IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16791-d1003465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Sustainable Social Practices in Food Services

Author

Listed:
  • Giovana Vitória Nunes Leite Duarte

    (Undergraduate Course in Nutrition, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, Brazil)

  • Susana Pereira Antunes Procópio

    (Undergraduate Course in Nutrition, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, Brazil)

  • Angélica Cotta Lobo Leite Carneiro

    (Department of Nutrition, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 36036-900, Brazil)

  • Leandro de Morais Cardoso

    (Department of Nutrition, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 36036-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Background: Food services have a high potential to promote the social dimension of sustainability. However, there are no specific instruments for implementing and evaluating socially sustainable practices in these establishments. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate the content of a list to assess sustainable social practices in food services. Methods: The pre-list of items was developed based on scientific articles about social sustainability published in the last 20 years and Brazilian legislations related to the theme. The content validity was assessed by ten nutritionists, in two phases, using the Delphi technique. The content validity index, Kappa statistic, and content validity ratio were calculated. Results: The list that was developed consisted of 130 items, which were organized into five axes: “organizational and managerial environment” (13 items), “community” (10 items), “employees” (62 items), “consumer” (33 items), and “suppliers” (12 items). Most items in the instrument (54.7%) were optional for the food services, and 45.3% were Brazilian legal obligations. After the second phase, sub-axes axes, axes, and the global instruments showed “excellent” content validity with an item content validity index ≥ of 0.8 (at minimum, 0.920) and Kappa > 0.74 (from 0.927 to 1). The content validity ratios of the items, sub-axes, and axes vary between 0 and 0.070. The instrument was considered easy to complete and useful for evaluating socially sustainable practices adopted in food services by 95.5% of the specialists. Conclusions: The instrument that was developed had its content validated and thus can help the managers and technicians responsible for the unit with social sustainability measures, thus ensuring the socially sustainable production of meals.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovana Vitória Nunes Leite Duarte & Susana Pereira Antunes Procópio & Angélica Cotta Lobo Leite Carneiro & Leandro de Morais Cardoso, 2022. "Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Sustainable Social Practices in Food Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16791-:d:1003465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16791/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16791/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paillé, Pascal & Raineri, Nicolas, 2015. "Linking perceived corporate environmental policies and employees eco-initiatives: The influence of perceived organizational support and psychological contract breach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2404-2411.
    2. Parsa, H.G. & Lord, Kenneth R. & Putrevu, Sanjay & Kreeger, Jeff, 2015. "Corporate social and environmental responsibility in services: Will consumers pay for it?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 250-260.
    3. Pascal Paillé & Nicolas Raineri, 2015. "Linking perceived corporate environmental policies and employees eco-initiatives: The influence of perceived organizational support and psychological contract breach," Post-Print hal-03795959, HAL.
    4. Tina D. Beuchelt & Rafaël Schneider & Liliana Gamba, 2022. "Integrating the right to food in sustainability standards: A theory of change to move global supply chains from responsibilities to impacts," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1864-1889, December.
    5. Dayanne da Costa Maynard & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Eduardo Yoshio Nakano & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2020. "Sustainability Indicators in Restaurants: The Development of a Checklist," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    6. United Nations, 2016. "The Sustainable Development Goals 2016," Working Papers id:11456, eSocialSciences.
    7. Dayanne da Costa Maynard & Mayara Daré Vidigal & Priscila Farage & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Eduardo Yoshio Nakano & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2020. "Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability Indicators Applied to Food Services: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Xia, Tangbin & Dong, Yifan & Xiao, Lei & Du, Shichang & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2018. "Recent advances in prognostics and health management for advanced manufacturing paradigms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 255-268.
    9. Efrat Eizenberg & Yosef Jabareen, 2017. "Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Robert H. W. Boyer & Nicole D. Peterson & Poonam Arora & Kevin Caldwell, 2016. "Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Edward Majewski & Adam Wąs & Svein Ole Borgen & Peter Csillag & Michele Donati & Richard Freeman & Viet Hoàng & Jean-Loup Lecoeur & Maria Cecilia Mancini & An Nguyen & Monia , 2019. "Measuring the Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability of Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Anna DeCastellarnau, 2018. "A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: a literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1523-1559, July.
