IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7154-d836214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Applications in Biodiversity Conservation, Managing Forests, and Related Services in India

Author

Listed:
  • Kadukothanahally Nagaraju Shivaprakash

    (The Nature Conservancy Center, 37 Link Road, Lajpatnagar-3, New Delhi 110024, India)

  • Niraj Swami

    (The Nature Conservancy, Arington, VA 22201, USA)

  • Sagar Mysorekar

    (The Nature Conservancy Center, 37 Link Road, Lajpatnagar-3, New Delhi 110024, India)

  • Roshni Arora

    (The Nature Conservancy Center, 37 Link Road, Lajpatnagar-3, New Delhi 110024, India)

  • Aditya Gangadharan

    (The Nature Conservancy Center, 37 Link Road, Lajpatnagar-3, New Delhi 110024, India)

  • Karishma Vohra

    (The Nature Conservancy Center, 37 Link Road, Lajpatnagar-3, New Delhi 110024, India)

  • Madegowda Jadeyegowda

    (College of Forestry, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Ponnampet 571216, India)

  • Joseph M. Kiesecker

    (Global Lands Program, The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA)

Abstract

The recent advancement in data science coupled with the revolution in digital and satellite technology has improved the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the forestry and wildlife sectors. India shares 7% of global forest cover and is the 8th most biodiverse region in the world. However, rapid expansion of developmental projects, agriculture, and urban areas threaten the country’s rich biodiversity. Therefore, the adoption of new technologies like AI in Indian forests and biodiversity sectors can help in effective monitoring, management, and conservation of biodiversity and forest resources. We conducted a systematic search of literature related to the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms (ML) in the forestry sector and biodiversity conservation across globe and in India (using ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar). Additionally, we also collected data on AI-based startups and non-profits in forest and wildlife sectors to understand the growth and adoption of AI technology in biodiversity conservation, forest management, and related services. Here, we first provide a global overview of AI research and application in forestry and biodiversity conservation. Next, we discuss adoption challenges of AI technologies in the Indian forestry and biodiversity sectors. Overall, we find that adoption of AI technology in Indian forestry and biodiversity sectors has been slow compared to developed, and to other developing countries. However, improving access to big data related to forest and biodiversity, cloud computing, and digital and satellite technology can help improve adoption of AI technology in India. We hope that this synthesis will motivate forest officials, scientists, and conservationists in India to explore AI technology for biodiversity conservation and forest management.

