IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6586-d826024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Free Early Childhood Education a Sustainable Solution? Evidence from the Case Study of Nanjing

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Qian

    (Department of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Xiurong Gu

    (Department of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Hui Li

    (Shanghai Institute of Early Childhood Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
    Macquarie School of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

Abstract

This case study adopted a mixed methods approach to understanding how and why the free early childhood education (ECE) policy in Nanjing, China, was formulated, implemented, and failed, using the “policy cycle” framework. Many countries have implemented the free ECE policy to solve affordability and accessibility problems without considering policy sustainability; thus, they have to discontinue the policy. Nanjing is no exception. Altogether 232 kindergarten principals and teaching/research staff were randomly sampled and surveyed, and 5 kindergarten principals and 5 teaching/researcher staff were interviewed. The results indicated that there were many obstacles to the policy’s sustainability, including conflict of interest, inefficient policy implementation, insufficient funding, and more social inequality issues. Additionally, the policymakers made mistakes in the five domains of the policy cycle: the context of influence, the context of policy text production, the context of practice, the context of outcomes, and the context of political strategy. Finally, the three important lessons for a more sustainable policy decision process are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Qian & Xiurong Gu & Hui Li, 2022. "Is Free Early Childhood Education a Sustainable Solution? Evidence from the Case Study of Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6586-:d:826024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Hui & Lu, Jiaqing, 2018. "Legislation for early childhood education: A case study of China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 32-41.
    2. Zhou, Yu & Jiang, Yong & Zheng, Chuchu & Li, Hui, 2020. "Is puhui kindergarten a panacea for the ‘3A’ problems of early childhood education in China? Evidence from a national validation study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Isabelle Bouchard & Lydia Cheung & Gail Pacheco, 2021. "Evaluating the impact of 20 hours free early childhood education on mothers’ labour force participation and earnings," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 188-202, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Wanni & Wang, Ge & Li, Shaoping & Guo, Yuhe & Tang, Yalin & Li, Mingyuan & Liu, Chengfang & Chen, Chevin, 2021. "Development Challenges and Preschool Education in China," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315365, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Thomas Benison & Isabelle Sin, 2024. "The wage cost of a lack of access to affordable childcare in Aotearoa New Zealand," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(1), pages 40-73, January.
    3. Wei Wang & Luyao Liang & Jing Luo & Hui Li & Jing Tang, 2022. "Early Childhood Teachers’ Fertility Willingness under China’s ‘Third-Child’ Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Zhe Zhan & Anjing Fan, 2022. "How to Promote Quality and Equity of Early Childhood Education for Sustainable Development in Undeveloped Rural Areas of China: An Evolutionary Game Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Xinxin Liu & Yong Jiang & Hui Li, 2022. "The Sustainability of Early Childhood Education in Chinese Teachers’ Perspective: Evidence from a National Validation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Hong, Xiumin & Zhu, Wenting & Wu, Dandan & Li, Hui, 2020. "Parental satisfaction with early childhood education services in rural China: A national survey," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6586-:d:826024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.