IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7473-d939013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Slime Mould Algorithm Programming for Solving Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problems with Pareto Front Approach: A Case Study of the Iraqi Super Grid High Voltage

Author

Listed:
  • Murtadha Al-Kaabi

    (Department of Power Systems, Faculty of Energy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060029 Bucharest, Romania
    School Buildings Department, Ministry of Education, Rusafa 3, Baghdad 10059, Iraq)

  • Virgil Dumbrava

    (Department of Power Systems, Faculty of Energy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060029 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mircea Eremia

    (Department of Power Systems, Faculty of Energy, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060029 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Optimal power flow (OPF) represents one of the most important issues in the electrical power system for energy management, planning, and operation via finding optimal control variables with satisfying the equality and inequality constraints. Several optimization methods have been proposed to solve OPF problems, but there is still a need to achieve optimum performance. A Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA) is one of the new stochastic optimization methods inspired by the behaviour of the oscillation mode of slime mould in nature. The proposed algorithm is characterized as easy, simple, efficient, avoiding stagnation in the local optima and moving toward the optimal solution. Different frameworks have been applied to achieve single and conflicting multi-objective functions simultaneously (Bi, Tri, Quad, and Quinta objective functions) for solving OPF problems. These objective functions are total fuel cost of generation units, real power loss on transmission lines, total emission issued by fossil-fuelled thermal units, voltage deviation at load bus, and voltage stability index of the whole system. The proposed algorithm SMA has been developed by incorporating it with Pareto concept optimization to generate a new approach, named the Multi-Objective Slime Mould Algorithm (MOSMS), to solve multi-objective optimal power flow (MOOPF) problems. Fuzzy set theory and crowding distance are the proposed strategies to obtain the best compromise solution and rank and reduce a set of non-dominated solutions, respectively. To investigate the performance of the proposed algorithm, two standard IEEE test systems (IEEE 30 bus IEEE 57 bus systems) and a practical system (Iraqi Super Grid High Voltage 400 kV) were tested with 29 case studies based on MATLAB software. The optimal results obtained by the proposed approach (SMA) were compared with other algorithms mentioned in the literature. These results confirm the ability of SMA to provide better solutions to achieve the optimal control variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Murtadha Al-Kaabi & Virgil Dumbrava & Mircea Eremia, 2022. "A Slime Mould Algorithm Programming for Solving Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problems with Pareto Front Approach: A Case Study of the Iraqi Super Grid High Voltage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-33, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7473-:d:939013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meng, Anbo & Zeng, Cong & Wang, Peng & Chen, De & Zhou, Tianmin & Zheng, Xiaoying & Yin, Hao, 2021. "A high-performance crisscross search based grey wolf optimizer for solving optimal power flow problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Ghasemi, Mojtaba & Ghavidel, Sahand & Ghanbarian, Mohammad Mehdi & Gharibzadeh, Masihallah & Azizi Vahed, Ali, 2014. "Multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, emission, voltage deviation and power losses using multi-objective modified imperialist competitive algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 276-289.
    3. Sirote Khunkitti & Apirat Siritaratiwat & Suttichai Premrudeepreechacharn, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problems Based on Slime Mould Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Abdullah Khan & Hashim Hizam & Noor Izzri bin Abdul Wahab & Mohammad Lutfi Othman, 2020. "Optimal power flow using hybrid firefly and particle swarm optimization algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, August.
    5. David H. Wolpert & William G. Macready, 1995. "No Free Lunch Theorems for Search," Working Papers 95-02-010, Santa Fe Institute.
    6. Li, Shuijia & Gong, Wenyin & Wang, Ling & Yan, Xuesong & Hu, Chengyu, 2020. "Optimal power flow by means of improved adaptive differential evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Hashim, Fatma A. & Houssein, Essam H. & Hussain, Kashif & Mabrouk, Mai S. & Al-Atabany, Walid, 2022. "Honey Badger Algorithm: New metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 84-110.
    8. Nguyen, Thang Trung, 2019. "A high performance social spider optimization algorithm for optimal power flow solution with single objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 218-240.
