IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9537-d879597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Critical Success Factors for BIM Implementation in Developing Countries: Sampling the Turkish AEC Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Seda Tan

    (Department of Architecture, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep 270000, Turkey)

  • Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp

    (Department of Architecture, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep 270000, Turkey)

  • Muhammed Zubeyr Tel

    (Department of Architecture, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep 270000, Turkey)

  • Merve Serter

    (Department of Architecture, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep 270000, Turkey)

  • Yusuf Berkay Metinal

    (Department of Architecture, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep 270000, Turkey)

Abstract

One of the latest advancements transforming the global architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is building information modeling (BIM). Although BIM implementation is at high level in developed countries, it is at a lower level in developing countries. BIM is new to the construction industry in Turkey, with only minor construction firms having implemented it. When making projections based on the current state of the Turkish AEC industry, it is foreseen that it will become mandatory in the near future. Considering this projection, it is doubtful that many construction companies will be caught unprepared for this situation and will not know how to implement BIM. Therefore, this study aimed to identify and model the critical success factors for BIM implementation and their impact size in order to gain insight for the fast and efficient implementation of BIM among construction firms in the Turkish AEC industry, which can be generalized for most developing countries. To reach these aims, a questionnaire was designed with 41 identified success criteria (SC) that were derived through a systematic literature review (SLR). The survey was conducted on construction professionals who actively implement BIM technology at their occupied firms in Turkey and they were asked to rank the importance of 41 SC on a five-point Likert scale. The sampling frame consisted of architects and civil engineers, and in total, 243 responses were received. The differentiation between SC and critical success criteria (CSC) was obtained by using a normalized mean cutoff value. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to identify the critical success factors (CSFs), and structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the underlying size effects of each CSF on BIM implementation in the Turkish AEC industry. The results of this study reveal 20 CSC for successful BIM implementation, and EFA exhibited three CSFs from 20 CSC. Three critical success factors for BIM implementation in the Turkish construction industry were determined and grouped into two categories. “Awareness of technological benefits” and “organizational readiness and competitive advantages” formed one group and are the most influential critical success factors for BIM implementation. “Motivation of management regarding BIM” formed the second group of critical success factors that have a significant effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Seda Tan & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Muhammed Zubeyr Tel & Merve Serter & Yusuf Berkay Metinal, 2022. "Modeling the Critical Success Factors for BIM Implementation in Developing Countries: Sampling the Turkish AEC Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9537-:d:879597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9537/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9537/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David L. Olson & Desheng Dash Wu, 2015. "Enterprise Risk Management," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, chapter 1, pages 3-12, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Yingnan Yang & Yidan Zhang & Hongming Xie, 2020. "Exploring Cultivation Path of Building Information Modelling in China: An Analysis from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Suna Ozyuksel & Yavuz Bacak, 2020. "Impact of Engineering Insurances on the Growth of Turkish Construction Sector," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Seyed Armin Mirhosseini & Reza Kiani Mavi & Neda Kiani Mavi & Behzad Abbasnejad & Farzaneh Rayani, 2020. "Interrelations among Leadership Competencies of BIM Leaders: A Fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-30, September.
    5. Fariborz Damanpour & Kathryn A. Szabat & William M. Evan, 1989. "The Relationship Between Types Of Innovation And Organizational Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 587-602, November.
    6. Guofeng Ma & Jianyao Jia & Jiyong Ding & Shanshan Shang & Shan Jiang, 2019. "Interpretive Structural Model Based Factor Analysis of BIM Adoption in Chinese Construction Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Akintola Akintoye, 2000. "Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 77-89.
