IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v36y2018i5p816-836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative infrastructural modalities: Examining spatial strategies for Melbourne, Auckland and Vancouver

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny McArthur

Abstract

Infrastructure systems are critical to support sustainable and equitable urbanisation, and infrastructure is becoming more prominent within urban spatial strategies. However, the fragmented governance and delivery of spatial plans and infrastructure projects create a challenging environment to embed planning goals across the planning, delivery and operation of infrastructure systems. There is significant uncertainty around future needs and the complex ways that infrastructures influence socio-spatial relations and political-economic processes. Additionally, fragmented knowledge of infrastructure across different disciplines undermines the development of robust planning strategies. Comparative analysis of strategic spatial plans from Auckland, Melbourne and Vancouver examines how infrastructures are instrumentalised to support planning goals. Across the three cases, the analysis identified four common infrastructural modalities: rescaling socio-spatial relations through targeted intensification, intra-urban mobility upgrades and containment boundaries; re-localising socio-spatial relations to the suburban scale with ‘complete communities’; protection of ‘gateway’ precincts; and local planning provisions to support housing affordability. By examining infrastructure through a theoretical framework for suburban infrastructures, this analysis revealed how infrastructures exert agency as artefacts shaping socio-spatial relations and through the internalisation of political-economic processes. Each modality mobilised infrastructure to support goals of global competitiveness, economic growth and ‘liveability’. Findings suggest that spatial strategies should take a user-focused approach to infrastructure to meet the needs of diverse urban populations, and engage directly with the modes of infrastructure project delivery to embed planning goals across design, delivery and operations stages. Stronger institutional mandates to control land-use and provide affordable housing would improve outcomes in these city-regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny McArthur, 2018. "Comparative infrastructural modalities: Examining spatial strategies for Melbourne, Auckland and Vancouver," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(5), pages 816-836, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:36:y:2018:i:5:p:816-836
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654418767428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654418767428
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654418767428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie Cidell, 2011. "Distribution Centers among the Rooftops: The Global Logistics Network Meets the Suburban Spatial Imaginary," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 832-851, July.
    2. Manuel B. Aalbers, 2015. "The Great Moderation, the Great Excess and the global housing crisis," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 43-60, January.
    3. Fran Tonkiss, 2015. "Afterword: Economies of infrastructure," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2-3), pages 384-391, June.
    4. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    5. Ananya Roy, 2009. "The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 819-830.
    6. David Ley, 2017. "Global China and the making of Vancouver's residential property market," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 15-34, January.
    7. Arun Chandu, 2017. "The world’s first purpose-built Airport City: Melbourne Airport, Tullamarine," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 373-400, July.
    8. Rachel Aldred & James Woodcock & Anna Goodman, 2016. "Does More Cycling Mean More Diversity in Cycling?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 28-44, January.
    9. Stephen Graham, 2000. "Constructing premium network spaces: reflections on infrastructure networks and contemporary urban development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 183-200, March.
    10. COLIN McFARLANE & JONATHAN RUTHERFORD, 2008. "Political Infrastructures: Governing and Experiencing the Fabric of the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 363-374, June.
    11. Manuel B. Aalbers, 2015. "The Great Moderation, the Great Excess and the global housing crisis," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 43-60, January.
    12. David Ley, 2017. "Global China and the making of Vancouver's residential property market," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 15-34, January.
    13. Penny Harvey & Hannah Knox, 2012. "The Enchantments of Infrastructure," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 521-536.
    14. Michael Ekers & Pierre Hamel & Roger Keil, 2012. "Governing Suburbia: Modalities and Mechanisms of Suburban Governance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 405-422, December.
    15. David Wachsmuth, 2017. "Infrastructure Alliances: Supply-Chain Expansion and Multi-city Growth Coalitions," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 93(1), pages 44-65, January.
    16. Candice Gartner, 2016. "The Science and Politics of Infrastructure Research: Asserting Power, Place, and Agency in Infrastructure Knowledge," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 377-396, July.
    17. Nicole Gurran & Peter Phibbs, 2015. "Are Governments Really Interested in Fixing the Housing Problem? Policy Capture and Busy Work in Australia," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 711-729, July.
    18. Tonkiss, Fran, 2015. "Afterword: economies of infrastructure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86717, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rasmus H Birk, 2017. "Infrastructuring the social: Local community work, urban policy and marginalized residential areas in Denmark," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 767-783, April.
    2. Janet Merkel, 2019. "‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 526-547, February.
    3. Cian O’Callaghan & Pauline McGuirk, 2021. "Situating financialisation in the geographies of neoliberal housing restructuring: reflections from Ireland and Australia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 809-827, June.
    4. David Ley, 2021. "A regional growth ecology, a great wall of capital and a metropolitan housing market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 297-315, February.
    5. Christine Hentschel, 2015. "Postcolonializing Berlin and The Fabrication of The Urban," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 79-91, January.
    6. Hazel Easthope & Laura Crommelin & Sophie-May Kerr & Laurence Troy & Ryan van den Nouwelant & Gethin Davison, 2022. "Planning for Lower-Income Households in Privately Developed High-Density Neighbourhoods in Sydney, Australia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 213-228.
    7. Konowalczuk Jan, 2017. "The Problem of Reflecting the Market in the Legal Principles of Real Estate Valuation in Poland. How to Eliminate the “Legal Footprint”?," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 44-57, June.
    8. Frances Brill, 2020. "Complexity and coordination in London’s Silvertown Quays: How real estate developers (re)centred themselves in the planning process," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 362-382, March.
    9. Tom Goodfellow & Zhengli Huang, 2021. "Contingent infrastructure and the dilution of ‘Chineseness’: Reframing roads and rail in Kampala and Addis Ababa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 655-674, June.
    10. Idt, Joel & Pellegrino, Margot, 2021. "From the ostensible objectives of public policies to the reality of changes: Local orders of densification in the urban regions of Paris and Rome," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. Vinci, Sabato & Bartolacci, Francesca & Salvia, Rosanna & Salvati, Luca, 2022. "Housing markets, the great crisis, and metropolitan gradients: Insights from Greece, 2000–2014," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Ramesh, Niranjana, 2021. "Between fragments and ordering: engineering water infrastructures in a postcolonial city," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108171, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Monstadt, Jochen & Meilinger, Valentin, 2020. "Governing Suburbia through regionalized land-use planning? Experiences from the Greater Frankfurt region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Nicholas A Phelps & Cristian Silva, 2018. "Mind the gaps! A research agenda for urban interstices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1203-1222, May.
    15. Gordon MacLeod, 2011. "Urban Politics Reconsidered," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2629-2660, September.
    16. Lisha He & Mia M Bennett & Ronghao Jiang, 2022. "The uneven geography of real estate investment by Mainland Chinese state-owned and private enterprises in the U.S.: Local market conditions, migration, and ethnic networks," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 653-675, June.
    17. David Wilson, 2022. "People as infrastructure politics in global north cities: Chicago’s South Side," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 165-179, February.
    18. Marco Zitti & Luca Salvati, 2017. "Recession and value of new dwellings: Changes in the spatial structure of Greece, 2003-2015," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 7(2), pages 1313-1313.
    19. J Miguel Kanai & Seth Schindler, 2019. "Peri-urban promises of connectivity: Linking project-led polycentrism to the infrastructure scramble," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(2), pages 302-322, March.
    20. Jiang, Yanpeng & Mohabir, Nalini & Ma, Renfeng & Zhu, Pengyu, 2017. "Sorting through Neoliberal Variations of Ghost Cities in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 445-453.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:36:y:2018:i:5:p:816-836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.