IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1761-d741642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Drives the Structural Anchoring of ESD? Network Theory-Based Considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Anna-Luise Schönheit

    (Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Ronald Gebauer

    (Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Dieter Rink

    (Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany)

Abstract

The structural anchoring of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) can be considered as a process of collective action. From a network theory perspective, the question arises as to which network structures promote the implementation of ESD in municipalities. Although network analysis has gained some attention in the research on ESD at a transregional level, it still lacks a theoretically grounded study at the municipal level. Against the background of corresponding theoretical and empirical contributions, we therefore present a derivation of relevant hypotheses. More specifically, argue that ESD is more likely to be implemented in municipal networks that feature medium density and intersectoral as well as intermunicipal bridges. Additionally, we assume that highly centralized municipal networks promote the structural anchoring of ESD in the initial phase, with decentralized structures being more conducive the more advanced the implementation. In other words, municipal structures which allow actors from various fields of action and municipalities to communicate with each other and exchange their specific ideas and experiences on a regular basis should foster ESD implementation. Furthermore, focal actors or fields of action may be advantageous for initiating ESD implementation in a municipality, but should lose significance as adaptation processes increase over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna-Luise Schönheit & Ronald Gebauer & Dieter Rink, 2022. "What Drives the Structural Anchoring of ESD? Network Theory-Based Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1761-:d:741642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1761/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1761/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David A. Siegel, 2009. "Social Networks and Collective Action," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 122-138, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ronald Gebauer & Anna-Luise Schönheit & Dieter Rink, 2023. "Education for Sustainable Development in Germany: Governance and Inter-Organizational Perspectives—A Discussion on Qualitative Research Regarding the Municipal Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmadreza Asgharpourmasouleh & Atiye Sadeghi & Ali Yousofi, 2017. "A Grounded Agent-Based Model of Common Good Production in a Residential Complex: Applying Artificial Experiments," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(4), pages 21582440177, October.
    2. Naim Kapucu & Sean Beaudet, 2020. "Network Governance for Collective Action in Implementing United Nations Sustainable Development Goals," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Thomas Bossuroy, 2011. "Ethnic Solidarity and the Individual Determinants of Ethnic Identification," SALDRU Working Papers 69, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    4. Hai-hua Hu & Jun Lin & Wen-tian Cui, 2015. "Intervention Strategies and the Diffusion of Collective Behavior," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16.
    5. James E. Alt & Amalie Jensen & Horacio Larreguy & David D. Lassen & John Marshall, 2022. "Diffusing Political Concerns: How Unemployment Information Passed between Social Ties Influences Danish Voters," Post-Print hal-03566206, HAL.
    6. Lei Cheng & Lei Shi & Yuxi Xie & Weihua Zeng, 2020. "Restructuring China’s Water Environment Management System: A Social Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Romain Ferrali & Guy Grossman & Melina Platas & Jonathan Rodden, 2022. "Who Registers? Village Networks, Household Dynamics, and Voter Registration in Rural Uganda," Post-Print hal-03994137, HAL.
    8. Shadmehr, Mehdi & Bernhardt, Dan, 2019. "Vanguards in revolution," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 146-166.
    9. Hirofumi Takesue, 2020. "From defection to ingroup favoritism to cooperation: simulation analysis of the social dilemma in dynamic networks," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 189-207, April.
    10. Yuan Hsiao, 2022. "Network diffusion of competing behaviors," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 47-68, May.
    11. Harris Hyun-soo Kim, 2017. "In-Group and Out-Group Networks, Informal Social Activities, and Electoral Participation Among Immigrants in South Korea," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1123-1148, November.
    12. Thomas, Daniel Robert, 2024. "The effects of exposure to violence on social network composition and formation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Farrell, Henry & Quiggin, John, 2011. "Concensus, Dissensus and Economic Ideas: The Rise and Fall of Keynesianism During the Economic Crisis," Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers 151527, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    14. Romain Ferrali & Guy Grossman & Horacio Larreguy, 2023. "Can low-cost, scalable, online interventions increase youth informed political participation in electoral authoritarian contexts?," Post-Print hal-04185976, HAL.
    15. Michael D Makowsky & Jared Rubin, 2013. "An Agent-Based Model of Centralized Institutions, Social Network Technology, and Revolution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-10, November.
    16. Hubert Janos Kiss & Ismael Rodríguez-Lara & Alfonso Rosa-García, 2017. "Overthrowing the dictator: a game-theoretic approach to revolutions and media," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(2), pages 329-355, August.
    17. Balán, Pablo & Dodyk, Juan & Puente, Ignacio, 2023. "Kin in the game: How family ties help firms overcome campaign finance regulation," Working Papers 330, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    18. Rubin, Jared, 2014. "Centralized institutions and cascades," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 340-357.
    19. Jalili, Mahdi, 2013. "Social power and opinion formation in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(4), pages 959-966.
    20. Keuschnigg, Marc, 2015. "Product Success in Cultural Markets: The Mediating Role of Familiarity, Peers, and Experts," MPRA Paper 63444, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1761-:d:741642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.