    8. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Timothy O. Olawumi & Daniel W.M. Chan, 2019. "Critical success factors for implementing building information modeling and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 587-602, July.
    10. Gökhan Demirdöğen & Zeynep Işık & Yusuf Arayici, 2020. "Lean Management Framework for Healthcare Facilities Integrating BIM, BEPS and Big Data Analytics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-33, August.
    11. Jay Na Lim & George Ofori, 2007. "Classification of innovation for strategic decision making in construction businesses," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 963-978.
    12. David L Olson & Desheng Dash Wu, 2015. "Enterprise Risk Management," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 9378, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    2. Kamil J. Mizgier & Joseph M. Pasia & Srinivas Talluri, 2017. "Multiobjective capital allocation for supplier development under risk," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 5243-5258, September.
    3. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Nawrocki, Tomasz L., 2019. "Holistic fuzzy evaluation of operational risk in polish mining enterprises in a long-term and sectoral research perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Sadeghi, Razieh, 2019. "Pricing strategies in the competitive reverse supply chains with traditional and e-channels: A game theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 48-60.
    5. Caraiman Adrian-Cosmin & Mates Dorel, 2020. "Risk management in corporate governance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 182-201, July.
    6. Levente Bakos & Dănuț Dumitru Dumitrașcu, 2021. "Decentralized Enterprise Risk Management Issues under Rapidly Changing Environments," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Junwei Zheng & Guangdong Wu, 2018. "Work-Family Conflict, Perceived Organizational Support and Professional Commitment: A Mediation Mechanism for Chinese Project Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Bingsheng Liu & Meiqing Fu & Shuibo Zhang & Bin Xue & Qi Zhou & Shiruo Zhang, 2018. "An interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic group decision-making model based on the Choquet integral operator," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 407-424, January.
    9. Sisimonda Kinya Mwanja, 2021. "Effect of operational and market risk exposures on financial performance of DT-Saccos in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(5), pages 107-118, July.
    10. Ivanov, Dmitry & Pavlov, Alexander & Dolgui, Alexandre & Pavlov, Dmitry & Sokolov, Boris, 2016. "Disruption-driven supply chain (re)-planning and performance impact assessment with consideration of pro-active and recovery policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 7-24.
    11. Koen W. de Bock, 2017. "The best of two worlds: Balancing model strength and comprehensibility in business failure prediction using spline-rule ensembles," Post-Print hal-01588059, HAL.
    12. Muhammad Asad ur Rehman Naseer & Muhammad Ashfaq & Sarfraz Hassan & Azhar Abbas & Amar Razzaq & Mubashir Mehdi & Anoma Ariyawardana & Mumtaz Anwar, 2019. "Critical Issues at the Upstream Level in Sustainable Supply Chain Management of Agri-Food Industries: Evidence from Pakistan’s Citrus Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Chih-Yang Tsai, 2017. "The impact of cost structure on supply chain cash flow risk," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6624-6637, November.
    14. Adrian-Cosmin Caraiman, 2020. "The Risk Management in Financing Decisions in Corporate Governance," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 859-865, August.
    15. Afiqah R. Radzi & Rahimi A. Rahman & Saud Almutairi, 2022. "Modeling COVID-19 Impacts and Response Strategies in the Construction Industry: PLS–SEM Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-25, April.
    16. CARAIMAN Adrian, 2020. "The Risk Management Process In Corporate Guvernance," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 189-198, July.
    17. Malek Hamed Alshirah & Azhar Abdul Rahman & Ifa Rizad Mustapa, 2019. "The Role of Foreign Directors in Corporate Risk Disclosure: Empirical Evidence From Jordan," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(4), pages 119-127, July.
    18. Zezhou Wu & Mingyang Jiang & Yuzhu Cai & Hao Wang & Shenghan Li, 2019. "What Hinders the Development of Green Building? An Investigation of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Abdulmalek K. Badraddin & Afiqah R. Radzi & Saud Almutairi & Rahimi A. Rahman, 2022. "Critical Success Factors for Concrete Recycling in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Weskamp, Christoph & Koberstein, Achim & Schwartz, Frank & Suhl, Leena & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "A two-stage stochastic programming approach for identifying optimal postponement strategies in supply chains with uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 123-138.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9537-:d:879597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.