    9. Warid Warid & Hashim Hizam & Norman Mariun & Noor Izzri Abdul-Wahab, 2016. "Optimal Power Flow Using the Jaya Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Mohammad Zohrul Islam & Noor Izzri Abdul Wahab & Veerapandiyan Veerasamy & Hashim Hizam & Nashiren Farzilah Mailah & Josep M. Guerrero & Mohamad Nasrun Mohd Nasir, 2020. "A Harris Hawks Optimization Based Single- and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Considering Environmental Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yingming Liu & Shuyuan Zhang & Xiaodong Wang & Hongfang Xie & Tian Cao, 2022. "Optimization of Pitch Control Parameters for a Wind Turbine Based on Tower Active Damping Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Faraj Al-Bhadely & Aslan İnan, 2023. "Improving Directional Overcurrent Relay Coordination in Distribution Networks for Optimal Operation Using Hybrid Genetic Algorithm with Sequential Quadratic Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Murtadha Al-Kaabi & Virgil Dumbrava & Mircea Eremia, 2022. "Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Based on Hunger Games Search with Pareto Concept Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-31, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murtadha Al-Kaabi & Virgil Dumbrava & Mircea Eremia, 2022. "Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Based on Hunger Games Search with Pareto Concept Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-31, November.
    2. Ragab El-Sehiemy & Abdallah Elsayed & Abdullah Shaheen & Ehab Elattar & Ahmed Ginidi, 2021. "Scheduling of Generation Stations, OLTC Substation Transformers and VAR Sources for Sustainable Power System Operation Using SNS Optimizer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Ali S. Alghamdi, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow in Wind–Photovoltaic Energy Regulation Systems Using a Modified Turbulent Water Flow-Based Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Abdullah Khan & Hashim Hizam & Noor Izzri Abdul-Wahab & Mohammad Lutfi Othman, 2020. "Solution of Optimal Power Flow Using Non-Dominated Sorting Multi Objective Based Hybrid Firefly and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Shaheen, Abdullah M. & El-Sehiemy, Ragab A. & Hasanien, Hany M. & Ginidi, Ahmed R., 2022. "An improved heap optimization algorithm for efficient energy management based optimal power flow model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Li, Shuijia & Gong, Wenyin & Hu, Chengyu & Yan, Xuesong & Wang, Ling & Gu, Qiong, 2021. "Adaptive constraint differential evolution for optimal power flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Shaheen, Abdullah M. & El-Sehiemy, Ragab A. & Alharthi, Mosleh M. & Ghoneim, Sherif S.M. & Ginidi, Ahmed R., 2021. "Multi-objective jellyfish search optimizer for efficient power system operation based on multi-dimensional OPF framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    8. Amr Khaled Khamees & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Makram R. Eskaros & Mahmoud A. Attia & Mariam A. Sameh, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow with Stochastic Renewable Energy Using Three Mixture Component Distribution Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Mohamed A. M. Shaheen & Hany M. Hasanien & Said F. Mekhamer & Mohammed H. Qais & Saad Alghuwainem & Zia Ullah & Marcos Tostado-Véliz & Rania A. Turky & Francisco Jurado & Mohamed R. Elkadeem, 2022. "Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Solution Using a Novel Hybrid Metaheuristic and Machine Learning Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Mohamed S. Hashish & Hany M. Hasanien & Haoran Ji & Abdulaziz Alkuhayli & Mohammed Alharbi & Tlenshiyeva Akmaral & Rania A. Turky & Francisco Jurado & Ahmed O. Badr, 2023. "Monte Carlo Simulation and a Clustering Technique for Solving the Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Problem for Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Li, Shuijia & Gong, Wenyin & Wang, Ling & Yan, Xuesong & Hu, Chengyu, 2020. "Optimal power flow by means of improved adaptive differential evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    12. Xiao, Hui & Cao, Minhao, 2020. "Balancing the demand and supply of a power grid system via reliability modeling and maintenance optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Sherif S. M. Ghoneim & Mohamed F. Kotb & Hany M. Hasanien & Mosleh M. Alharthi & Attia A. El-Fergany, 2021. "Cost Minimizations and Performance Enhancements of Power Systems Using Spherical Prune Differential Evolution Algorithm Including Modal Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Mahmoud A. Ali & Salah Kamel & Mohamed H. Hassan & Emad M. Ahmed & Mohana Alanazi, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow Solution of Power Systems with Renewable Energy Sources Using White Sharks Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Balasubbareddy Mallala & Venkata Prasad Papana & Ravindra Sangu & Kowstubha Palle & Venkata Krishna Reddy Chinthalacheruvu, 2022. "Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Solution Using a Non-Dominated Sorting Hybrid Fruit Fly-Based Artificial Bee Colony," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Abdullah Shaheen & Ahmed Ginidi & Ragab El-Sehiemy & Abdallah Elsayed & Ehab Elattar & Hassen T. Dorrah, 2022. "Developed Gorilla Troops Technique for Optimal Power Flow Problem in Electrical Power Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-29, May.
    17. Zhouxin Lan & Qing He & Hongzan Jiao & Liu Yang, 2022. "An Improved Equilibrium Optimizer for Solving Optimal Power Flow Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, April.
    18. Hao Su & Qun Niu & Zhile Yang, 2023. "Optimal Power Flow Using Improved Cross-Entropy Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-33, July.
    19. Meng, Anbo & Zeng, Cong & Wang, Peng & Chen, De & Zhou, Tianmin & Zheng, Xiaoying & Yin, Hao, 2021. "A high-performance crisscross search based grey wolf optimizer for solving optimal power flow problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    20. Mohamed A. M. Shaheen & Hany M. Hasanien & Rania A. Turky & Martin Ćalasan & Ahmed F. Zobaa & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem, 2021. "OPF of Modern Power Systems Comprising Renewable Energy Sources Using Improved CHGS Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7473-:d:939013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.