IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/orspec/v42y2020i2d10.1007_s00291-020-00587-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bi-objective optimization problems with two decision makers: refining Pareto-optimal front for equilibrium solution

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammadali S. Monfared

    (Alzahra University)

  • Sayyed Ehsan Monabbati

    (Alzahra University)

  • Mahsa Mahdipour Azar

    (Alzahra University)

Abstract

The Pareto-optimality concept in multi-objective optimization theory is different from the Nash equilibrium concept in noncooperative game theory. When the objective holders are independent decision makers, i.e., human entities or organizations, any solution on the Pareto-optimal front is not necessarily an equilibrium point, hence not a valid solution. The solution has to be a Pareto-optimal-equilibrium (POE) point. In this paper, we convert a bi-objective optimization problem into a two-player game problem by introducing “induced games,” and we propose a new refinement method to find a POE point. We prove that at least one such POE point exists for a class of linear bi-objective optimization problems, and we develop an algorithm to find it. We discuss that the innovative approach considered in this paper is of real future interest to some industrial and social applications. One such example is also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammadali S. Monfared & Sayyed Ehsan Monabbati & Mahsa Mahdipour Azar, 2020. "Bi-objective optimization problems with two decision makers: refining Pareto-optimal front for equilibrium solution," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(2), pages 567-584, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:42:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s00291-020-00587-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00291-020-00587-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00291-020-00587-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00291-020-00587-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xiuli & Geng, Sujie & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Negotiation mechanisms for an order subcontracting and scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 154-167.
    2. Karray, Salma & Sigué, Simon Pierre, 2015. "A game-theoretic model for co-promotions: Choosing a complementary versus an independent product ally," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 84-100.
    3. Tsionas, Mike G., 2018. "A Bayesian approach to find Pareto optima in multiobjective programming problems using Sequential Monte Carlo algorithms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 73-79.
    4. Peeters, R.J.A.P. & Potters, J.A.M., 1999. "On the Structure of the Set of Correlated Equilibria in Two-by-Two Bimatrix Games," Discussion Paper 1999-45, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. T. H. Matheiss & David S. Rubin, 1980. "A Survey and Comparison of Methods for Finding All Vertices of Convex Polyhedral Sets," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 167-185, May.
    6. Yu, Shiwei & Zheng, Shuhong & Gao, Shiwei & Yang, Juan, 2017. "A multi-objective decision model for investment in energy savings and emission reductions in coal mining," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 335-347.
    7. Braekers, Kris & Hartl, Richard F. & Parragh, Sophie N. & Tricoire, Fabien, 2016. "A bi-objective home care scheduling problem: Analyzing the trade-off between costs and client inconvenience," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 428-443.
    8. Martin J. Osborne & Ariel Rubinstein, 1994. "A Course in Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262650401, April.
    9. Defryn, Christof & Sörensen, Kenneth & Dullaert, Wout, 2019. "Integrating partner objectives in horizontal logistics optimisation models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nuno Costa & João Lourenço, 2022. "Bi-Objective Optimization Problems—A Game Theory Perspective to Improve Process and Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Battigalli, Pierpaolo & Bonanno, Giacomo, 1997. "The Logic of Belief Persistence," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 39-59, April.
    2. Szabó, György & Borsos, István & Szombati, Edit, 2019. "Games, graphs and Kirchhoff laws," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 416-423.
    3. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Marc Le Menestrel, 2003. "A one-shot Prisoners’ Dilemma with procedural utility," Economics Working Papers 819, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    5. Cheng‐Kuang Wu & Yi‐Ming Chen & Dachrahn Wu & Ching‐Lin Chi, 2020. "A Game Theory Approach for Assessment of Risk and Deployment of Police Patrols in Response to Criminal Activity in San Francisco," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 534-549, March.
    6. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F. & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2020. "Pushing frontiers in auction-based transport collaborations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Nasimeh Heydaribeni & Achilleas Anastasopoulos, 2019. "Linear Equilibria for Dynamic LQG Games with Asymmetric Information and Dependent Types," Papers 1909.04834, arXiv.org.
    8. Müller, Christoph, 2020. "Robust implementation in weakly perfect Bayesian strategies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Gomes, Maria Isabel & Ramos, Tânia Rodrigues Pereira, 2019. "Modelling and (re-)planning periodic home social care services with loyalty and non-loyalty features," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 284-299.
    10. Hitoshi Matsushima, 2019. "Implementation without expected utility: ex-post verifiability," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(4), pages 575-585, December.
    11. Dasgupta Utteeyo, 2011. "Are Entry Threats Always Credible?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-41, December.
    12. Baran Han, 2018. "The role and welfare rationale of secondary sanctions: A theory and a case study of the US sanctions targeting Iran," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(5), pages 474-502, September.
    13. Carlos Pimienta & Jianfei Shen, 2014. "On the equivalence between (quasi-)perfect and sequential equilibria," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(2), pages 395-402, May.
    14. Asheim, Geir & Søvik, Ylva, 2003. "The semantics of preference-based belief operators," Memorandum 05/2003, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    15. Salvador Barberà & Anke Gerber, 2024. "On the Endogenous Order of Play in Sequential Games," Working Papers 1443, Barcelona School of Economics.
    16. Wang, Yafeng & Graham, Brett, 2009. "Generalized Maximum Entropy estimation of discrete sequential move games of perfect information," MPRA Paper 21331, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6818 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Tobias Harks & Martin Hoefer & Anja Schedel & Manuel Surek, 2021. "Efficient Black-Box Reductions for Separable Cost Sharing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 134-158, February.
    19. Pahlevani, Delaram & Abbasi, Babak & Hearne, John W. & Eberhard, Andrew, 2022. "A cluster-based algorithm for home health care planning: A case study in Australia," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    20. Karbowski, Adam, 2011. "O kilku modelach samolubnego karania w ekonomii behawioralnej [Evolution of altruism in the light of behavioral economics]," MPRA Paper 69604, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Tsionas, Mike G., 2019. "Multi-objective optimization using statistical models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 364-378.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:42:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s00291-020-00587-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.