IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2305-d752004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESMA-OPF: Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm for Solving Optimal Power Flow Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Farhat

    (Electrical Power and Machines Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11517, Egypt)

  • Salah Kamel

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan 81542, Egypt)

  • Ahmed M. Atallah

    (Electrical Power and Machines Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11517, Egypt)

  • Mohamed H. Hassan

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan 81542, Egypt)

  • Ahmed M. Agwa

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Northern Border University, Arar 1321, Saudi Arabia
    Prince Faisal bin Khalid bin Sultan Research Chair in Renewable Energy Studies and Applications (PFCRE), Northern Border University, Arar 1321, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

In this work, an enhanced slime mould algorithm (ESMA) based on neighborhood dimension learning (NDL) search strategy is proposed for solving the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. Before using the proposed ESMA for solving the OPF problem, its validity is verified by an experiment using 23 benchmark functions and compared with the original SMA, and three other recent optimization algorithms. Consequently, the ESMA is used to solve a modified power flow model including both conventional energy, represented by thermal power generators (TPGs), and renewable energy represented by wind power generators (WPGs) and solar photovoltaic generators (SPGs). Despite the important role of WPGs and SPGs in reducing CO 2 emissions, they represent a big challenge for the OPF problem due to their intermittent output powers. To forecast the intermittent output powers from SPGs and WPGs, Lognormal and Weibull probability density functions (PDFs) are used, respectively. The objective function of the OPF has two extra costs, penalty cost and reserve cost. The penalty cost is added to formulate the underestimation of the produced power from the WPGs and SPGs, while the reserve cost is added to formulate the case of overestimation. Moreover, to decrease CO 2 emissions from TPGs, a direct carbon tax is added to the objective function in some cases. The uncertainty of load demand represents also another challenge for the OPF that must be taken into consideration while solving it. In this study, the uncertainty of load demand is represented by the normal PDF. Simulation results of ESMA for solving the OPF are compared with the results of the conventional SMA and two further optimization methods. The simulation results obtained in this research show that ESMA is more effective in finding the optimal solution of the OPF problem with regard to minimizing the total power cost and the convergence of solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Farhat & Salah Kamel & Ahmed M. Atallah & Mohamed H. Hassan & Ahmed M. Agwa, 2022. "ESMA-OPF: Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm for Solving Optimal Power Flow Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-33, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2305-:d:752004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salah K. ElSayed & Ehab E. Elattar, 2021. "Slime Mold Algorithm for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Combining with Renewable Energy Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Mohseni-Bonab, Seyed Masoud & Rabiee, Abbas & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam, 2016. "Voltage stability constrained multi-objective optimal reactive power dispatch under load and wind power uncertainties: A stochastic approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 598-609.
    3. Dubey, Hari Mohan & Pandit, Manjaree & Panigrahi, B.K., 2015. "Hybrid flower pollination algorithm with time-varying fuzzy selection mechanism for wind integrated multi-objective dynamic economic dispatch," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 188-202.
    4. Panda, Ambarish & Tripathy, M., 2015. "Security constrained optimal power flow solution of wind-thermal generation system using modified bacteria foraging algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 816-827.
    5. Adrián F. Peña-Delgado & Hernán Peraza-Vázquez & Juan H. Almazán-Covarrubias & Nicolas Torres Cruz & Pedro Martín García-Vite & Ana Beatriz Morales-Cepeda & Juan M. Ramirez-Arredondo, 2020. "A Novel Bio-Inspired Algorithm Applied to Selective Harmonic Elimination in a Three-Phase Eleven-Level Inverter," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-10, December.
    6. Shahid Hussain & Ki-Beom Lee & Mohamed A. Ahmed & Barry Hayes & Young-Chon Kim, 2020. "Two-Stage Fuzzy Logic Inference Algorithm for Maximizing the Quality of Performance under the Operational Constraints of Power Grid in Electric Vehicle Parking Lots," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-31, September.
    7. Sirote Khunkitti & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Suttichai Premrudeepreechacharn, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problems Based on Slime Mould Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alencar, Marina Valença & da Silva, Diego Nunes & Nepomuceno, Leonardo & Martins, André Christóvão Pio & Balbo, Antonio Roberto & Soler, Edilaine Martins, 2024. "Discrete optimal power flow with prohibited zones, multiple-fuel options, and practical operational rules for control devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    2. Mohammed Hamouda Ali & Ali M. El-Rifaie & Ahmed A. F. Youssef & Vladimir N. Tulsky & Mohamed A. Tolba, 2023. "Techno-Economic Strategy for the Load Dispatch and Power Flow in Power Grids Using Peafowl Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Mahmoud A. Ali & Salah Kamel & Mohamed H. Hassan & Emad M. Ahmed & Mohana Alanazi, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow Solution of Power Systems with Renewable Energy Sources Using White Sharks Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qun Niu & Ming You & Zhile Yang & Yang Zhang, 2021. "Economic Emission Dispatch Considering Renewable Energy Resources—A Multi-Objective Cross Entropy Optimization Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-33, May.
