IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p1982-d219562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretive Structural Model Based Factor Analysis of BIM Adoption in Chinese Construction Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Guofeng Ma

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jianyao Jia

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jiyong Ding

    (Institute of Engineering Management, Business School of Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Shanshan Shang

    (School of Business and Management, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Shan Jiang

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

The adoption of Building Information Modeling (BIM) will definitely improve the efficiency and quality of the AEC (architecture, engineering and construction) industry. However, many factors need to be improved before BIM adoption. Based on the interaction between institutions and technology, factors affecting BIM adoption in AEC organizations, within the context of China, are identified and analyzed. Firstly, 21 factors are identified by literature research. Then, an interpretive structural model (ISM) technique is used to establish a hierarchical structure, and matrix impacts cross-reference multiplication applied to a classification (MICMAC) is used for factor classification. The results indicate that corporate/project leadership and software functionality are the two fundamental factors. What’s more, the dynamic mechanism has gradually changed from top-down to a combination of top-down and bottom-up.

Suggested Citation

  • Guofeng Ma & Jianyao Jia & Jiyong Ding & Shanshan Shang & Shan Jiang, 2019. "Interpretive Structural Model Based Factor Analysis of BIM Adoption in Chinese Construction Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1982-:d:219562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1982/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1982/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ansari, Md. Fahim & Kharb, Ravinder Kumar & Luthra, Sunil & Shimmi, S.L. & Chatterji, S., 2013. "Analysis of barriers to implement solar power installations in India using interpretive structural modeling technique," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 163-174.
    2. Pelikan, Pavel, 2003. "Bringing Institutions Into Evolutionary Economics: Another View with Links to Changes in Physical and Social Technologies," Ratio Working Papers 24, The Ratio Institute.
    3. Pavel Pelikan, 2003. "Bringing institutions into evolutionary economics: another view with links to changes in physical and social technologies," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 237-258, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiangang Shi & Kaifeng Duan & Quanwei Xu & Jiajia Li, 2020. "Analysis of Super-Gentrification Dynamic Factors Using Interpretative Structure Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Shelly Gupta & Sanjay Dhingra, 2022. "Modeling the key factors influencing the adoption of mobile financial services: an interpretive structural modeling approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 96-110, June.
    3. Yongliang Deng & Jinyun Li & Qiuting Wu & Shuangshuang Pei & Na Xu & Guodong Ni, 2020. "Using Network Theory to Explore BIM Application Barriers for BIM Sustainable Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Seda Tan & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Muhammed Zubeyr Tel & Merve Serter & Yusuf Berkay Metinal, 2022. "Modeling the Critical Success Factors for BIM Implementation in Developing Countries: Sampling the Turkish AEC Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Na Dong & Yanting Fu & Feng Xiong & Lujie Li & Yibin Ao & Igor Martek, 2019. "Sustainable Construction Project Management (SCPM) Evaluation—A Case Study of the Guangzhou Metro Line-7, PR China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Margarida Pimentel & Amílcar Arantes & Carlos Oliveira Cruz, 2022. "Barriers to the Adoption of Reverse Logistics in the Construction Industry: A Combined ISM and MICMAC Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pelikan, Pavel, 2004. "Interconnecting Ecolutionary, Institutional and Cognitive Economics: Six Steps towards Understanding the Six Links," Ratio Working Papers 48, The Ratio Institute.
    2. Strambach Simone & Klement Benjamin, 2013. "Exploring plasticity in the development path of the automotive industry in Baden-Württemberg: the role of combinatorial knowledge dynamics," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 67-82, October.
    3. Cai-Xia Song & Cui-Xia Qiao, 2023. "Technology Importation, Institutional Environment and Industrial Upgrading: Evidence from China," Journal of Economics / Ekonomicky casopis, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, vol. 71(1), pages 23-45, January.
    4. Stefanović Zoran, 2014. "Evolution Of “Rules Of The Game”, Macroeconomic Dynamics And Reform Policy," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 52(4), pages 480-497, December.
    5. Castelnovo, Paolo & Del Bo, Chiara F. & Florio, Massimo, 2019. "Quality of institutions and productivity of State-Invested Enterprises: International evidence from major telecom companies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 102-117.
    6. Eike W. Schamp, 2010. "On the Notion of Co-evolution in Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Geels, Frank W., 2020. "Micro-foundations of the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions: Developing a multi-dimensional model of agency through crossovers between social constructivism, evolutionary economics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Simone Strambach, 2010. "Path Dependence and Path Plasticity: The Co-evolution of Institutions and Innovation – the German Customized Business Software Industry," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Zweynert, Joachim, 2007. "Die Entstehung ordnungsökonomischer Paradigmen: Theoriegeschichtliche Betrachtungen," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 07/8, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    10. Kapás, Judit & Czeglédi, Pál, 2008. "Technológiai és intézményi változások a munkapiacon és a vállalati szervezetben. Nyugat- és kelet-közép-európai összehasonlítás [Technological and institutional changes on the labour market and in ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 308-332.
    11. Judit KAPà S & Pál CZEGLÉDI, 2007. "What Does Transition Mean?: Post-socialist and Western European Countries Paralleled," The Journal of Comparative Economic Studies (JCES), The Japanese Society for Comparative Economic Studies (JSCES), vol. 3, pages 3-28, December.
    12. Geels, Frank W., 2014. "Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 261-277.
    13. Petr Vymětal & Milan Žák, 2005. "Instituce a výkonnost [Institutions and performance]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2005(4), pages 545-566.
    14. Pelikan, Pavel, 2006. "Markets vs. Government when Rationality Is Unequally Bounded: Some Consequences of Cognitive Inequalities for Theory and Policy," Ratio Working Papers 85, The Ratio Institute, revised 03 Sep 2006.
    15. Kapás, Judit, 2007. "Hogyan fejlődik a vállalat?. A fizikai és a társadalmi technológia kölcsönhatásos evolúciós folyamata [How do firms develop?. The mutual evolutionary process of physical and social technology]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 49-66.
    16. Wohlgemuth, Michael, 2009. "Diagnosen der Moderne: Friedrich A. von Hayek," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 09/9, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    17. Hölzl, Werner, 2006. "Convergence of financial systems: towards an evolutionary perspective," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 67-90, April.
    18. Gerardo Marletto, 2009. "Heterodox Environmental Economix: Theoretical Strands in Search of a Paradigm," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 25-33.
    19. Efendic, Adnan & Pugh, Geoff & Adnett, Nick, 2011. "Institutions and economic performance: A meta-regression analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 586-599, September.
    20. Borella, Sara, 2008. "EU-Migrationspolitik: Bremse statt Motor der Liberalisierung," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 08/10, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1982-:d:219562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.