Suggested Citation

  • Kadukothanahally Nagaraju Shivaprakash & Niraj Swami & Sagar Mysorekar & Roshni Arora & Aditya Gangadharan & Karishma Vohra & Madegowda Jadeyegowda & Joseph M. Kiesecker, 2022. "Potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Applications in Biodiversity Conservation, Managing Forests, and Related Services in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7154-:d:836214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kocev, Dragi & Naumoski, Andreja & Mitreski, Kosta & Krstić, Svetislav & Džeroski, Sašo, 2010. "Learning habitat models for the diatom community in Lake Prespa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 330-337.
    2. Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Ozgur Kisi & Vahdettin Demir, 2016. "Enhancing Long-Term Streamflow Forecasting and Predicting using Periodicity Data Component: Application of Artificial Intelligence," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(12), pages 4125-4151, September.
    3. Penczak, T. & Głowacki, Ł. & Kruk, A. & Galicka, W., 2012. "Implementation of a self-organizing map for investigation of impoundment impact on fish assemblages in a large, lowland river: Long-term study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 64-71.
    4. Knudby, Anders & Brenning, Alexander & LeDrew, Ellsworth, 2010. "New approaches to modelling fish–habitat relationships," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 503-511.
    5. Lucas N. Joppa, 2017. "The case for technology investments in the environment," Nature, Nature, vol. 552(7685), pages 325-328, December.
    6. Alex Borowicz & Hieu Le & Grant Humphries & Georg Nehls & Caroline Höschle & Vladislav Kosarev & Heather J Lynch, 2019. "Aerial-trained deep learning networks for surveying cetaceans from satellite imagery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Xianming Dou & Yongguo Yang & Jinhui Luo, 2018. "Estimating Forest Carbon Fluxes Using Machine Learning Techniques Based on Eddy Covariance Measurements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Watts, Michael J. & Li, Yuxiao & Russell, Bayden D. & Mellin, Camille & Connell, Sean D. & Fordham, Damien A., 2011. "A novel method for mapping reefs and subtidal rocky habitats using artificial neural networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(15), pages 2606-2614.
    9. Zarkami, Rahmat & Sadeghi, Roghayeh & Goethals, Peter, 2012. "Use of fish distribution modelling for river management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 44-49.
    10. Simon J Pittman & Kerry A Brown, 2011. "Multi-Scale Approach for Predicting Fish Species Distributions across Coral Reef Seascapes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Yiannis Ampatzidis & Luigi De Bellis & Andrea Luvisi, 2017. "iPathology: Robotic Applications and Management of Plants and Plant Diseases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Devis Tuia & Benjamin Kellenberger & Sara Beery & Blair R. Costelloe & Silvia Zuffi & Benjamin Risse & Alexander Mathis & Mackenzie W. Mathis & Frank Langevelde & Tilo Burghardt & Roland Kays & Holger, 2022. "Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Muñoz-Mas, R. & Martínez-Capel, F. & Alcaraz-Hernández, J.D. & Mouton, A.M., 2015. "Can multilayer perceptron ensembles model the ecological niche of freshwater fish species?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 72-81.
    14. Valentin Bellassen & Sebastiaan Luyssaert, 2014. "Carbon sequestration: Managing forests in uncertain times," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7487), pages 153-155, February.
    15. Daniele Silvestro & Stefano Goria & Thomas Sterner & Alexandre Antonelli, 2022. "Improving biodiversity protection through artificial intelligence," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 415-424, May.
    16. Diane A. Isabelle & Mika Westerlund, 2022. "A Review and Categorization of Artificial Intelligence-Based Opportunities in Wildlife, Ocean and Land Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Volf, Goran & Atanasova, Nataša & Kompare, Boris & Precali, Robert & Ožanić, Nevenka, 2011. "Descriptive and prediction models of phytoplankton in the northern Adriatic," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2502-2511.
    18. Beatrice Garske & Antonia Bau & Felix Ekardt, 2021. "Digitalization and AI in European Agriculture: A Strategy for Achieving Climate and Biodiversity Targets?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alex Vinicio Gavilanes Montoya & Danny Daniel Castillo Vizuete & Marina Viorela Marcu, 2023. "Exploring the Role of ICTs and Communication Flows in the Forest Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crisci, C. & Ghattas, B. & Perera, G., 2012. "A review of supervised machine learning algorithms and their applications to ecological data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 113-122.
    2. Akhlaq Amin Wani & Amir Farooq Bhat & Aaasif Ali Gatoo & Shiba Zahoor & Basira Mehraj & Naveed Najam & Qaisar Shafi Wani & M A Islam & Shah Murtaza & Moonisa Aslam Dervash & P K Joshi, 2021. "Assessing relationship of forest biophysical factors with NDVI for carbon management in key coniferous strata of temperate Himalayas," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Marshall, C.E. & Glegg, G.A. & Howell, K.L., 2014. "Species distribution modelling to support marine conservation planning: The next steps," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 330-332.
    4. Martina Šestak & Daniel Copot, 2023. "Towards Trusted Data Sharing and Exchange in Agro-Food Supply Chains: Design Principles for Agricultural Data Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Tao, Hai & Diop, Lamine & Bodian, Ansoumana & Djaman, Koffi & Ndiaye, Papa Malick & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2018. "Reference evapotranspiration prediction using hybridized fuzzy model with firefly algorithm: Regional case study in Burkina Faso," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 140-151.
    6. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    7. Diyamandoglu, Vasil & Fortuna, Lorena M., 2015. "Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 21-30.
    8. Margot Luyckx & Leonie Reins, 2022. "The Future of Farming: The (Non)-Sense of Big Data Predictive Tools for Sustainable EU Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Ayman Issa & Mohammad A. A. Zaid, 2023. "Firm's biodiversity initiatives disclosure and board gender diversity: A multi‐country analysis of corporations operating in Europe," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4991-5007, November.
    10. Metta, Matteo & Ciliberti, Stefano & Obi, Chinedu & Bartolini, Fabio & Klerkx, Laurens & Brunori, Gianluca, 2022. "An integrated socio-cyber-physical system framework to assess responsible digitalisation in agriculture: A first application with Living Labs in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Asitha De Silva & Dilanthi Amaratunga & Richard Haigh, 2022. "Green and Blue Infrastructure as Nature-Based Better Preparedness Solutions for Disaster Risk Reduction: Key Policy Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Shivam Gupta & Jazmin Campos Zeballos & Gema del Río Castro & Ana Tomičić & Sergio Andrés Morales & Maya Mahfouz & Isimemen Osemwegie & Vicky Phemia Comlan Sessi & Marina Schmitz & Nady Mahmoud & Mnen, 2023. "Operationalizing Digitainability: Encouraging Mindfulness to Harness the Power of Digitalization for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-37, April.
    13. Nikola Simidjievski & Ljupčo Todorovski & Sašo Džeroski, 2016. "Modeling Dynamic Systems with Efficient Ensembles of Process-Based Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-27, April.
    14. Fábio Duarte & Ricardo Álvarez, 2019. "The data politics of the urban age," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    15. Babak Mohammadi & Farshad Ahmadi & Saeid Mehdizadeh & Yiqing Guan & Quoc Bao Pham & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh & Doan Quang Tri, 2020. "Developing Novel Robust Models to Improve the Accuracy of Daily Streamflow Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(10), pages 3387-3409, August.
    16. Jean C. Bikomeye & Sima Namin & Chima Anyanwu & Caitlin S. Rublee & Jamie Ferschinger & Ken Leinbach & Patricia Lindquist & August Hoppe & Lawrence Hoffman & Justin Hegarty & Dwayne Sperber & Kirsten , 2021. "Resilience and Equity in a Time of Crises: Investing in Public Urban Greenspace Is Now More Essential Than Ever in the US and Beyond," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-39, August.
    17. Tilman Reinhardt, 2023. "The farm to fork strategy and the digital transformation of the agrifood sector—An assessment from the perspective of innovation systems," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 819-838, June.
    18. Juan F. Fernández-Manjarrés & Paloma Ruiz-Benito & Miguel A. Zavala & J. Julio Camarero & Fernando Pulido & Vânia Proença & Laetitia Navarro & Roxane Sansilvestri & Elena Granda & Laura Marqués & Mart, 2018. "Forest Adaptation to Climate Change along Steep Ecological Gradients: The Case of the Mediterranean-Temperate Transition in South-Western Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.
    19. E. Kahya & F. F. Ozduven & Y. Aslan, 2024. "YOLOv5 Model Application in Real-Time Robotic Eggplant Harvesting," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 1-9, February.
    20. Rana Muhammad Adnan & Andrea Petroselli & Salim Heddam & Celso Augusto Guimarães Santos & Ozgur Kisi, 2021. "Comparison of different methodologies for rainfall–runoff modeling: machine learning vs conceptual approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 2987-3011, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7154-:d:836214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.