IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i2p971-d1036544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of a CFD Combustion Model for Natural Gas Engines Operating with Different Piston Bowls

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Gaetano Gianetti

    (ICE Group—Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Tommaso Lucchini

    (ICE Group—Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Gianluca D’Errico

    (ICE Group—Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Angelo Onorati

    (ICE Group—Politecnico di Milano, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Patrik Soltic

    (Empa Automotive Powertrain Technologies, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland)

Abstract

Nowadays, an accurate and precise description of the combustion phase is essential in spark-ignition (SI) engines to drastically reduce pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and increase thermal efficiency. To this end, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can be used to study the different phenomena involved, such as the ignition of the charge, combustion development, and pollutant formation. In this work, a validation of a CFD methodology based on the flame area model (FAM) was carried out to model the combustion process in light-duty SI engines fueled with natural gas. A simplified spherical kernel approach was used to model the ignition phase, whereas turbulent flame propagation was described through two variables. A zero-dimensional evolution of the flame kernel radius was used in combination with the Herweg and Maly formulation to take the laminar-to-turbulent flame transition into account. To estimate the chemical composition of burnt gas, two different approaches were considered—one was based on tabulated kinetics, and the other was based on chemical equilibrium. Assessment of the combustion model was first performed by using different operating points of a light-duty SI engine fueled with natural gas and by using the original piston. The results were validated by using experimental data on the in-cylinder pressure, apparent heat release rate, and pollutant emissions. Afterward, two other different piston bowl geometries were investigated to study the main differences between one solution and the others. The results showed that no important improvements in terms of combustion efficiency were obtained by using the new piston bowl shapes, which was mainly due to the very low ( + 4 % ) or null increase in turbulent kinetic energy during the compression stroke and due to the higher heat losses ( + 20 % ) associated with the increased surface area of the new piston geometries.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Gaetano Gianetti & Tommaso Lucchini & Gianluca D’Errico & Angelo Onorati & Patrik Soltic, 2023. "Development and Validation of a CFD Combustion Model for Natural Gas Engines Operating with Different Piston Bowls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:971-:d:1036544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pfoser, Sarah & Schauer, Oliver & Costa, Yasel, 2018. "Acceptance of LNG as an alternative fuel: Determinants and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 259-267.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konstantina Peloriadi & Petros Iliadis & Panagiotis Boutikos & Konstantinos Atsonios & Panagiotis Grammelis & Aristeidis Nikolopoulos, 2022. "Technoeconomic Assessment of LNG-Fueled Solid Oxide Fuel Cells in Small Island Systems: The Patmos Island Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Vladimír Hönig & Petr Prochazka & Michal Obergruber & Luboš Smutka & Viera Kučerová, 2019. "Economic and Technological Analysis of Commercial LNG Production in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Michels, Marius & Bonke, Vanessa & Wever, Hendrik & Musshoff, Oliver, 2024. "Understanding farmers' intention to buy alternative fuel tractors in German agriculture applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Atienza-Márquez, Antonio & Bruno, Joan Carles & Akisawa, Atsushi & Coronas, Alberto, 2019. "Performance analysis of a combined cold and power (CCP) system with exergy recovery from LNG-regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 448-461.
    5. Davide Borelli & Francesco Devia & Corrado Schenone & Federico Silenzi & Luca A. Tagliafico, 2021. "Dynamic Modelling of LNG Powered Combined Energy Systems in Port Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Martin Jurkovič & Tomáš Kalina & Ondrej Stopka & Piotr Gorzelanczyk & Borna Abramović, 2021. "Economic Calculation and Operations Research in Terms of LNG Carriage by Water Transport: A Case Study of the Port of Bratislava," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Wang, Jinggai & Zhong, Meisu & Wang, Tianni & Ge, Ying-En, 2023. "Identifying industry-related opinions on shore power from a survey in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 65-81.
    8. Ecer, Fatih, 2021. "A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Bai, Shengxi & Liu, Chunhua, 2021. "Overview of energy harvesting and emission reduction technologies in hybrid electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Sun, Shouheng & Ertz, Myriam, 2022. "Life cycle assessment and risk assessment of liquefied natural gas vehicles promotion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Bae, Youngeun & Rindt, Craig R. & Mitra, Suman Kumar & Ritchie, Stephen G., 2024. "Fleet operator perspectives on alternative fuels for heavy-duty vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 36-48.
    12. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Gastaldi, Massimo & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "RES-T trajectories and an integrated SWOT-AHP analysis for biomethane. Policy implications to support a green revolution in European transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Siahvashi, Arman & Al Ghafri, Saif Z.S. & Yang, Xiaoxian & Rowland, Darren & May, Eric F., 2021. "Avoiding costly LNG plant freeze-out-induced shutdowns: Measurement and modelling for neopentane solubility at LNG conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    14. Karolina Godzisz & Maciej Dzikuć & Piotr Kułyk & Arkadiusz Piwowar & Piotr Kuryło & Szymon Szufa, 2021. "Selected Determinants of Sustainable Transport in the Context of the Development of a Low-Carbon Economy in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Ivan Smajla & Daria Karasalihović Sedlar & Branko Drljača & Lucija Jukić, 2019. "Fuel Switch to LNG in Heavy Truck Traffic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Gi-Young Chae & Seung-Hyun An & Chul-Yong Lee, 2021. "Demand Forecasting for Liquified Natural Gas Bunkering by Country and Region Using Meta-Analysis and Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Anchal Gupta & Rajesh Kumar Singh & Sachin Kr Mangla, 2022. "Evaluation of logistics providers for sustainable service quality: Analytics based decision making framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1617-1664, August.
    18. Alejandro Ortega & Konstantinos Gkoumas & Anastasios Tsakalidis & Ferenc Pekár, 2021. "Low-Emission Alternative Energy for Transport in the EU: State of Play of Research and Innovation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Perez, Fernando & Al Ghafri, Saif Z.S. & Gallagher, Liam & Siahvashi, Arman & Ryu, Yonghee & Kim, Sungwoo & Kim, Sung Gyu & Johns, Michael L. & May, Eric F., 2021. "Measurements of boil-off gas and stratification in cryogenic liquid nitrogen with implications for the storage and transport of liquefied natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:971-:d:1036544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.