IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4697-d793764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Passenger-like Container Train Running Plan Considering Empty Container Dispatch

Author

Listed:
  • Wennan Song

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

  • Di Liu

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

  • Wenyu Rong

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China)

Abstract

Railway container transportation plays an important role in the sustainable development of transportation. In order to improve the efficiency of container transportation and maximize the transportation revenue of railway enterprises, taking the passenger-like container train running plan as the research object, we established an optimization model. The model considers the transportation requirements of empty and heavy containers, aiming at the maximum revenue of railway transportation enterprises, the conservation of container flow, train stops, container reloading, and other constraints. It is a mixed-integer linear programming optimization model. First, the shortest path between nodes was solved by the Floyd algorithm as the candidate set of the train to be run, and then the particle swarm algorithm was designed to solve the model. Numerical experiments were carried out by taking a container network with 34 nodes as an example to verify the validity of the model and algorithm. The experimental results showed that when the minimum average loading rate of trains is 70%, 47 lines need to be run, which is 163 less than the candidate lines. The running cost of all trains is 31,901,200 yuan, and total revenue of the transportation enterprise is 10,930,568 yuan. Compared with the existing container transportation mode, the passenger-like container transportation mode has a higher average number of trains and faster velocity. However, it has a lower average loading rate and proportion of direct container flow. The results were compared in three different minimum average loading rate values: 50%, 60%, and 70%. It was found that with the increase of the minimum average loading rate of trains, the number of lines to be opened decreases, the cost of running decreases, and the revenue of transportation enterprises increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Wennan Song & Di Liu & Wenyu Rong, 2022. "Optimization of Passenger-like Container Train Running Plan Considering Empty Container Dispatch," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4697-:d:793764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiahao Zhao & Xiaoning Zhu & Li Wang, 2020. "Study on Scheme of Outbound Railway Container Organization in Rail-Water Intermodal Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Xueqiao Yu & Maoxiang Lang & Wenhui Zhang & Shiqi Li & Mingyue Zhang & Xiao Yu, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Comprehensive Optimization Method of a Train Diagram of the China High Speed Railway Express," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Lin, Bo-Liang & Wang, Zhi-Mei & Ji, Li-Jun & Tian, Ya-Ming & Zhou, Guo-Qing, 2012. "Optimizing the freight train connection service network of a large-scale rail system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 649-667.
    4. Huanyin Su & Wencong Tao & Xinlei Hu, 2019. "A Line Planning Approach for High-Speed Rail Networks with Time-Dependent Demand and Capacity Constraints," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-18, March.
    5. Pu, Song & Zhan, Shuguang, 2021. "Two-stage robust railway line-planning approach with passenger demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Shintani, Koichi & Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2007. "The container shipping network design problem with empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 39-59, January.
    7. Xie, Yangyang & Liang, Xiaoying & Ma, Lijun & Yan, Houmin, 2017. "Empty container management and coordination in intermodal transport," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 223-232.
    8. Hossein Khakbaz & Jyotirmoyee Bhattacharjya, 2014. "Maritime Empty Container Repositioning: A Problem Review," International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), IGI Global, vol. 5(1), pages 1-23, January.
    9. William C. Jordan & Mark A. Turnquist, 1983. "A Stochastic, Dynamic Network Model for Railroad Car Distribution," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 123-145, May.
    10. Khaled, Abdullah A. & Jin, Mingzhou & Clarke, David B. & Hoque, Mohammad A., 2015. "Train design and routing optimization for evaluating criticality of freight railroad infrastructures," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 71-84.
    11. Wang, Yihui & D’Ariano, Andrea & Yin, Jiateng & Meng, Lingyun & Tang, Tao & Ning, Bin, 2018. "Passenger demand oriented train scheduling and rolling stock circulation planning for an urban rail transit line," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 193-227.
    12. Cao, Chengxuan & Gao, Ziyou & Li, Keping, 2012. "Capacity allocation problem with random demands for the rail container carrier," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 214-221.
