IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14060-d956616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact Modeling for a Small-Scale Field Test of Methane Removal by Iron Salt Aerosols

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy M. Sturtz

    (ESA—Environmental Science Associates, 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Seattle, WA 98107, USA)

  • Peter T. Jenkins

    (Methane Action, 4507 Maple Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA)

  • Renaud de Richter

    (Engineering School of Chemistry, University of Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France)

Abstract

Various authors have highlighted the possible removal of methane from the atmosphere via oxidation by broad releases of iron salt aerosols in order to serve climate protection goals. This technique is known as enhanced atmospheric methane oxidation (EAMO). This study proposes and employs a modeling approach for the potential environmental impacts associated with a hypothetical small-scale field test of EAMO consisting of seeding cargo-ship exhaust plumes with iron salt aerosols. Using a sample region in the Southern Caribbean Sea as a hypothetical testing site, it provides assessments of potential impacts to air quality, human health, and the marine environment. The modeling focuses on the incremental difference between conducting the hypothetical field test and a no-action scenario. The model results are compared to ambient air standards and pertinent screening thresholds, including those associated with pertinent health risk metrics. The overall loading to the marine environment is contrasted against background rates of iron deposition to the marine surface. No significant impacts were identified in this assessment. The hypothetical atmospheric emissions of both FeCl 3 and HCl that the ship’s crew may be exposed to remained below governmental guidance levels. The potential deposition of FeCl 3 to the marine environment was found to be very minor in relation to the natural contributions experienced within the Southern Caribbean. Similarly, HCl deposition was assessed for potential impacts to the marine environment but was found to have no significant impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy M. Sturtz & Peter T. Jenkins & Renaud de Richter, 2022. "Environmental Impact Modeling for a Small-Scale Field Test of Methane Removal by Iron Salt Aerosols," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14060-:d:956616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14060/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14060/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie A. Henson & B. B. Cael & Stephanie R. Allen & Stephanie Dutkiewicz, 2021. "Future phytoplankton diversity in a changing climate," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. B. E. Lapointe & R. A. Brewton & L. W. Herren & M. Wang & C. Hu & D. J. McGillicuddy & S. Lindell & F. J. Hernandez & P. L. Morton, 2021. "Nutrient content and stoichiometry of pelagic Sargassum reflects increasing nitrogen availability in the Atlantic Basin," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Ken Caldeira & Michael E. Wickett, 2003. "Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6956), pages 365-365, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Detlef Vuuren & Elke Stehfest, 2013. "If climate action becomes urgent: the importance of response times for various climate strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 473-486, December.
    2. Pearce, Joshua M. & Johnson, Sara J. & Grant, Gabriel B., 2007. "3D-mapping optimization of embodied energy of transportation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 435-453.
    3. Bourret, A. & Martin, Y. & Troussellier, M., 2007. "Modelling the response of microbial food web to an increase of atmospheric CO2 partial pressure in a marine Mediterranean coastal ecosystem (Brusc Lagoon, France)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 189-204.
    4. Malone, Thomas C. & DiGiacomo, Paul M. & Gonçalves, Emanuel & Knap, Anthony H. & Talaue-McManus, Liana & de Mora, Stephen, 2014. "A global ocean observing system framework for sustainable development," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 262-272.
    5. Simen Alexander Linge Johnsen & Jörg Bollmann, 2020. "Coccolith mass and morphology of different Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes: A critical examination using Canary Islands material," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Sauterey, Boris & Gland, Guillaume Le & Cermeño, Pedro & Aumont, Olivier & Lévy, Marina & Vallina, Sergio M., 2023. "Phytoplankton adaptive resilience to climate change collapses in case of extreme events – A modeling study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    7. Ollier Clifford, 2019. "The hoax of ocean acidification," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(3), pages 59-66, September.
    8. J Timothy Wootton & Catherine A Pfister, 2012. "Carbon System Measurements and Potential Climatic Drivers at a Site of Rapidly Declining Ocean pH," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Rau, Greg H. & Knauss, Kevin G. & Langer, William H. & Caldeira, Ken, 2007. "Reducing energy-related CO2 emissions using accelerated weathering of limestone," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1471-1477.
    10. Unruh, Gregory C. & Carrillo-Hermosilla, Javier, 2006. "Globalizing carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1185-1197, July.
    11. Ponce Oliva, Roberto D. & Vasquez-Lavín, Felipe & San Martin, Valeska A. & Hernández, José Ignacio & Vargas, Cristian A. & Gonzalez, Pablo S. & Gelcich, Stefan, 2019. "Ocean Acidification, Consumers' Preferences, and Market Adaptation Strategies in the Mussel Aquaculture Industry," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 42-50.
    12. Greasley, David & Hanley, Nicholas & Kunnas, Jan & McLaughlin, Eoin & Oxley, Les & Warde, Paul, 2012. "How Environmental Pollution from Fossil Fuels can be included in measures of National Accounts and Estimates of Genuine Savings," Stirling Economics Discussion Papers 2012-16, University of Stirling, Division of Economics.
    13. Daiju Narita & Katrin Rehdanz & Richard Tol, 2012. "Economic costs of ocean acidification: a look into the impacts on global shellfish production," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 1049-1063, August.
    14. Alva-Basurto, Jorge Christian & Arias-González, Jesús Ernesto, 2014. "Modelling the effects of climate change on a Caribbean coral reef food web," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 1-14.
    15. Jie Wang & Peiling Yao & Jiaming Liu & Xun Wang & Jingjing Mao & Jiayuan Xu & Jiarui Wang, 2023. "Reconstruction of Surface Seawater pH in the North Pacific," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Choi, Jun-Ki & Friley, Paul & Alfstad, Thomas, 2012. "Implications of energy policy on a product system's dynamic life-cycle environmental impact: Survey and model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4744-4752.
    17. Narita, Daiju & Rehdanz, Katrin & Tol, Richard S. J., 2011. "Economic Costs of Ocean Acidification: A Look into the Impacts on Shellfish Production," Papers WP391, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    18. Occhipinti, Guido & Solidoro, Cosimo & Grimaudo, Roberto & Valenti, Davide & Lazzari, Paolo, 2023. "Marine ecosystem models of realistic complexity rarely exhibits significant endogenous non-stationary dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    19. Futing Zhang & Zuozhu Wen & Shanlin Wang & Weiyi Tang & Ya-Wei Luo & Sven A. Kranz & Haizheng Hong & Dalin Shi, 2022. "Phosphate limitation intensifies negative effects of ocean acidification on globally important nitrogen fixing cyanobacterium," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Ren, Jeffrey S. & Ragg, Norman L.C. & Cummings, Vonda J. & Zhang, Jihong, 2020. "Ocean acidification and dynamic energy budget models: Parameterisation and simulations for the green-lipped mussel," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 426(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14060-:d:956616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.