    13. Sheng-Fang Chou & Jeou-Shyan Horng & Chih-Hsing Liu & Yung-Chuan Huang & Yu-Chun Chung, 2016. "Expert Concepts of Sustainable Service Innovation in Restaurants in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Climate-Friendly Food in European Countries," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276930, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    15. Paula Benevene & Ilaria Buonomo, 2020. "Green Human Resource Management: An Evidence-Based Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Piotr Sulewski, 2019. "Between the Social and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability in Rural Areas—In Search of Farmers’ Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Pablo Bris & Félix Bendito, 2017. "Lessons Learned from the Failed Spanish Refugee System: For the Recovery of Sustainable Public Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, August.
    3. R. Rajesh, 2023. "Grey Markov Models for Predicting the Social Sustainability Performances of Firms," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 297-351, August.
    4. Lucas Amaral Lauriano & Juliane Reinecke & Michael Etter, 2022. "When Aspirational Talk Backfires: The Role of Moral Judgements in Employees’ Hypocrisy Interpretation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 827-845, December.
    5. Olexandr Yemelyanov & Tetyana Petrushka & Lilia Lesyk & Anatolii Havryliak & Nataliya Yanevych & Oksana Kurylo & Volodymyr Bodakovskyy & Iryna Skoropad & Taras Danylovych & Kateryna Petrushka, 2023. "Assessing the Sustainability of the Consumption of Agricultural Products with Regard to a Possible Reduction in Its Imports: The Case of Countries That Import Corn and Wheat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-29, June.
    6. Letizia Lo Presti & Giulio Maggiore & Vittoria Marino & Riccardo Resciniti, 2024. "Inclusion and social justice in sustainable higher education: An integrated perspective through the lens of public engagement," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(3), pages 771-809, September.
    7. Lucia Corsini & James Moultrie, 2019. "Design for Social Sustainability: Using Digital Fabrication in the Humanitarian and Development Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Tatjana Kosić & Slavica Stamatović Vučković & Kosara Kujundžić, 2023. "A Platform of Critical Barriers to Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, May.
    9. Fadillah Ismail, 2024. "Exploring the Impact of Employee Green Behaviour, and Green HRM on Environmental Performance? The Significance of Green Innovation and Moral Credit ," GATR Journals gjbssr647, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    10. Lili-Ann Wolff & Peter Ehrström, 2020. "Social Sustainability and Transformation in Higher Educational Settings: A Utopia or Possibility?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Syed Muhammad Fazal‐e‐Hasan & Hormoz Ahmadi & Harjit Sekhon & Gary Mortimer & Mohd Sadiq & Husni Kharouf & Muhammad Abid, 2023. "The role of green innovation and hope in employee retention," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 220-239, January.
    12. Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Amany E. Salem, 2023. "Promoting Sustainable Food Practices in Food Service Industry: An Empirical Investigation on Saudi Arabian Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Sanjay Kumar Singh & Shlomo Y. Tarba & Geoffrey Wood & Nikos Bozionelos & Manlio del Giudice & Vijay Pereira & Hengky Latan, 2022. "Adjustment and work outcomes of self-initiated expatriates in the United Arab Emirates," Post-Print hal-04325598, HAL.
    14. Chayada Kanokphanvanich & Wanchai Rattanawong & Varin Vongmanee, 2023. "A New Model for a Sustainable Healthcare Supply Chain Prioritizes Patient Safety: Using the Fuzzy Delphi Method to Identify Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Juha Hämäläinen & Pasi Matikainen, 2018. "Mechanisms and Pedagogical Counterforces of Young People’s Social Exclusion: Some Remarks on the Requisites of Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, June.
    16. Abu Yousuf Swapan & Joo Hwa Bay & Dora Marinova, 2018. "Built Form and Community Building in Residential Neighbourhoods: A Case Study of Physical Distance in Subiaco, Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Anh M. Ly & Michael R. Cope, 2023. "New Conceptual Model of Social Sustainability: Review from Past Concepts and Ideas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Francesca Loia & Paola Adinolfi, 2021. "Teleworking as an Eco-Innovation for Sustainable Development: Assessing Collective Perceptions during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Codruța Adina Băltescu & Nicoleta Andreea Neacșu & Anca Madar & Dana Boșcor & Alexandra Zamfirache, 2022. "Sustainable Development Practices of Restaurants in Romania and Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Yogesh Bhatt & Karminder Ghuman, 2023. "Corporate environmental responsiveness: a bibliometric and content analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1303-1350, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16791-:d:1003465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.