IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15808-d986338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Dimensions in Ex-Post Evaluation of Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Namayombo Sukasuka

    (Centre of Applied Research and Innovation in the Built Environment (CARINBE), Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa)

  • Innocent Musonda

    (Centre of Applied Research and Innovation in the Built Environment (CARINBE), Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa)

  • Molusiwa Stephan Ramabodu

    (Department of Construction Management and Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa)

  • Sambo Lyson Zulu

    (School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK)

Abstract

Although public private partnerships (PPPs) have been in existence for decades as a procurement tool for infrastructure projects, a dearth of studies on ex-post evaluation of Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects (PPPIPs) exists globally. Additionally, the contribution of scholars to the inclusion of social dimensions in ex-post evaluations is not fully known. Due to the existing gap, this study aimed at identifying and mapping the literature on the ex-post evaluation of PPPIPs and reviewed its contribution to the assessment of social impacts through the inclusion of social dimensions. The Arkesy and O’Malley five-stage framework was used to conduct a scoping review grounded in 27 articles focusing on the ex-post evaluation of PPPIPs. The selection of articles for review used the PRISMA framework and data were analysed through content analysis. The key findings revealed that mutual relationships existed among the theoretical foundation of the review, the themes, and identified social dimensions. Additionally, diversity was seen in the needs and interests of stakeholders, and finally, the low research output in the ex-post evaluation of PPPIPs was observed. A huge research potential has been revealed with specific focus on the social dimension of the triple bottom line concept of sustainable development to achieve PPPIPs’ social sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Namayombo Sukasuka & Innocent Musonda & Molusiwa Stephan Ramabodu & Sambo Lyson Zulu, 2022. "Social Dimensions in Ex-Post Evaluation of Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15808-:d:986338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junxiao Liu & Peter E.D. Love & Jim Smith & Michael Regan & Monty Sutrisna, 2014. "Public-Private Partnerships: a review of theory and practice of performance measurement," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 63(4), pages 499-512, April.
    2. Joanna Węgrzyn & Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska, 2022. "Stakeholder Analysis and Their Attitude towards PPP Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Rouhani, Omid M. & Geddes, R. Richard & Gao, H. Oliver & Bel, Germà, 2016. "Social welfare analysis of investment public–private partnership approaches for transportation projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 86-103.
    4. Xuhui Cong & Li Ma, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of Public-Private Partnership Projects from the Perspective of Efficiency, Economic, Effectiveness, and Equity: A Study of Residential Renovation Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Xia Shu & Stewart Smyth & Jim Haslam, 2021. "Post-decision project evaluation of UK public–private partnerships: insights from planning practice," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 477-486, August.
    6. Christopher D. Higgins & Ahmed Shafiqul Huque, 2015. "Public Money and Mickey Mouse: Evaluating performance and accountability in the Hong Kong Disneyland joint venture public-private partnership," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(8), pages 1103-1123, September.
    7. Yanhong Liang & Hongdi Wang, 2019. "Sustainable Performance Measurements for Public–Private Partnership Projects: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Chen, Zhenhua & Daito, Nobuhiko & Gifford, Jonathan L., 2017. "Socioeconomic impacts of transportation public-private partnerships: A dynamic CGE assessment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 80-87.
    9. Zhenhua Luo & Yufan Yang & Haize Pan & Mengfan Zhong, 2018. "Research on Performance Evaluation System of Shale Gas PPP Project Based on Matter Element Analysis," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ka Po Wong & Pei-Lee Teh & Alan Hoi Shou Chan, 2023. "Seeing the Forest and the Trees: A Scoping Review of Empirical Research on Work-Life Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kangsoo Kim & Jinoh Kim & Donghyung Yook, 2021. "Analysis of Features Affecting Contracted Rate of Return of Korean PPP Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. de Almeida, Liliane & Augusto de Jesus Pacheco, Diego & Caten, Carla Schwengber ten & Jung, Carlos Fernando, 2021. "A methodology for identifying results and impacts in technological innovation projects," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Xueguo Xu & Tingting Xu & Meizeng Gui, 2020. "Incentive Mechanism for Municipal Solid Waste Disposal PPP Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Rouhani, Omid, 2021. "Transportation Project Evaluation Methods/Approaches- Version 2," MPRA Paper 105729, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Henry J Liu & Peter ED Love & Jim Smith & Michael CP Sing & Jane Matthews, 2018. "Evaluation of public–private partnerships: A life-cycle Performance Prism for ensuring value for money," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(6), pages 1133-1153, September.
    6. Qi Rong & Liangfeng Shen, 2022. "Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Paolo Esposito & Spiridione Lucio Dicorato, 2020. "Sustainable Development, Governance and Performance Measurement in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Methodological Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Jacob, Jagan, 2020. "Should competing firms cooperate to reduce congestion?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Juan Du & Wenxin Wang & Xinghua Gao & Min Hu & Haili Jiang, 2023. "Sustainable Operations: A Systematic Operational Performance Evaluation Framework for Public–Private Partnership Transportation Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Beheshtian, Arash & Richard Geddes, R. & Rouhani, Omid M. & Kockelman, Kara M. & Ockenfels, Axel & Cramton, Peter & Do, Wooseok, 2020. "Bringing the efficiency of electricity market mechanisms to multimodal mobility across congested transportation systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 58-69.
    11. Fatima Anam & Mubin Sajjad & Masood Rehan, 2024. "Risk-based integrated performance assessment framework for public-private partnership infrastructure projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 251-274.
    12. Xiaodan Zheng & Jingfeng Yuan & Jiyue Guo & Mirosław J. Skibniewski & Sujun Zhao, 2018. "Influence of Relational Norms on User Interests in PPP Projects: Mediating Effect of Project Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Shahin Shakibaei & Pelin Alpkokin, 2019. "Conflict Resolution in Competitive Liberalized Railway Market: Application of Game Theoretic Concepts," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(01), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Hsieh, Hsu-Sheng, 2022. "Road pricing acceptability and persuasive communication effectiveness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 179-191.
    15. Zhao, Jianfeng & Liu, Henry J. & Love, Peter E.D. & Greenwood, David J. & Sing, Michael C.P., 2022. "Public-private partnerships: A dynamic discrete choice model for road projects," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    16. repec:scn:ecprob:y:2018:i:4:p:21-29 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jingfeng Yuan & Wei Li & Jiyue Guo & Xianbo Zhao & Mirosław J. Skibniewski, 2018. "Social Risk Factors of Transportation PPP Projects in China: A Sustainable Development Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Bin Xue & Bingsheng Liu & Ting Sun, 2018. "What Matters in Achieving Infrastructure Sustainability through Project Management Practices: A Preliminary Study of Critical Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Fuguo Cao & Cong Wang, 2022. "An Empirical Study of Determinants of Pay-for-Performance in PPP Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Tomi Rajala & Harri Laihonen & Jarmo Vakkuri, 2020. "Exploring challenges of boundary-crossing performance dialogues in hybrids," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 799-820, September.
    21. Hussain, Shahid & Xuetong, Wang & Maqbool, Rashid & Hussain, Mustansar & Shahnawaz, Muhammad, 2022. "The influence of government support, organizational innovativeness and community participation in renewable energy project success: A case of Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15808-:d:986338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.