IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13963-d954865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Rong

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Liangfeng Shen

    (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

Abstract

The appropriate ecological operation method is suggested in order to create a harmonious human settlement environment and achieve the sustainable development of residential areas. The key to determining whether the model can be successfully implemented is now the stakeholders. Scholars feel that stakeholders in the urban development process should sustain collaboration, and they suggest collaborative measures because they have successfully identified these parties. Nevertheless, there are distinctions between the specialized research of ecological operation stakeholders and the disregard for internal differences of related groups. In order to examine the relationship strength and network density, structural location, and role interaction, this article employs social network analysis to examine the cohesiveness, relevance, reciprocity, transitivity, hierarchy, and agency of the stakeholder relationship network in the ecological operation. Interest disagreements, solutions, and recommendations among participants encourage the effective application of the ecological operating model. The study demonstrates that there are no factions, and that weak links dominate the stakeholder relationship network in ecological operations, exhibiting a “core-periphery” relationship structure. High relevance, high reciprocity, and high transmissibility describe the relationship network. Although the network’s overall power is dispersed, each group’s power is centralized. Residents and social organizations in residential areas are in a poor position, since governments at all levels have strong control over them. In order to optimize relationships and collaborative governance, which is helpful for implementing the ecological operation mode and realizing harmony and oneness between man and nature, the study explored the relationship network structure and features of stakeholders in the ecological operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Rong & Liangfeng Shen, 2022. "Study on the Ecological Operation Model of Settlements Based on Social Network Analysis: Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13963-:d:954865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13963/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13963/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanhong Liang & Hongdi Wang, 2019. "Sustainable Performance Measurements for Public–Private Partnership Projects: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Li Guo & Shuya Hao & Udara Ranasinghe & Maggie Liyaning Tang & Mary Hardie, 2021. "Stakeholder Collaboration Mechanism in Elderly Community Retrofit Projects: Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Nancy Johnson & Nina Lilja & Jacqueline A. Ashby & James A. Garcia, 2004. "The practice of participatory research and gender analysis in natural resource management," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 28(3), pages 189-200, August.
    4. Marco Nunes & António Abreu, 2020. "Applying Social Network Analysis to Identify Project Critical Success Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-32, February.
    5. Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska & Joanna Węgrzyn, 2019. "Understanding of Public–Private Partnership Stakeholders as a Condition of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyan Jiang & Kun Lu & Bo Xia & Yong Liu & Caiyun Cui, 2019. "Identifying Significant Risks and Analyzing Risk Relationship for Construction PPP Projects in China Using Integrated FISM-MICMAC Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Han Zhang & Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Xiaosu Ye & Hanyue Qi, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Team Interdependence on Cooperative Performance in Public–Private Partnership Projects: The Moderating Effect of Government Equity Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Yami, M. & Mekuria, Wolde, 2022. "Challenges in the governance of community-managed forests in Ethiopia: review," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-14(3):147.
    4. Marco Nunes & António Abreu & Célia Saraiva, 2021. "A Model to Manage Cooperative Project Risks to Create Knowledge and Drive Sustainable Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, May.
    5. Juan Du & Wenxin Wang & Xinghua Gao & Min Hu & Haili Jiang, 2023. "Sustainable Operations: A Systematic Operational Performance Evaluation Framework for Public–Private Partnership Transportation Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Alessandra Galiè, 2013. "Governance of seed and food security through participatory plant breeding: Empirical evidence and gender analysis from Syria," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(1), pages 31-42, February.
    7. Sharon Kwaramba & Stanley Murairwa, 2022. "Enhancing the quality of decisions by administrators: A framework for identifying, classifying and engaging primary school stakeholders in Harare, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(1), pages 46-56, January.
    8. Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Han Zhang & Hujun Li & Xiaosu Ye, 2023. "Research on the Influences of Task Interdependence on Team Performance in the Context of the Leader–Member Exchange Differentiation in the Public–Private Partnership Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Gunjan Saxena & Avani Mohan Singh, 2014. "Amorphous Family Nexus: An Analytical Tool in Considering Community/m-MGO Haritika's Ties in Bundelkhand, Central India," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(10), pages 2419-2434, October.
    10. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    11. Grace Namayombo Sukasuka & Innocent Musonda & Molusiwa Stephan Ramabodu & Sambo Lyson Zulu, 2022. "Social Dimensions in Ex-Post Evaluation of Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Mattia Ferrari, 2020. "Reflexive Governance for Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-8, December.
    13. Augustinas Maceika & Andrej Bugajev & Olga R. Šostak, 2019. "The Modelling of Roof Installation Projects Using Decision Trees and the AHP Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    15. Fuguo Cao & Cong Wang, 2022. "An Empirical Study of Determinants of Pay-for-Performance in PPP Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Alessio Paolucci & Sergio Sangiorgi & Marco Giovanni Mariani, 2021. "Non-Technical Skills in Social Networks: The Spread of Safety Communication and Teamwork in a Warehouse," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    17. Marco Nunes & Jelena Bagnjuk & António Abreu & Edgar Cardoso & Joane Smith & Célia Saraiva, 2023. "Managing Collaborative Risks of Integrated Open-Innovation and Hybrid Stage-Gate Model by Applying Social Network Analysis—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-33, March.
    18. Marco Nunes & António Abreu & Célia Saraiva, 2021. "Identifying Project Corporate Behavioral Risks to Support Long-Term Sustainable Cooperative Partnerships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, June.
    19. Marco Nunes & António Abreu, 2020. "Managing Open Innovation Project Risks Based on a Social Network Analysis Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-31, April.
    20. Mimica R. Milošević & Dušan M. Milošević & Ana D. Stanojević & Dragan M. Stević & Dušan J. Simjanović, 2021. "Fuzzy and Interval AHP Approaches in Sustainable Management for the Architectural Heritage in Smart Cities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13963-:d:954865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.