the case of Paddington on the western fringe of central London. Interview material reveals how a multisite developer partnership was established, strengthened over time, and adopted various regeneration initiatives. Critical insights describe how area collaboration was shaped by the complexities facing individual development sites and contradictory local authority attitudes. Conclusions are drawn about area master planning and future urban development research.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Henderson, 2010. "Developer Collaboration in Urban Land Development: Partnership Working in Paddington, London," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(1), pages 165-185, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:28:y:2010:i:1:p:165-185
    DOI: 10.1068/c0927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c0927
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c0927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Ward, 2003. "The limits to contemporary urban redevelopment 'Doing’ entrepreneurial urbanism in Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 199-211, July.
    2. Stephen Graham, 2000. "Constructing premium network spaces: reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 183-200, March.
    3. David Adams & Norman Hutchison, 2000. "The urban task force report: Reviewing land ownership constraints to brownfield redevelopment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 777-782.
    4. Aron Gooblar, 2002. "Outside the Walls: Urban Gated Communities and their Regulation within the British Planning System," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 321-334, April.
    5. Karen Hibbitt & Peris Jones & Richard Meegan, 2001. "Tackling Social Exclusion: The Role of Social Capital in Urban Regeneration on Merseyside — From Mistrust to Trust?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 141-161, March.
    6. Simon Guy & John Henneberry & Steven Rowley, 2002. "Development Cultures and Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1181-1196, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thierry Theurillat, 2011. "La ville négociée : entre financiarisation et durabilité," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 13(3), pages 225-254.
    2. Kate Gasparro & Ashby Monk, 2020. "Demystifying “localness†of infrastructure assets: Crowdfunders as local intermediaries for global investors," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 878-897, August.
    3. Sam Wong, 2008. "Building Social Capital in Hong Kong by Institutionalising Participation: Potential and Limitations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(7), pages 1413-1437, June.
    4. Alistair Kefford, 2021. "Actually existing managerialism: Planning, politics and property development in post-1945 Britain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2441-2455, September.
    5. Stephanie Farmer, 2011. "Uneven Public Transportation Development in Neoliberalizing Chicago, USA," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(5), pages 1154-1172, May.
    6. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    7. Thierry Theurillat & Jose Corpataux & Olivier Crevoisier, 2008. "Property Sector Financialization: The Case of Swiss Pension Funds (1992--2005)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 189-212, December.
    8. Randy Lippert & Mark Sleiman, 2012. "Ambassadors, Business Improvement District Governance and Knowledge of the Urban," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 61-76, January.
    9. Brett Christophers, 2008. "The BBC, the Creative Class, and Neoliberal Urbanism in the North of England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(10), pages 2313-2329, October.
    10. Iain Deas & Stephen Hincks & Nicola Headlam, 2013. "Explicitly permissive? Understanding actor interrelationships in the governance of economic development: The experience of England’s Local Enterprise Partnerships," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(7-8), pages 718-737, November.
    11. Jean-Daniel Rinaudo & Marielle Montginoul & Jean-François Desprats, 2015. "The development of private bore-well s as independent water supplies: chall enges for water utilities in France and Australia [Le développement des forages individuels vu comme des sources d'eau au," Post-Print hal-01183835, HAL.
    12. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 337-361, March.
    13. Jenny McArthur, 2018. "Comparative infrastructural modalities: Examining spatial strategies for Melbourne, Auckland and Vancouver," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(5), pages 816-836, August.
    14. Adrienne La Grange, 2014. "Hong Kong's Gating Machine," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 251-269, March.
    15. Konrad Miciukiewicz & Frank Moulaert & Andreas Novy & Sako Musterd & Jean Hillier, 2012. "Introduction: Problematising Urban Social Cohesion: A Transdisciplinary Endeavour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1855-1872, July.
    16. COLIN McFARLANE & JONATHAN RUTHERFORD, 2008. "Political Infrastructures: Governing and Experiencing the Fabric of the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 363-374, June.
    17. Matthew Gandy, 2005. "Cyborg Urbanization: Complexity and Monstrosity in the Contemporary City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 26-49, March.
    18. Hanan Jazaa Abukarki & Havva Arslangazi Uzunahmet & Zeynep Onur, 2023. "The Influence of Place Attachment on Heritage Discourse in Contemporary Places: A Case Study of Jordanian Byzantine Mosaics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Thierry Theurillat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2013. "The Sustainability of a Financialized Urban Megaproject: The Case of Sihlcity in Zurich," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2052-2073, November.
    20. Mike Hodson & Simon Marvin, 2009. "‘Urban Ecological Security’: A New Urban Paradigm?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 193-215, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:28:y:2010:i:1:p:165-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.