IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p6988-d833551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Safe and Sustainable Autonomous Vehicles Using Environmentally-Friendly Criticality Metrics

Author

Listed:
  • Sorin Liviu Jurj

    (Institute of Systems Engineering for Future Mobility, German Aerospace Center e.V (DLR), Escherweg 2, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Tino Werner

    (Institute of Systems Engineering for Future Mobility, German Aerospace Center e.V (DLR), Escherweg 2, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Dominik Grundt

    (Institute of Systems Engineering for Future Mobility, German Aerospace Center e.V (DLR), Escherweg 2, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Willem Hagemann

    (Institute of Systems Engineering for Future Mobility, German Aerospace Center e.V (DLR), Escherweg 2, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Eike Möhlmann

    (Institute of Systems Engineering for Future Mobility, German Aerospace Center e.V (DLR), Escherweg 2, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of several criticality metrics used for evaluating the safety of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) and also proposes environmentally friendly metrics with the scope of facilitating their selection by future researchers who want to evaluate both the safety and environmental impact of AVs. Regarding this, first, we investigate whether existing criticality metrics are applicable as a reward component in Reinforcement Learning (RL), which is a popular learning framework for training autonomous systems. Second, we propose environmentally friendly metrics that take into consideration the environmental impact by measuring the CO 2 emissions of traditional vehicles as well as measuring the motor power used by electric vehicles. Third, we discuss the usefulness of using criticality metrics for Artificial Intelligence (AI) training. Finally, we apply a selected number of criticality metrics as RL reward component in a simple simulated car-following scenario. More exactly, we applied them together in an RL task, with the objective of learning a policy for following a lead vehicle that suddenly stops at two different opportunities. As demonstrated by our experimental results, this work serves as an example for the research community of applying metrics both as reward components in RL and as measures of the safety and environmental impact of AVs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sorin Liviu Jurj & Tino Werner & Dominik Grundt & Willem Hagemann & Eike Möhlmann, 2022. "Towards Safe and Sustainable Autonomous Vehicles Using Environmentally-Friendly Criticality Metrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-52, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:6988-:d:833551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/6988/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/6988/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ganesh, Akhil Hannegudda & Xu, Bin, 2022. "A review of reinforcement learning based energy management systems for electrified powertrains: Progress, challenge, and potential solution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Bálint Kővári & Lászlo Szőke & Tamás Bécsi & Szilárd Aradi & Péter Gáspár, 2021. "Traffic Signal Control via Reinforcement Learning for Reducing Global Vehicle Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Dimitris Milakis, 2019. "Long-term implications of automated vehicles: an introduction," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 1-8, January.
    4. Carl Johnsson & Aliaksei Laureshyn & Tim De Ceunynck, 2018. "In search of surrogate safety indicators for vulnerable road users: a review of surrogate safety indicators," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 765-785, November.
    5. Wadud, Zia & MacKenzie, Don & Leiby, Paul, 2016. "Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-18.
    6. Peng Jing & Gang Xu & Yuexia Chen & Yuji Shi & Fengping Zhan, 2020. "The Determinants behind the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Sorin Liviu Jurj & Dominik Grundt & Tino Werner & Philipp Borchers & Karina Rothemann & Eike Möhlmann, 2021. "Increasing the Safety of Adaptive Cruise Control Using Physics-Guided Reinforcement Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sorin Liviu Jurj & Tino Werner & Dominik Grundt & Willem Hagemann & Eike Möhlmann, 2023. "Correction: Jurj et al. Towards Safe and Sustainable Autonomous Vehicles Using Environmentally-Friendly Criticality Metrics. Sustainability 2022, 14 , 6988," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shelly Etzioni & Jamil Hamadneh & Arnór B. Elvarsson & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss & Milena Djukanovic & Stelios N. Neophytou & Jaka Sodnik & Amalia Polydoropoulou & Ioannis Tsouros & Cristina Pronello & N, 2020. "Modeling Cross-National Differences in Automated Vehicle Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Pan, Yuchen & Wu, Yu & Xu, Lu & Xia, Chengyi & Olson, David L., 2024. "The impacts of connected autonomous vehicles on mixed traffic flow: A comprehensive review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 635(C).
    3. Ishant Sharma & Sabyasachee Mishra, 2023. "Ranking preferences towards adopting autonomous vehicles based on peer inputs and advertisements," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2139-2192, December.
    4. Du, Manqing & Zhang, Tingru & Liu, Jinting & Xu, Zhigang & Liu, Peng, 2022. "Rumors in the air? Exploring public misconceptions about automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 237-252.
    5. Ljubi, Klara & Groznik, Aleš, 2023. "Role played by social factors and privacy concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Xing, Yingying & Zhou, Huiyu & Han, Xiao & Zhang, Meng & Lu, Jian, 2022. "What influences vulnerable road users’ perceptions of autonomous vehicles? A comparative analysis of the 2017 and 2019 Pittsburgh surveys," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Rubén Cordera & Soledad Nogués & Esther González-González & José Luis Moura, 2021. "Modeling the Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles on Land Use Using a LUTI Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Kolarova, Viktoriya & Steck, Felix & Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J., 2019. "Assessing the effect of autonomous driving on value of travel time savings: A comparison between current and future preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 155-169.
    9. Sumitkumar, Rathor & Al-Sumaiti, Ameena Saad, 2024. "Shared autonomous electric vehicle: Towards social economy of energy and mobility from power-transportation nexus perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Matteo Acquarone & Claudio Maino & Daniela Misul & Ezio Spessa & Antonio Mastropietro & Luca Sorrentino & Enrico Busto, 2023. "Influence of the Reward Function on the Selection of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Hybrid Electric Vehicles Real-Time Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Qian, Lixian & Yin, Juelin & Huang, Youlin & Liang, Ya, 2023. "The role of values and ethics in influencing consumers’ intention to use autonomous vehicle hailing services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Huang, Ruchen & He, Hongwen & Gao, Miaojue, 2023. "Training-efficient and cost-optimal energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus based on a novel distributed deep reinforcement learning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    13. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    14. Karst Geurs & Cathy Macharis, 2019. "The future of European communication and transportation research: a research agenda," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 6, pages 1-21.
    15. Xu Kuang & Fuquan Zhao & Han Hao & Zongwei Liu, 2019. "Assessing the Socioeconomic Impacts of Intelligent Connected Vehicles in China: A Cost–Benefit Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-28, June.
    16. Dubey, Subodh & Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Cats, Oded & Bansal, Prateek, 2022. "A General Framework to Forecast the Adoption of Novel Products: A Case of Autonomous Vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 63-95.
    17. Dulebenets, Maxim A. & Ozguven, Eren Erman & Moses, Ren, 2018. "The Highway Beautification Act: Towards improving efficiency of the Federal Outdoor Advertising Control Program," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 88-106.
    18. Liliana Andrei & Oana Luca & Florian Gaman, 2022. "Insights from User Preferences on Automated Vehicles: Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors on Value of Time in Romania Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Jia Guo & Yusak Susilo & Constantinos Antoniou & Anna Pernestål Brenden, 2020. "Influence of Individual Perceptions on the Decision to Adopt Automated Bus Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Yuche Chen & Ruixiao Sun & Xuanke Wu, 2021. "Estimating Bounds of Aerodynamic, Mass, and Auxiliary Load Impacts on Autonomous Vehicles: A Powertrain Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:6988-:d:833551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.