IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7013-d833918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Observations of Strategies Used by Secondary School Teachers in Physical Classrooms to Promote Positive Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Mahzan Awang

    (Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Abdul Talib Mohamed Hashim

    (Faculty of Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjung Malim 35900, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Tan Kim Hua

    (Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Abdul Razaq Ahmad

    (Faculty of Education, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Nordin Mamat

    (Faculty of Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjung Malim 35900, Perak, Malaysia)

Abstract

Difficult behaviour in pupils poses a challenge to teachers. Although teachers have been trained to implement various pedagogical strategies, teachers’ spontaneous actions in classrooms may affect pupils’ behaviour. Indeed, teachers may face difficulties in making decisions regarding pupils’ behaviour in the classroom. Therefore, we carried out 12 observations in two schools in Malaysia to analyse a pattern of teachers’ initiatives to promote positive behaviour and discourage negative behaviour in classrooms. The study was carried in two urban national secondary schools located in the capital city of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. We observed pupils’ behaviour in response to strategies used by teachers for carrying out teaching and learning in the first ten minutes of the lessons. All 12 lessons were video-recorded, then analysed by three coders by looking at the frequency of the following targeted behaviours (using a checklist): teachers’ action: encouragement, praise, and guidance; pupils’ behaviour: attentive, uninvolved, initiative, and disruptive; teachers’ response: positive and ignore. The data gathered were analysed using an event-based analysis technique. The results indicate that teachers were more likely to guide pupils in lessons. There was less encouragement and praise used in the classroom. A clear pattern from this study is that pupils were more likely to pay attention when a teacher responded to their action positively. The data also show that ignoring pupils’ negative behaviour increases such behaviour (uninvolved and disruptive). The implications of the study suggest that there should be intensive training to increase teachers’ skills in managing pupils’ behaviour in the classroom. A specific module is suggested to be designed and implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Mahzan Awang & Abdul Talib Mohamed Hashim & Tan Kim Hua & Abdul Razaq Ahmad & Nordin Mamat, 2022. "Observations of Strategies Used by Secondary School Teachers in Physical Classrooms to Promote Positive Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7013-:d:833918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohd Mahzan Awang & Alfitri Alfitri & Abdul Razaq Ahmad & Jalal Deen Careemdeen & Juhari Ahmad, 2022. "Socio-Ecological Support and Physical Facilities Satisfaction: How They Link to Social Participation and Well-Being among Urban Residents in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Karen Van Petegem & Antonia Aelterman & Hilde Van Keer & Yves Rosseel, 2008. "The influence of student characteristics and interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom on student’s wellbeing," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 279-291, January.
    3. Hussien Mohamad Alakrash & Norizan Abdul Razak, 2021. "Technology-Based Language Learning: Investigation of Digital Technology and Digital Literacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Sheng Jia Song & Kim Hua Tan & Mohd Mahzan Awang, 2021. "Generic Digital Equity Model in Education: Mobile-Assisted Personalized Learning (MAPL) through e-Modules," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matilde Bini & Lucio Masserini, 2016. "Students’ Satisfaction and Teaching Efficiency of University Offer," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 847-862, November.
    2. Putra Hilmi Prayitno & Sheerad Sahid & Muhammad Hussin, 2022. "Social Capital and Household Economic Welfare: Do Entrepreneurship, Financial and Digital Literacy Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Vaishnavi S & Ajit I, 2023. "Exploring the Efficacy of Social Media Narrative-Based Activities in Improving Digital Communication Skills and Digital Literacy Among Tertiary-Level ESL Learners," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(7), pages 222-222, September.
    4. Desheng Yan & Guangming Li, 2023. "A Heterogeneity Study on the Effect of Digital Education Technology on the Sustainability of Cognitive Ability for Middle School Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Rajati Mariappan & Kim Hua Tan & Jiaming Yang & Jian Chen & Peng Kee Chang, 2022. "Synthesizing the Attributes of Computer-Based Error Analysis for ESL and EFL Learning: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Dimitri Van Maele & Mieke Van Houtte, 2011. "The Quality of School Life: Teacher-Student Trust Relationships and the Organizational School Context," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 85-100, January.
    7. Ewa Jaska & Agnieszka Werenowska & Agata Balińska, 2022. "Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Behaviors of Generation Z in Poland Stimulated by Mobile Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Cho, Esther Yin-Nei & Chan, T.M.S., 2020. "Children’s wellbeing in a high-stakes testing environment: The case of Hong Kong," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Saira Hossain & Sue O’Neill & Iva Strnadová, 2023. "What Constitutes Student Well-Being: A Scoping Review Of Students’ Perspectives," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(2), pages 447-483, April.
    10. Belinda Lai & Kim Hua Tan & Mengyu He & Nur-Ehsan Mohd Said & Nazri Muslim, 2022. "The Roles of Non-Textual Elements in Sustaining ESL and EFL Learning: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Zhichang Cai & ChengHe Guan & An Trinh & Bo Zhang & Zhibin Chen & Sumeeta Srinivasan & Chris Nielsen, 2022. "Satisfactions on Self-Perceived Health of Urban Residents in Chengdu, China: Gender, Age and the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Valentina Tobia & Andrea Greco & Patrizia Steca & Gian Marco Marzocchi, 2019. "Children’s Wellbeing at School: A Multi-dimensional and Multi-informant Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 841-861, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7013-:d:833918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.