IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/otamic/v16y2024i1p251-274n1017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-based integrated performance assessment framework for public-private partnership infrastructure projects

Author

Listed:
  • Fatima Anam

    (Department of Architectural Engineering & Design, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

  • Mubin Sajjad

    (Department of Architectural Engineering & Design, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

  • Masood Rehan

    (Ako Delivery—Region Four: Construction Services Team, College of Engineering, Construction and Living Sciences, department of Construction, Otago Polytechnic, Te Pūkenga, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)

Abstract

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) play a pivotal role in global infrastructure development, significantly impacting economic growth. However, a notable research gap exists in addressing risk management adequately within the performance assessment of PPP projects, particularly in developing nations like Pakistan. This study aims to address this gap by developing an integrated performance assessment framework (IPAF) in order to fill the deficiency of structured risk management in PPP project evaluations. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to devise a systematic methodology for assessing PPP project performance, with a keen emphasis on robust risk management criteria. Employing a comprehensive approach, the methodology integrates 16 performance measures (PMs) aligned with key performance indicators (KPIs), covering the triple constraints of projects (cost, time and quality) during the project feasibility, execution and operation and maintenance phases of project life cycle. Additionally, it incorporates an analysis of 10 prominent risks, spanning financial, environmental, operational, construction, legal and governmental dimensions inherent to PPP projects. The IPAF not only identifies these risks but also offers calculated mitigation strategies to enhance overall project performance. Emphasising alignment with project objectives, stakeholder engagement and contextual factors, the framework aids decision-makers, project managers and policymakers in making informed decisions throughout the project lifecycle. Furthermore, this study contributes by providing a systematic approach to address the critical bond between risk management and project performance in PPP projects. By bridging this gap, the IPAF fosters enhanced project outcomes, thereby contributing to the advancement of infrastructure development practices in both developed and developing contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatima Anam & Mubin Sajjad & Masood Rehan, 2024. "Risk-based integrated performance assessment framework for public-private partnership infrastructure projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 251-274.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:251-274:n:1017
    DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2024-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2024-0018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/otmcj-2024-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faruk Buyukyoran & Selin Gundes, 2018. "Optimized real options-based approach for government guarantees in PPP toll road projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 203-216, April.
    2. Kai Guo & Limao Zhang & Tao Wang, 2021. "Concession period optimisation in complex projects under uncertainty: a public–private partnership perspective," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 156-172, February.
    3. Jingfeng Yuan & Alex Yajun Zeng & Miroslaw Skibniewski & Qiming Li, 2009. "Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public-private partnership projects to achieve value for money," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 253-270.
    4. A. V. Thomas & Satyanarayana Kalidindi & K. Ananthanarayanan, 2003. "Risk perception analysis of BOT road project participants in India," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 393-407.
    5. Yanhong Liang & Hongdi Wang, 2019. "Sustainable Performance Measurements for Public–Private Partnership Projects: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Yan Wang & Yujie Wang & Xiuyu Wu & Jiwang Li, 2020. "Exploring the Risk Factors of Infrastructure PPP Projects for Sustainable Delivery: A Social Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kangsoo Kim & Jinoh Kim & Donghyung Yook, 2021. "Analysis of Features Affecting Contracted Rate of Return of Korean PPP Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Athena Roumboutsos & Alenka Temeljotov-Salaj & Iosif Karousos, 2020. "Indicators for Sustainable Demand Risk Allocation in Transport Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Isaac Akomea-Frimpong & Xiaohua Jin & Robert Osei-Kyei, 2022. "Mapping Studies on Sustainability in the Performance Measurement of Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Zuo, Jian & Zillante, George, 2013. "Factors influencing the success of BOT power plant projects in China: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 446-453.
    5. Henry J Liu & Peter ED Love & Jim Smith & Michael CP Sing & Jane Matthews, 2018. "Evaluation of public–private partnerships: A life-cycle Performance Prism for ensuring value for money," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(6), pages 1133-1153, September.
    6. Jiangang Shi & Kaifeng Duan & Guangdong Wu & Rui Zhang & Xiaowei Feng, 2020. "Comprehensive metrological and content analysis of the public–private partnerships (PPPs) research field: a new bibliometric journey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2145-2184, September.
    7. Jingfeng Yuan & Wenying Ji & Jiyue Guo & Mirosław J. Skibniewski, 2019. "Simulation-based dynamic adjustments of prices and subsidies for transportation PPP projects based on stakeholders’ satisfaction," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2309-2345, December.
    8. Philip Haynes & David Alemna, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Impact of Complexity Theory on Applied Economics," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Juan Du & Wenxin Wang & Xinghua Gao & Min Hu & Haili Jiang, 2023. "Sustainable Operations: A Systematic Operational Performance Evaluation Framework for Public–Private Partnership Transportation Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Weixia Lyu & Yanan Zheng & Camila Fonseca & Jerry Zhirong Zhao, 2020. "Public-Private Partnership Transformation and Worker Satisfaction: A Case Study of Sanitation Workers in H-City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    11. Nannan Wang & Minxun Ma & Yunfei Liu, 2020. "The Whole Lifecycle Management Efficiency of the Public Sector in PPP Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Xiaodan Zheng & Jingfeng Yuan & Jiyue Guo & Mirosław J. Skibniewski & Sujun Zhao, 2018. "Influence of Relational Norms on User Interests in PPP Projects: Mediating Effect of Project Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Abraham Park & Chen Yu Chang, 2013. "Impacts of Construction Events on the Project Equity Value of the Channel Tunnel Project," ERES eres2013_97, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    14. Guoxian Cao & Chaoyang Guo & Hezhong Li, 2022. "Risk Analysis of Public–Private Partnership Waste-to-Energy Incineration Projects from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Mohammed Khaled Al-Hanawi & Sarh Almubark & Ameerah M N Qattan & Agnieszka Cenkier & Ewa Agnieszka Kosycarz, 2020. "Barriers to the implementation of public-private partnerships in the healthcare sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Goran Amović & Rado Maksimović & Sonja Bunčić, 2020. "Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in Transition Conditions: An Empirical Study in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-29, September.
    17. Hongyan Chen & Ruwen Qin, 2012. "Real options as an incentive scheme for managing revenues in transportation infrastructure projects," International Journal of Revenue Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1/2), pages 77-101.
    18. Nimesha Sahani Jayasena & Daniel W. M. Chan & Mohan M. Kumaraswamy, 2022. "Is Public–Private Partnership (PPP) a Preferred Strategy for Procuring Smart Infrastructure in Developed Countries: An Empirical Study of the Perceived Benefits, Barriers and Recommended Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Fuguo Cao & Cong Wang, 2022. "An Empirical Study of Determinants of Pay-for-Performance in PPP Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Jin, Ruoyu & Chen, Qian & Soboyejo, Alfred, 2015. "Survey of the current status of sustainable concrete production in the U.S," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 148-159.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:251-274:n:1017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.