IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13644-d949397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Socioeconomic Drivers of Ethical Food Consumption in Ecuador: A Quantitative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Vasco

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito 170129, Ecuador)

  • Diego Salazar

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito 170129, Ecuador)

  • Darío Cepeda

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito 170129, Ecuador)

  • Gustavo Sevillano

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito 170129, Ecuador)

  • Juan Pazmiño

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito 170129, Ecuador)

  • Shirley Huerta

    (Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil 090514, Ecuador)

Abstract

A significant body of research has analyzed the socioeconomic determinants of ethical consumption, nevertheless, most of those studies have been conducted in high-income countries. With data from a survey with national representation (n = 11,526), this study aimed at analyzing the socioeconomic factors shaping decisions of ethical consumption in Ecuador, a middle-income country, where agroecological production has been proposed as a strategy to reduce rural poverty while promoting sustainable agriculture. Price is the principal purchasing criterion for 78% of the households in the sample, while ecological/organic label and support to local farmers account for 11 and 3% of the sample, respectively. Brand is the principal buying criterion for 8% of the sample. Consistent with prior research, the results of a multinomial probit regression show that ecological consumers are statistically likely to be wealthier and more educated than their price-driven counterparts. Contrary to the findings of previous research in Ecuador, ecological consumers do exhibit environmental awareness. Those with support to local producers as their main purchasing driver are also featured by high levels of wealth and education, nevertheless, they are not as concerned about the environment as their ecological counterparts. The implications of these findings for policy are explored in the Discussion section.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Vasco & Diego Salazar & Darío Cepeda & Gustavo Sevillano & Juan Pazmiño & Shirley Huerta, 2022. "The Socioeconomic Drivers of Ethical Food Consumption in Ecuador: A Quantitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13644-:d:949397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Auriol, Emmanuelle & Schilizzi, Steven G.M., 2015. "Quality signaling through certification in developing countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 105-121.
    2. Samia Ayyub & Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Asim Nawaz, 2021. "Drivers of Organic Food Purchase Intention in a Developing Country: The Mediating Role of Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    3. Starr, Martha A., 2009. "The social economics of ethical consumption: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 916-925, December.
    4. Vasco, Cristian & Tamayo, Grace Natalie, 2017. "Determinants of non-farm employment and non-farm earnings in Ecuador," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    5. Erin Nelson & Laura Gómez Tovar & Rita Schwentesius Rindermann & Manuel Gómez Cruz, 2010. "Participatory organic certification in Mexico: an alternative approach to maintaining the integrity of the organic label," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(2), pages 227-237, June.
    6. Elepu, Gabriel & Mazzocco, Michael A., 2010. "Consumer Segments in Urban and Suburban Farmers Markets," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Onianwa, Odili & Mojica, Maribel N. & Wheelock, Gerald, 2006. "Consumer Characteristics and Views Regarding Farmers Markets: An Examination of On-Site Survey Data of Alabama Consumers," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 37(1), pages 1-7, March.
    8. Ben McKay & Ryan Nehring, 2014. "Sustainable Agriculture: An Assessment of Brazil’s Family Farm Programmes in Scaling up Agroecological Food Production," Working Papers 123, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    9. Gabriel April-Lalonde & Sara Latorre & Myriam Paredes & María Fernanda Hurtado & Fabián Muñoz & Ana Deaconu & Donald C. Cole & Malek Batal, 2020. "Characteristics and Motivations of Consumers of Direct Purchasing Channels and the Perceived Barriers to Alternative Food Purchase: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Ecuadorian Andes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    10. David Conner & Kathryn Colasanti & R. Brent Ross & Susan B. Smalley, 2010. "Locally Grown Foods and Farmers Markets: Consumer Attitudes and Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Vasco, Cristian & Torres, Bolier & Jácome, Estefanía & Torres, Alexandra & Eche, David & Velasco, Christian, 2021. "Use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in frontier areas: A case study in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Xiao, Lu & Liu, Jianyue & Ge, Jinwen, 2021. "Dynamic game in agriculture and industry cross-sectoral water pollution governance in developing countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    13. Linders, Hubert, 2014. "Consumo ético, consumo saludable: ¿Existe un nuevo consumidor en América Latina?," Seminarios y Conferencias 44256, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    14. Linda Lobao & Curtis Stofferahn, 2008. "The community effects of industrialized farming: Social science research and challenges to corporate farming laws," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(2), pages 219-240, June.
