IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16435-d997499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s Policy Environment’s Development and Path from the Perspective of Policy Sustainability: A Visual Analysis Based on CNKI and WOS

Author

Listed:
  • Junjie Li

    (School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
    Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Wenbo Ma

    (Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
    School of Education and Cultural Information Development, Woosuk University, Wanju 55338, Republic of Korea)

  • Xin Dai

    (Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
    Institute of Marxism, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 300712, China)

  • Meng Qi

    (School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
    Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Bangfan Liu

    (School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
    Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

Abstract

In this paper, we examine China’s policy environment from the perspective of policy sustainability. Through our use of the CiteSpace and NVivo software, the literature on the policy environment is visualized using a knowledge graph analysis and a content analysis of highly cited papers. The analysis shows that: the number of published papers on “policy environment” is on the rise, and the research prospect is broad. There is a lack of communication and cooperation between domestic authors and a close relationship between international authors. The main research countries included the USA, Switzerland, Finland, Ireland, and Austria, etc. Domestic research focuses on vehicles for high-quality economic and social development, while international research focuses on theoretical model discussion. The domestic optimization path focuses on the transformation from “Sending blood” (“ShuXieShi”) to “Making blood” (“ZaoXieShi”), while the international research focuses on the main line of “public health and environmental protection”. Domestic research focuses on fostering a sound business environment, while international research focuses on the public, political and professional aspects of health and medical policy environment. On the whole, in the future, we should improve the adaptability of the policy environment, optimize the policy implementation environment, and establish the interaction mechanism of policy environment optimization to achieve policy optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Junjie Li & Wenbo Ma & Xin Dai & Meng Qi & Bangfan Liu, 2022. "China’s Policy Environment’s Development and Path from the Perspective of Policy Sustainability: A Visual Analysis Based on CNKI and WOS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-35, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16435-:d:997499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16435/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16435/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krista B. Isaacs & Sieglinde S. Snapp & Kimberly Chung & Kurt B. Waldman, 2016. "Assessing the value of diverse cropping systems under a new agricultural policy environment in Rwanda," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(3), pages 491-506, June.
    2. Junjie Li & Xuehang Sun & Xin Dai & Junying Zhang & Bangfan Liu, 2022. "Policy Analysis on Recycling of Solid Waste Resources in China—Content Analysis Method of CNKI Literature Based on NVivo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Xuan, Z. & Blanchette, J. & Nelson, T.F. & Heeren, T. & Oussayef, N., 2015. "The alcohol policy environment and policy subgroups as predictors of binge drinking measures among US adults," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(4), pages 816-822.
    4. Yuqing Geng & Mukasar Maimaituerxun, 2022. "Research Progress of Green Marketing in Sustainable Consumption based on CiteSpace Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junjie Li & Bei Zhang & Xin Dai & Meng Qi & Bangfan Liu, 2022. "Knowledge Ecology and Policy Governance of Green Finance in China—Evidence from 2469 Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. Abidin Kemeç & Ayşenur Tarakcıoglu Altınay, 2023. "Sustainable Energy Research Trend: A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer, RStudio Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace Software Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Meng Qi & Xin Dai & Bei Zhang & Junjie Li & Bangfan Liu, 2023. "The Evolution and Future Prospects of China’s Wave Energy Policy from the Perspective of Renewable Energy: Facing Problems, Governance Optimization and Effectiveness Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiqi Dong & Zuoji Dong, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Game Theory on Energy and Natural Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Caviedes, Julián & Ibarra, José Tomás & Calvet-Mir, Laura & Álvarez-Fernández, Santiago & Junqueira, André Braga, 2024. "Indigenous and local knowledge on social-ecological changes is positively associated with livelihood resilience in a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Del Prete, Davide & Ghins, Léopold & Magrini, Emiliano & Pauw, Karl, 2019. "Land consolidation, specialization and household diets: Evidence from Rwanda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 139-149.
    4. Geng, Yuqing & Liu, Liwen & Chen, Lingyan, 2023. "Rural revitalization of China: A new framework, measurement and forecast," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Wei Wang & Dechao Ma & Fengzhi Wu & Mengxin Sun & Shuangqing Xu & Qiuyue Hua & Ziyuan Sun, 2023. "Exploring the Knowledge Structure and Hotspot Evolution of Greenwashing: A Visual Analysis Based on Bibliometrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-35, January.
    6. Lorena Lombardozzi, 2024. "Untangling the nexus between marketization, crop diversity, farmers' wealth and nutrition: The case of Uzbekistan," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1489-1506, March.
    7. Sung Kyu Kim & Fiona Marshall & Neil M. Dawson, 2022. "Revisiting Rwanda’s agricultural intensification policy: benefits of embracing farmer heterogeneity and crop-livestock integration strategies," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 637-656, June.
    8. Xiyun Gong & Choy Leong Yee & Shin Yiing Lee & Ethan Yi Cao & Abu Naser Mohammad Saif, 2024. "Knowledge mapping of impulsive buying behavior research: a visual analysis using CiteSpace," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Kurt B. Waldman & David L. Ortega & Robert B. Richardson & Daniel C. Clay & Sieglinde Snapp, 2016. "Preferences for legume attributes in maize-legume cropping systems in Malawi," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(6), pages 1087-1099, December.
    10. Gupte, Jaideep & Longhurst, Richard, 2019. "How do the state’s organisational capacities at the micro- and macro-levels influence agriculture-nutrition linkages in fragile contexts?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-83.
    11. Waldman, Kurt B. & Ortega, David L. & Richardson, Robert B. & Snapp, Sieglinde S., 2017. "Estimating demand for perennial pigeon pea in Malawi using choice experiments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 222-230.
    12. Henry Kankwamba & Mariam Kadzamira & Karl Pauw, 2018. "How diversified is cropping in Malawi? Patterns, determinants and policy implications," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(2), pages 323-338, April.
    13. Palomo-Campesino, Sara & García-Llorente, Marina & Hevia, Violeta & Boeraeve, Fanny & Dendoncker, Nicolas & González, José A., 2022. "Do agroecological practices enhance the supply of ecosystem services? A comparison between agroecological and conventional horticultural farms," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Thi Cam Tu Dinh & Mengqi Wang & Yoonjae Lee, 2023. "How Does the Fear of Missing Out Moderate the Effect of Social Media Influencers on Their Followers’ Purchase Intention?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    15. Zhigang Li & Yi Liu, 2023. "Analysis of the Current Situation of the Research on the Influencing Factors of Online Learning Behavior and Suggestions for Teaching Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Enock Warinda & Dickson M Nyariki & Stephen Wambua & Reuben M Muasya & Munir A Hanjra, 2020. "Sustainable development in East Africa: impact evaluation of regional agricultural development projects in Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(1), pages 3-39, February.
    17. Asiama, Kwabena Obeng & Voss, Winrich & Bennett, Rohan & Rubanje, Innocent, 2021. "Land consolidation activities in Sub-Saharan Africa towards the agenda 2030: A tale of three countries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Shuai Fan & Jianfeng Jiang & Fei Li & Guoqiang Zeng & Yi Gu & Wentai Guo, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Postgraduate Teaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Mikhail Miklyaev & Glenn Jenkins & David Shobowale, 2020. "Sustainability of Agricultural Crop Policies in Rwanda: An Integrated Cost–Benefit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Junjie Li & Guohui Zhan & Xin Dai & Meng Qi & Bangfan Liu, 2022. "Innovation and Optimization Logic of Grassroots Digital Governance in China under Digital Empowerment and Digital Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16435-:d:997499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.