    13. Michal Drábek & Vít Janoš, 2021. "Construction of Differentiated Periodic Freight Train Paths in Dense Mixed Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-33, July.
    14. Martin Joborn & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michel Gendreau & Kaj Holmberg & Jan T. Lundgren, 2004. "Economies of Scale in Empty Freight Car Distribution in Scheduled Railways," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 121-134, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingyao Song & Xin Tang & Chuanxu Wang & Changyan Xu & Junyi Wei, 2022. "Optimization of Multi-Port Empty Container Repositioning under Uncertain Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alaa Abdelshafie & May Salah & Tomaž Kramberger & Dejan Dragan, 2022. "Repositioning and Optimal Re-Allocation of Empty Containers: A Review of Methods, Models, and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Chen, Chongshuang & Dollevoet, Twan & Zhao, Jun, 2018. "One-block train formation in large-scale railway networks: An exact model and a tree-based decomposition algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-30.
    3. Qiu, Xuan & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2019. "Quantity discount pricing for rail transport in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 563-580.
    4. Chen, C. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Zhao, J., 2017. "One-block train formation in large-scale railway networks: An exact model and a tree-based decomposition algorithm," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI-2017-32, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    5. Yi Zhao & Qingwan Xue & Xi Zhang, 2018. "Stochastic Empty Container Repositioning Problem with CO 2 Emission Considerations for an Intermodal Transportation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Sun, Lishan & Lu, Huabo & Xu, Yan & Kong, Dewen & Shao, Juan, 2022. "Fairness-oriented train service design for urban rail transit cross-line operation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    7. Wenliang Zhou & Mehdi Oldache, 2021. "Integrated Optimization of Line Planning, Timetabling and Rolling Stock Allocation for Urban Railway Lines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, November.
    8. Amar Kumar Narisetty & Jean-Philippe P. Richard & David Ramcharan & Deby Murphy & Gayle Minks & Jim Fuller, 2008. "An Optimization Model for Empty Freight Car Assignment at Union Pacific Railroad," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 89-102, April.
    9. Liu, Xiaoyu & Dabiri, Azita & Xun, Jing & De Schutter, Bart, 2023. "Bi-level model predictive control for metro networks: Integration of timetables, passenger flows, and train speed profiles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    10. Belgacem Bouzaiene-Ayari & Clark Cheng & Sourav Das & Ricardo Fiorillo & Warren B. Powell, 2016. "From Single Commodity to Multiattribute Models for Locomotive Optimization: A Comparison of Optimal Integer Programming and Approximate Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 366-389, May.
    11. Jeong, Yoonjea & Saha, Subrata & Chatterjee, Debajyoti & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2018. "Direct shipping service routes with an empty container management strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 123-142.
    12. Kuzmicz, Katarzyna Anna & Pesch, Erwin, 2019. "Approaches to empty container repositioning problems in the context of Eurasian intermodal transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 194-213.
    13. Sarmadi, Kamran & Amiri-Aref, Mehdi & Dong, Jing-Xin & Hicks, Christian, 2020. "Integrated strategic and operational planning of dry port container networks in a stochastic environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 132-164.
    14. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    15. Peiling Wu & Joseph C. Hartman & George R. Wilson, 2005. "An Integrated Model and Solution Approach for Fleet Sizing with Heterogeneous Assets," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 87-103, February.
    16. Wang, Dian & D’Ariano, Andrea & Zhao, Jun & Zhong, Qingwei & Peng, Qiyuan, 2022. "Integrated rolling stock deadhead routing and timetabling in urban rail transit lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 526-559.
    17. Guericke, Stefan & Tierney, Kevin, 2015. "Liner shipping cargo allocation with service levels and speed optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 40-60.
    18. Milan Janić, 2018. "Modelling the resilience of rail passenger transport networks affected by large-scale disruptive events: the case of HSR (high speed rail)," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1101-1137, July.
    19. Ghanei, Shima & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2023. "A two-stage stochastic collaborative intertwined supply network design problem under multiple disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 0. "Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4697-:d:793764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.