IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3414-d520376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Calculation and Operations Research in Terms of LNG Carriage by Water Transport: A Case Study of the Port of Bratislava

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Jurkovič

    (Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Žilina, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Tomáš Kalina

    (Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Žilina, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Ondrej Stopka

    (Faculty of Technology, Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, 370 01 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Piotr Gorzelanczyk

    (Department of Transport, Stanislaw Staszic University of Applied Sciences in Piła, 64-920 Piła, Poland)

  • Borna Abramović

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

The presented manuscript discusses a specific research study examining several variants of liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriage from chosen seaports to the port of Bratislava using the Danube waterway, assessing them using chosen multi-criteria analysis techniques. Two ports in Turkey and one port in Georgia are deemed export terminals. A total of twelve variants are compared, whereby the comparison is carried out based on multiple evaluation criteria defined by a panel of experts who laid particular stress on their importance. An economic calculation is performed in the first phase to assess LNG carriage in all the variants. This represents the very foundation for the multi-criteria evaluation, which is conducted using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The evaluated variants differ not only in terms of export port location, but also in relation to transport technology. As for the second phase, four distinct technologies in three different scenarios are assessed—specifically, Small-Scale (SS) LNG-C tankers—while two modes of operation (i.e., time-charter, own tanker) and a river-sea LNG tanker with an LNG barge in two versions are considered. The first version considers the use of Marine Gasoil (MGO) fuel, while the second one considers LNG use. The results obtained provide interesting findings, wherein two out of three applied methods prefer the same transport option. Thus, it can be stated that our study presents a unique approach by comparing different scenarios of LNG distribution as a commodity inland along the river Danube, specifically to Central Europe, from a variety of standpoints. The manuscript evaluates carriage using traditional MGO fuels as well as alternative LNG fuels, and also brings a comparison from a technological point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Jurkovič & Tomáš Kalina & Ondrej Stopka & Piotr Gorzelanczyk & Borna Abramović, 2021. "Economic Calculation and Operations Research in Terms of LNG Carriage by Water Transport: A Case Study of the Port of Bratislava," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3414-:d:520376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henrik Andersson & Marielle Christiansen & Guy Desaulniers, 2016. "A new decomposition algorithm for a liquefied natural gas inventory routing problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 564-578, January.
    2. Vladimír Konečný & Jozef Gnap & Tomáš Settey & František Petro & Tomáš Skrúcaný & Tomasz Figlus, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability of the Vehicle Fleet Change in Public City Transport of Selected City in Central Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Dorigoni, Susanna & Portatadino, Sergio, 2008. "LNG development across Europe: Infrastructural and regulatory analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 3366-3373, September.
    4. Pfoser, Sarah & Schauer, Oliver & Costa, Yasel, 2018. "Acceptance of LNG as an alternative fuel: Determinants and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 259-267.
    5. J. Magnier, Hamza & Jrad, Asmaa, 2019. "A minimal simplified model for assessing and devising global LNG equilibrium trade portfolios while maximizing energy security," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1221-1233.
    6. Sesini, Marzia & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam D., 2020. "The impact of liquefied natural gas and storage on the EU natural gas infrastructure resilience," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Bittante, A. & Pettersson, F. & Saxén, H., 2018. "Optimization of a small-scale LNG supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 79-89.
