Author
Listed:
- Junjie Li
(School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)
- Bei Zhang
(Institute of Marxism, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)
- Xin Dai
(Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
Institute of Marxism, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 300712, China)
- Meng Qi
(School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)
- Bangfan Liu
(School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
Hebei Public Policy Evaluation and Research Center, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)
Abstract
CiteSpace was used to visualize the knowledge ecology of the green finance research literature in CNKI and WOS, and NVivo software was used to root the code analysis of the current green finance policies in China. From the analysis of the research hotspots, both in China and internationally, great importance is attached to the research on green finance, and the research on green financialization has broad prospects. The core group of authors on green finance research in China has taken shape, whereas the core group of authors of green finance research in the rest of the world has not yet taken shape. There is a lack of close cooperation and a relatively low level of communication among important domestic green finance research institutions, and a certain scale of cooperation network has been formed among influential international institutions. The major countries for influential international green finance research are Singapore, France, Switzerland, Canada and Saudi Arabia, and the international influence of China’s green finance needs to be improved. Both domestic and foreign countries attach great importance to the balance between economic growth and the low-carbon green transition. China attaches more importance to macroeconomic development and strategic transition, but internationally, the trend is toward microcorporate green performance, policy optimization and market innovation. The research focus of green finance has achieved in three stages of evolution, namely, green industry in the early stage, green services in the middle stage and green strategy in the near future. International green finance research focuses on climate change, market players, government performance, social responsibility sharing, etc. In particular, reducing the cost of green development is the focus of international green finance. The domestic focus is on climate risk, carbon neutrality, carbon peak, low-carbon transition, carbon reduction, and green transition themes. Internationally, the focus is on financial performance, decisions, green finance, credit, drivers, quality, socially responsible investment and other topics. Considering the practical implementation of green finance in China, the governance logic of China’s green finance policy consists of five main categories: policy belief, policy objective, policy tool, policy feedback and policy cycle. In the future, the development and improvement of China’s green finance policy should achieve breakthroughs in the following aspects: first, guiding the main body of green finance policy to firmly establish policy beliefs; second, improving the clarity of green finance policy objectives; third, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the governance of green financial policy instruments; fourth, strengthening the green finance incentive policy feedback system construction; and fifth, improving the quality of green finance policy cycles.
Suggested Citation
Junjie Li & Bei Zhang & Xin Dai & Meng Qi & Bangfan Liu, 2022.
"Knowledge Ecology and Policy Governance of Green Finance in China—Evidence from 2469 Studies,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-35, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:202-:d:1012633
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Abidin Kemeç & Ayşenur Tarakcıoglu Altınay, 2023.
"Sustainable Energy Research Trend: A Bibliometric Analysis Using VOSviewer, RStudio Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace Software Tools,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
- Meng Qi & Xin Dai & Bei Zhang & Junjie Li & Bangfan Liu, 2023.
"The Evolution and Future Prospects of China’s Wave Energy Policy from the Perspective of Renewable Energy: Facing Problems, Governance Optimization and Effectiveness Logic,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:202-:d:1012633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.