IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14621-d965420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Approach to Map the Impact of Climate Change on the Distributions of Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna in Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Author

Listed:
  • Kalthum O. Radha

    (Department of Biology, College of Education, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani 334, Kurdistan Region, Iraq)

  • Nabaz R. Khwarahm

    (Department of Biology, College of Education, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani 334, Kurdistan Region, Iraq)

Abstract

The hawthorns Crataegus azarolus L. and Crataegus monogyna Jacq are two ecologically and medicinally important endemic tree species that occur only in forests of oak in the mountain ranges of the Kurdistan region of Iraq (KRI). These species have been degrading across the mountain ranges at an alarming pace due to climate-related factors (e.g., wildfire events and drought) and anthropogenic drivers. Nevertheless, there is a gap in understanding their distributions today and in the future under a changing climate in Iraq. To address the species’ knowledge gap and thus establish a baseline for a future management and conservation strategy, this study used field observation records, species distribution modeling integrated with GIS techniques, and relevant environmental predictors to (i) estimate the species’ potential distributions and map their current known distributions across unsurveyed areas; (ii) model the species’ possible response under several scenarios for a weather change in the future; (iii) map the species’ overlap ranges and the direction of the distributions. Results suggest that under two global climatic models (GCMs), BCC-CSM2-MR and CNRM-CM6-1, the overall habitat expansion magnitude for the two species would be less than the overall habitat reduction magnitude. For C. azarolus, the habitat range would contract by 3714.64 km 2 (7.20%) and 3550.47 km 2 (6.89%), whereas it would expand by 2415.90 km 2 (4.68%) and 1627.76 km 2 (3.16%) for the GCMs, respectively. Modeling also demonstrated a similar pattern for C. monogyna. The species overlap by 7626.53 km 2 (14.80%) and 7351.45 km2 (14.27%) for the two GCMs. The two species’ habitat ranges would contract significantly due to the changing climate. The direction of the species’ potential distribution would be mostly toward the KRI’s east and southeast mountain forests. Our results, for the first time, provide new data on the species’ present and future distributions and outline the advantages of distribution modeling combined with geospatial techniques in areas where species data are limited, such as Iraq.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalthum O. Radha & Nabaz R. Khwarahm, 2022. "An Integrated Approach to Map the Impact of Climate Change on the Distributions of Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna in Kurdistan Region, Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-31, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14621-:d:965420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14621/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14621/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boria, Robert A. & Olson, Link E. & Goodman, Steven M. & Anderson, Robert P., 2014. "Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 73-77.
    2. H. Oğuz Çoban & Ömer K. Örücü & E. Seda Arslan, 2020. "MaxEnt Modeling for Predicting the Current and Future Potential Geographical Distribution of Quercus libani Olivier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barham A. HamadAmin & Nabaz R. Khwarahm, 2023. "Mapping Impacts of Climate Change on the Distributions of Two Endemic Tree Species under Socioeconomic Pathway Scenarios (SSP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Nabaz R. Khwarahm, 2023. "Predicting the Spatial Distribution of Hyalomma ssp., Vector Ticks of Crimean–Congo Haemorrhagic Fever in Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jocelyn M. Velázquez-Hernández & José Ariel Ruíz-Corral & Noé Durán-Puga & Diego R. González-Eguiarte & Fernando Santacruz-Ruvalcaba & Giovanni Emmanuel García-Romero & Jesús Germán de la Mora-Castañe, 2023. "Eco-Geography of Dioscorea composita (Hemsl.) in México and Central America under the Influence of Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. B Eugene Smith & Mark K Johnston & Robert Lücking, 2016. "From GenBank to GBIF: Phylogeny-Based Predictive Niche Modeling Tests Accuracy of Taxonomic Identifications in Large Occurrence Data Repositories," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Ramos, Rodrigo Soares & Kumar, Lalit & Shabani, Farzin & Picanço, Marcelo Coutinho, 2019. "Risk of spread of tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) in tomato crops under various climate change scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 524-535.
    4. Fourcade, Yoan, 2021. "Fine-tuning niche models matters in invasion ecology. A lesson from the land planarian Obama nungara," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    5. Feng Dong & Chih-Ming Hung & Shou-Hsien Li & Xiao-Jun Yang, 2021. "Potential Himalayan community turnover through the Late Pleistocene," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Christophe Botella & Alexis Joly & Pascal Monestiez & Pierre Bonnet & François Munoz, 2020. "Bias in presence-only niche models related to sampling effort and species niches: Lessons for background point selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Dana H. Mills & Michael L. McKinney, 2024. "Climate Change and Jump Dispersal Drive Invasion of the Rosy Wolfsnail ( Euglandina rosea ) in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Zeng, Yiwen & Low, Bi Wei & Yeo, Darren C.J., 2016. "Novel methods to select environmental variables in MaxEnt: A case study using invasive crayfish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 5-13.
    9. Schartel, Tyler E. & Cao, Yong, 2024. "Background selection complexity influences Maxent predictive performance in freshwater systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    10. Van Eupen, Camille & Maes, Dirk & Herremans, Marc & Swinnen, Kristijn R.R. & Somers, Ben & Luca, Stijn, 2021. "The impact of data quality filtering of opportunistic citizen science data on species distribution model performance," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 444(C).
    11. Yinglian Qi & Xiaoyan Pu & Yaxiong Li & Dingai Li & Mingrui Huang & Xuan Zheng & Jiaxin Guo & Zhi Chen, 2022. "Prediction of Suitable Distribution Area of Plateau pika ( Ochotona curzoniae ) in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Sillero, Neftalí & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Enriquez‐Urzelai, Urtzi & Vale, Cândida Gomes & Sousa-Guedes, Diana & Martínez-Freiría, Fernando & Real, Raimundo & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2021. "Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    13. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A. Townsend Peterson & Karla Rodríguez-Medina & Narayani Barve, 2016. "Mapping current and future potential snakebite risk in the new world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 697-711, February.
    14. Siyuan Xie & He Si & Hongxia Sun & Qian Zhao & Xiaodong Li & Shiqiang Wang & Junfeng Niu & Zhezhi Wang, 2023. "Predicting the Potential Distribution of the Endangered Plant Eucommia ulmoides in China under the Background of Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A. Townsend Peterson & Karla Rodríguez-Medina & Narayani Barve, 2016. "Mapping current and future potential snakebite risk in the new world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 697-711, February.
    16. Herkt, K. Matthias B. & Barnikel, Günter & Skidmore, Andrew K. & Fahr, Jakob, 2016. "A high-resolution model of bat diversity and endemism for continental Africa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 9-28.
    17. Marsh, Charles J. & Gavish, Yoni & Kuemmerlen, Mathias & Stoll, Stefan & Haase, Peter & Kunin, William E., 2023. "SDM profiling: A tool for assessing the information-content of sampled and unsampled locations for species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    18. Dimitra-Lida Rammou & Christos Astaras & Despina Migli & George Boutsis & Antonia Galanaki & Theodoros Kominos & Dionisios Youlatos, 2022. "European Ground Squirrels at the Edge: Current Distribution Status and Anticipated Impact of Climate on Europe’s Southernmost Population," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Robin Lines & Dimitrios Bormpoudakis & Panteleimon Xofis & Joseph Tzanopoulos, 2021. "Modelling Multi-Species Connectivity at the Kafue-Zambezi Interface: Implications for Transboundary Carnivore Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Sutton, G.F. & Martin, G.D., 2022. "Testing MaxEnt model performance in a novel geographic region using an intentionally introduced insect," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14621-:d:965420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.