IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14910-d969683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bi-Objective Optimization Problems—A Game Theory Perspective to Improve Process and Product

Author

Listed:
  • Nuno Costa

    (Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, ESTSetúbal, Campus do IPS-Estefanilha, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal
    Research & Development Unit for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • João Lourenço

    (Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, ESTSetúbal, Campus do IPS-Estefanilha, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal)

Abstract

Cost-effective manufacturing processes or products are no longer the only requirements for business sustainability. An approach based on Game Theory is suggested to find solutions for bi-objective problems. In particular, Stackelberg’s technique is employed and complemented with the Factors Scaling tool to help the users in defining its strategy for optimizing process and product quality characteristics. No subjective information (shape factors, weights, and/or any other preference information) is required from the users, and basic computational background is enough for implementing it. Two case studies provide evidence that the suggested easy-to-use approach can yield nondominated solutions from a small number of Leader–Follower cycles, what reinforces its usefulness for bi-objective optimization problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuno Costa & João Lourenço, 2022. "Bi-Objective Optimization Problems—A Game Theory Perspective to Improve Process and Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14910-:d:969683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14910/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14910/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Myerson, 2010. "Nash Equilibrium and the History of Economic Theory," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 6.
    2. Haiying Zhou & Wenjing Zhang, 2022. "Choice of Emission Control Technology in Port Areas with Customers’ Low-Carbon Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Xiaohong Chen & Tianhu Deng & Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Yi Yu, 2023. "Mind the gap between research and practice in operations management," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 32-42, January.
    4. Martín Tanco & Elisabeth Viles & Laura Ilzarbe & María Jesus Alvarez, 2009. "Implementation of Design of Experiments projects in industry," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 478-505, July.
    5. Ryle S. Perera, 2021. "Transboundary Emission Under Stochastic Differential Game," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Manel Antelo & Lluís Bru, 2022. "Per-unit versus ad-valorem royalty licensing in a Stackelberg market," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(1), pages 95-109, March.
    7. Shubhro Sarkar & Suchismita Tarafdar, 2021. "Investment Choice with Managerial Incentive Schemes," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 1-34, June.
    8. Mohammadali S. Monfared & Sayyed Ehsan Monabbati & Mahsa Mahdipour Azar, 2020. "Bi-objective optimization problems with two decision makers: refining Pareto-optimal front for equilibrium solution," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(2), pages 567-584, June.
    9. Faruk Gul, 1997. "A Nobel Prize for Game Theorists: The Contributions of Harsanyi, Nash and Selten," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 159-174, Summer.
    10. Jing Qin & Kun Qin & Yuxiang Cheng & Desheng Wu, 2022. "Trade Credit Insurance for the Capital-Constrained Supplier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nir Billfeld & Moshe Kim, 2024. "Context-dependent Causality (the Non-Nonotonic Case)," Papers 2404.05021, arXiv.org.
    2. Paul Levine & Ron Smith, 2000. "Arms Export Controls and Proliferation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(6), pages 885-895, December.
    3. Cristiano Cantore & Vasco J. Gabriel & Paul Levine & Joseph Pearlman & Bo Yang, 2013. "The science and art of DSGE modelling: II – model comparisons, model validation, policy analysis and general discussion," Chapters, in: Nigar Hashimzade & Michael A. Thornton (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Macroeconomics, chapter 19, pages 441-463, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Brennan, Timothy J., 2000. "The Economics of Competition Policy: Recent Developments and Cautionary Notes in Antitrust and Regulation," Discussion Papers 10716, Resources for the Future.
    5. Fatih Karanfil, 2011. "Environmental regulation in the presence of unrecorded economy," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 126-127, pages 91-108.
    6. Antelo, Manel & Bru, Lluís, 2022. "Licensing in a Stackelberg industry, product differentiation, and welfare," MPRA Paper 114181, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Elizabeth Hoffman & Matthew L. Spitzer, 2011. "The Enduring Power of Coase," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 63-76.
    8. Bhatti, Bilal Ahmad & Broadwater, Robert, 2019. "Energy trading in the distribution system using a non-model based game theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Arshad Ali Javed & Patrick T.I. Lam & Albert P.C. Chan, 2014. "Change negotiation in public-private partnership projects through output specifications: an experimental approach based on game theory," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 323-348, April.
    10. Pedro Garcia Duarte & Yann Giraud, 2014. "Chasing the B: A Bibliographic Account of Economics’ Relation to its Past, 1991-2011," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2014_06, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    11. Magnoli Bocchi, Alessandro, 2008. "Rising growth, declining investment : the puzzle of the Philippines," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4472, The World Bank.
    12. Yunesky Masip Macía & Jacqueline Pedrera & Max Túlio Castro & Guillermo Vilalta, 2019. "Analysis of Energy Sustainability in Ore Slurry Pumping Transport Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Crawford, VP, 2014. "Boundedly rational versus optimization-based models of strategic thinking and learning in games," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt04h694rz, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    14. Alejandro Agafonow, 2009. "Venezuelan Economic Laboratory. The Case of the Altruistic Economy of Felipe Pérez Martí," Working Papers wpdea0911, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    15. Filippo Fabiani & Barbara Franci, 2023. "On Distributionally Robust Generalized Nash Games Defined over the Wasserstein Ball," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 298-309, October.
    16. Iris Lorscheid & Bernd-Oliver Heine & Matthias Meyer, 2012. "Opening the ‘black box’ of simulations: increased transparency and effective communication through the systematic design of experiments," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 22-62, March.
    17. Charles F. Manski, 2000. "Economic Analysis of Social Interactions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 115-136, Summer.
    18. Paul Levine, 2012. "Monetary policy in an uncertain world: probability models and the design of robust monetary rules," Indian Growth and Development Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(1), pages 70-88, April.
    19. Besseris, George J., 2012. "Profiling effects in industrial data mining by non-parametric DOE methods: An application on screening checkweighing systems in packaging operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 147-161.
    20. Vincent P. Crawford, 2016. "New Directions for Modelling Strategic Behavior: Game-Theoretic Models of Communication, Coordination, and Cooperation in Economic Relationships," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(4), pages 131-150, Fall.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14910-:d:969683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.