    8. Alvarez, Jose A. Lopez & Buijs, Paul & Deluster, Rogier & Coelho, Leandro C. & Ursavas, Evrim, 2020. "Strategic and operational decision-making in expanding supply chains for LNG as a fuel," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Yoo, Byeong-Yong, 2017. "Economic assessment of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a marine fuel for CO2 carriers compared to marine gas oil (MGO)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 772-780.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Mako & Andrej Dávid & Patrik Böhm & Sorin Savu, 2021. "Sustainable Transport in the Danube Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Elena Plotnikova & Milita Vienažindienė & Stasys Slavinskas, 2022. "Development of Inland Waterway Transport as a Key to Ensure Sustainability: A Case Study of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladimír Hönig & Petr Prochazka & Michal Obergruber & Luboš Smutka & Viera Kučerová, 2019. "Economic and Technological Analysis of Commercial LNG Production in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Corrado Schenone & Federico Silenzi & Luca A. Tagliafico, 2021. "Dynamic Modelling of LNG Powered Combined Energy Systems in Port Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Perez, Fernando & Al Ghafri, Saif Z.S. & Gallagher, Liam & Siahvashi, Arman & Ryu, Yonghee & Kim, Sungwoo & Kim, Sung Gyu & Johns, Michael L. & May, Eric F., 2021. "Measurements of boil-off gas and stratification in cryogenic liquid nitrogen with implications for the storage and transport of liquefied natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Bilgili, Levent, 2021. "Comparative assessment of alternative marine fuels in life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Konstantina Peloriadi & Petros Iliadis & Panagiotis Boutikos & Konstantinos Atsonios & Panagiotis Grammelis & Aristeidis Nikolopoulos, 2022. "Technoeconomic Assessment of LNG-Fueled Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in Small Island Systems: The Patmos Island Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    7. A. Mor & M. G. Speranza, 2020. "Vehicle routing problems over time: a survey," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 129-149, June.
    8. Lixian Fan & Bingmei Gu, 2019. "Impacts of the Increasingly Strict Sulfur Limit on Compliance Option Choices: The Case Study of Chinese SECA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Jinxi Zhou & Junling Zhang & Guoxian Jiang & Kai Xie, 2024. "Using DPF to Control Particulate Matter Emissions from Ships to Ensure the Sustainable Development of the Shipping Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Zhaoming Yang & Qi Xiang & Yuxuan He & Shiliang Peng & Michael Havbro Faber & Enrico Zio & Lili Zuo & Huai Su & Jinjun Zhang, 2023. "Resilience of Natural Gas Pipeline System: A Review and Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Kuk, Edyta & Małkus, Bartłomiej & Kuk, Michał, 2020. "Small-scale LNG Market Optimization – Intelligent Distribution Network," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2020), Virtual Conference, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Virtual Conference, 10-12 September 2020, pages 522-530, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    12. Trivyza, Nikoletta L. & Rentizelas, Athanasios & Theotokatos, Gerasimos, 2019. "Impact of carbon pricing on the cruise ship energy systems optimal configuration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 952-966.
    13. Kian-Guan Lim & Michelle Lim, 2020. "Financial performance of shipping firms that increase LNG carriers and the support of eco-innovation," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Giovanni Gaetano Gianetti & Tommaso Lucchini & Gianluca D’Errico & Angelo Onorati & Patrik Soltic, 2023. "Development and Validation of a CFD Combustion Model for Natural Gas Engines Operating with Different Piston Bowls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Paweł Pistelok & Daniel Štraub, 2021. "Evaluation of the Road Policy in the Light of Vision Zero in Jaworzno, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Yoo, Byeong-Yong, 2017. "The development and comparison of CO2 BOG re-liquefaction processes for LNG fueled CO2 carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 186-197.
    17. Ahmed, Shoaib & Li, Tie & Yi, Ping & Chen, Run, 2023. "Environmental impact assessment of green ammonia-powered very large tanker ship for decarbonized future shipping operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. Kohnert, Dirk, 2023. "Perspectives d'exportation de GNL et d'hydrogène de l'Afrique subsaharienne vers l'UE [Prospects for LNG and Hydrogen Export from Sub-Saharan Africa to the EU]," MPRA Paper 119420, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Michels, Marius & Bonke, Vanessa & Wever, Hendrik & Musshoff, Oliver, 2024. "Understanding farmers' intention to buy alternative fuel tractors in German agriculture applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Gnap Jozef & Dočkalik Marek & Dydkowski Grzegorz, 2021. "Examination of the Development of New Bus Registrations with Alternative Powertrains in Europe," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 147-158, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3414-:d:520376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.