    2. Chen, Min-Rong & Zeng, Guo-Qiang & Lu, Kang-Di, 2019. "Constrained multi-objective population extremal optimization based economic-emission dispatch incorporating renewable energy resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 277-294.
    3. Nikkhah, Saman & Rabiee, Abbas, 2018. "Optimal wind power generation investment, considering voltage stability of power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 308-325.
    4. Ma, Yixiang & Yu, Lean & Zhang, Guoxing & Lu, Zhiming & Wu, Jiaqian, 2023. "Source-load uncertainty-based multi-objective multi-energy complementary optimal scheduling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    5. Mohagheghi, Erfan & Gabash, Aouss & Alramlawi, Mansour & Li, Pu, 2018. "Real-time optimal power flow with reactive power dispatch of wind stations using a reconciliation algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 509-523.
    6. Rahmani, Shima & Amjady, Nima, 2017. "A new optimal power flow approach for wind energy integrated power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 349-359.
    7. Khaled Nusair & Lina Alhmoud, 2020. "Application of Equilibrium Optimizer Algorithm for Optimal Power Flow with High Penetration of Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-35, November.
    8. Sangeeta Pant & Anuj Kumar & Mangey Ram, 2017. "Flower pollination algorithm development: a state of art review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1858-1866, November.
    9. Muhammad Riaz & Aamir Hanif & Haris Masood & Muhammad Attique Khan & Kamran Afaq & Byeong-Gwon Kang & Yunyoung Nam, 2021. "An Optimal Power Flow Solution of a System Integrated with Renewable Sources Using a Hybrid Optimizer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Muhammad, Yasir & Khan, Nusrat & Awan, Saeed Ehsan & Raja, Muhammad Asif Zahoor & Chaudhary, Naveed Ishtiaq & Kiani, Adiqa Kausar & Ullah, Farman & Shu, Chi-Min, 2022. "Fractional memetic computing paradigm for reactive power management involving wind-load chaos and uncertainties," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Yuan Liu & Qinliang Tan & Jian Han & Mingxin Guo, 2021. "Energy-Water-Carbon Nexus Optimization for the Path of Achieving Carbon Emission Peak in China Considering Multiple Uncertainties: A Case Study in Inner Mongolia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Rambabu Muppidi & Ramakrishna S. S. Nuvvula & S. M. Muyeen & SK. A. Shezan & Md. Fatin Ishraque, 2022. "Optimization of a Fuel Cost and Enrichment of Line Loadability for a Transmission System by Using Rapid Voltage Stability Index and Grey Wolf Algorithm Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Dehnavi, Ehsan & Abdi, Hamdi, 2016. "Optimal pricing in time of use demand response by integrating with dynamic economic dispatch problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1086-1094.
    14. Yuki Matsuda & Yuto Yamazaki & Hiromu Oki & Yasuhiro Takeda & Daishi Sagawa & Kenji Tanaka, 2021. "Demonstration of Blockchain Based Peer to Peer Energy Trading System with Real-Life Used PHEV and HEMS Charge Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.
    15. Hussain, Shahid & Irshad, Reyazur Rashid & Pallonetto, Fabiano & Hussain, Ihtisham & Hussain, Zakir & Tahir, Muhammad & Abimannan, Satheesh & Shukla, Saurabh & Yousif, Adil & Kim, Yun-Su & El-Sayed, H, 2023. "Hybrid coordination scheme based on fuzzy inference mechanism for residential charging of electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    16. Mohammed Al-Saadi & Sharmistha Bhattacharyya & Pierre Van Tichelen & Manuel Mathes & Johannes Käsgen & Joeri Van Mierlo & Maitane Berecibar, 2022. "Impact on the Power Grid Caused via Ultra-Fast Charging Technologies of the Electric Buses Fleet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Slim Abid & Ali M. El-Rifaie & Mostafa Elshahed & Ahmed R. Ginidi & Abdullah M. Shaheen & Ghareeb Moustafa & Mohamed A. Tolba, 2023. "Development of Slime Mold Optimizer with Application for Tuning Cascaded PD-PI Controller to Enhance Frequency Stability in Power Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-32, April.
    18. Murtadha Al-Kaabi & Virgil Dumbrava & Mircea Eremia, 2022. "A Slime Mould Algorithm Programming for Solving Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problems with Pareto Front Approach: A Case Study of the Iraqi Super Grid High Voltage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-33, October.
    19. Ahmed I. Omar & Ziad M. Ali & Mostafa Al-Gabalawy & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem & Mujahed Al-Dhaifallah, 2020. "Multi-Objective Environmental Economic Dispatch of an Electricity System Considering Integrated Natural Gas Units and Variable Renewable Energy Sources," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-37, July.
    20. Umar Waleed & Abdul Haseeb & Muhammad Mansoor Ashraf & Faisal Siddiq & Muhammad Rafiq & Muhammad Shafique, 2022. "A Multiobjective Artificial-Hummingbird-Algorithm-Based Framework for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Considering Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2305-:d:752004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.