    15. Elsa M. Ordway & Rosamond L. Naylor & Raymond N. Nkongho & Eric F. Lambin, 2019. "Oil palm expansion and deforestation in Southwest Cameroon associated with proliferation of informal mills," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao-Jung R. Chen & Tun-Hsiang Edward Yu & Rachel J. C. Fu, 2021. "Strategic Management for Community-Based Markets: From Consumers’ Perspectives and Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Yeong Sheng Tey & Poppy Arsil & Mark Brindal & Chi Teen Teoh & Han Wei Lim, 2017. "Motivations Underlying Consumers’ Preference for Farmers’ Markets in Klang Valley: A Means-End Chain Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Nicole Didero & Marco Costanigro & Becca B. R. Jablonski, 2021. "Promoting farmers market via information nudges and coupons: A randomized control trial," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 531-549, July.
    4. Gallardo, R. Karina & Olanie, Aaron & Ordóñez, Rita & Ostrom, Ostrom, 2015. "The Use of Electronic Payment Machines at Farmers Markets: Results from a Choice Experiment Study," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Onyango, Benjamin & Govindasamy, Ramu & Alsup-Egbers, Clydette Michelle, 2015. "Uncovering Success Attributes for Direct Farmers’ Markets and Agri-Tourism in the Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Birch, Dawn & Memery, Juliet & De Silva Kanakaratne, Maheshan, 2018. "The mindful consumer: Balancing egoistic and altruistic motivations to purchase local food," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 221-228.
    7. Sahand Ashtab & Robert Campbell, 2021. "Explanatory Analysis of Factors Influencing the Support for Sustainable Food Production and Distribution Systems: Results from a Rural Canadian Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Anderson, Langston & Hargrove, Tasha M. & Zabawa, Robert & Zekeri, Andrew A., 2017. "Assessing Marketing Alternatives for Small Farmers in Selected Alabama Black Belt Counties," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 4(2), June.
    9. Stobbe, Tracy, 2016. "Making Sense of the Dollars Spent at Farmers’ Markets," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(2), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Bi-Kun Tsai, 2019. "Determinants of Consumers’ Retention and Subjective Well-Being: A Sustainable Farmers’ Market Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Gréta Maró & Péter Czine & Zalán Márk Maró & Áron Török, 2022. "Eliciting University Students’ Attitudes towards Farmers’ Markets: The Hungarian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    12. González-Azcárate, Mario & Cruz-Maceín, José Luis & Bardají, Isabel, 2022. "Certifications in short food supply chains in the region of Madrid. Part of the alternative?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    13. Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Edward Majewski & Adam Wąs & Svein Ole Borgen & Peter Csillag & Michele Donati & Richard Freeman & Viet Hoàng & Jean-Loup Lecoeur & Maria Cecilia Mancini & An Nguyen & Monia , 2019. "Measuring the Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability of Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Christopher Jeffords, 2014. "Preference-directed regulation when ethical environmental policy choices are formed with limited information," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 573-606, March.
    15. Demartini, Eugenio & Ricci, Elena Claire & Mattavelli, Simone & Stranieri, Stefanella & Gaviglio, Anna & Banterle, Alessandro & Richetin, Juliette & Perugini, Marco, 2018. "Exploring Consumer Biased Evaluations: Halos Effects of Local Food and of Related Attributes," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(4), August.
    16. Mamen Cuéllar-Padilla & Ernesto Ganuza-Fernandez, 2018. "We Don’t Want to Be Officially Certified! Reasons and Implications of the Participatory Guarantee Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Seufert, Verena & Ramankutty, Navin & Mayerhofer, Tabea, 2017. "What is this thing called organic? – How organic farming is codified in regulations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 10-20.
    18. Printezis, Iryna & Grebitus, Carola, 2018. "Marketing Channels for Local Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 161-171.
    19. Karoline Gamma & Robert Mai & Moritz Loock, 2020. "The Double-Edged Sword of Ethical Nudges: Does Inducing Hypocrisy Help or Hinder the Adoption of Pro-environmental Behaviors?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 351-373, January.
    20. Patient Rambe & Takawira Munyaradzi Ndofirepi, 2016. "Influence of Small Business Ethics on Buying Decisions of Customers: A case of Indigenous Owned Fast-Food Outlets in Zimbabwe," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(5), pages 169-183.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13644-:d:949397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.