IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2901-d512565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Education for the Future? Challenges and Implications for Education and Pedagogy in the 21st Century

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Marouli

    (Deree—The American College of Greece, 6 Gravias Street, GR-153 42 Aghia Paraskevi, Greece)

Abstract

The crises societies face today contribute to a rather challenging life setting that demands in-depth reflection, daring new thinking, and change urgently. Transformative education for a sustainable future is needed today more than ever before; the aim of this paper is an exploration of its goal and pedagogy. By drawing on diverse bodies of knowledge, including the structure-agency debate and the theory of critical pedagogy, this paper critically discusses Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and its goal of sustainable development. It identifies areas where ESD needs enhancement given the present socio-economic and cultural context and ultimately proposes the transformation of ESD to Education for Eco-communities—which highlights the need for community-centered approaches, knowledge, and observation of natural laws, sociological imagination, and political acumen—to render it better suited for the challenges of the 21st century.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Marouli, 2021. "Sustainability Education for the Future? Challenges and Implications for Education and Pedagogy in the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2901-:d:512565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2901/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2901/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William A. H. Scott & Stephen R. Gough, 2010. "Sustainability, Learning and Capability: Exploring Questions of Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Dietz, Simon & Neumayer, Eric, 2007. "Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 617-626, March.
    3. Sun, Yifeng, 2018. "Liberal Arts Education and the Modern University," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 272-284, May.
    4. Klitgaard, Kent A. & Krall, Lisi, 2012. "Ecological economics, degrowth, and institutional change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 247-253.
    5. Jessica K. Breadsell & Christine Eon & Gregory M. Morrison, 2019. "Understanding Resource Consumption in the Home, Community and Society through Behaviour and Social Practice Theories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Christina Marouli & Quentin Duroy, 2019. "Reflections on the Transformative Power of Environmental Education in Contemporary Societies: Experience from Two College Courses in Greece and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Macarena Esteban Ibáñez & Isabel Victoria Lucena Cid & Luis Vicente Amador Muñoz & Francisco Mateos Claros, 2020. "Environmental Education, an Essential Instrument to Implement the Sustainable Development Goals in the University Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Macarena Esteban Ibáñez & Daniel Musitu Ferrer & Luis Vicente Amador Muñoz & Francisco Mateos Claros & Francisco Javier Olmedo Ruiz, 2020. "University as Change Manager of Attitudes towards Environment (The Importance of Environmental Education)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agne Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene & Ingrida Lagzdinyte-Budnike & Lina Gaiziuniene & Vilma Sukacke & Laura Daniuseviciute-Brazaite, 2022. "Assessing Education for Sustainable Development in Engineering Study Programs: A Case of AI Ecosystem Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Sungjoo Park & Dayoun Lim, 2022. "Applicability of Olympic Values in Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Hilal Uğraş & Mustafa Uğraş & Stamatios Papadakis & Michail Kalogiannakis, 2024. "ChatGPT-Supported Education in Primary Schools: The Potential of ChatGPT for Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Marit Heldal & Trond Løge Hagen & Ingvild Olsen Olaussen & Gry Mette D. Haugen, 2021. "Social Sustainable Education in a Refugee Camp," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Vassilios Makrakis, 2024. "Teachers’ Resilience Scale for Sustainability Enabled by ICT/Metaverse Learning Technologies: Factorial Structure, Reliability, and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Juan José Leiva-Olivencia & Maria Carmen López-Berlanga & Antonio Miñán Espigares & Francisco Villegas Lirola, 2021. "Compulsory Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Resources, Extracurricular Activities and Inclusive Pedagogical Training in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Miguel Moctezuma Teresa & José Luis Aparicio López & Columba Rodríguez Alviso & Herlinda Gervacio Jiménez & Rosa María Brito Carmona, 2022. "Environmental Competencies for Sustainability: A Training Experience with High School Teachers in a Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Fremstad, Anders & Paul, Mark, 2022. "Neoliberalism and climate change: How the free-market myth has prevented climate action," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Diana Tuomasjukka & Staffan Berg & Marcus Lindner, 2013. "Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Paul Ofei-Manu & Satoshi Shimano, 2012. "In Transition towards Sustainability: Bridging the Business and Education Sectors of Regional Centre of Expertise Greater Sendai Using Education for Sustainable Development-Based Social Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(7), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Van de Kerk, Geurt & Manuel, Arthur R., 2008. "A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI -- the Sustainable Society Index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 228-242, June.
    6. Berthold, Anne & Cologna, Viktoria & Siegrist, Michael, 2022. "The influence of scarcity perception on people's pro-environmental behavior and their readiness to accept new sustainable technologies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Pezzey, John C.V. & Burke, Paul J., 2014. "Towards a more inclusive and precautionary indicator of global sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 141-154.
    8. Silvio Franco & Barbara Pancino & Angelo Martella, 2021. "Mapping National Environmental Sustainability Distribution by Ecological Footprint: The Case of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Gowdy, John & Krall, Lisi, 2013. "The ultrasocial origin of the Anthropocene," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 137-147.
    10. Hoff, Jens V. & Rasmussen, Martin M.B. & Sørensen, Peter Birch, 2021. "Barriers and opportunities in developing and implementing a Green GDP," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    11. Zhicheng Lai & Lei Li & Zhuomin Tao & Tao Li & Xiaoting Shi & Jialing Li & Xin Li, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance from the Perspective of Strong Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Alan Randall, 2022. "Driving with Eyes on the Rear-View Mirror—Why Weak Sustainability Is Not Enough," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Bonifazi, Alessandro & Rega, Carlo & Torre, Carmelo Maria, 2008. "Evaluation and the environmental democracy of cities: Strategic Environmental Assessment of urban plans in Italy," MPRA Paper 11055, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Olivier E. Malay, 2021. "How to Articulate Beyond GDP and Businesses’ Social and Environmental Indicators?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Comte, Adrien & Sylvie Campagne, C. & Lange, Sabine & Bruzón, Adrián García & Hein, Lars & Santos-Martín, Fernando & Levrel, Harold, 2022. "Ecosystem accounting: Past scientific developments and future challenges," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    16. van Wee, Bert & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "COVID-19 and its long-term effects on activity participation and travel behaviour: A multiperspective view," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Luiz Fernando Rodrigues Pinto & Glória de Fátima Pereira Venturini & Salvatore Digiesi & Francesco Facchini & Geraldo Cardoso de Oliveira Neto, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment in Manufacturing under a Strong Sustainability Perspective—An Ecological Neutrality Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-40, November.
    18. Kajsa Borgnäs, 2017. "Indicators as ‘circular argumentation constructs’? An input–output analysis of the variable structure of five environmental sustainability country rankings," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 769-790, June.
    19. Elisa Biagetti & Barbara Pancino & Angelo Martella & Ilenia Maria La Porta & Clara Cicatiello & Tommaso De Gregorio & Silvio Franco, 2023. "Is Hazelnut Farming Sustainable? An Analysis in the Specialized Production Area of Viterbo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-10, July.
    20. Simona-Roxana Ulman & Costica Mihai & Cristina Cautisanu, 2020. "Peculiarities of the Relation between Human and Environmental Wellbeing in Different Stages of National Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2901-:d:512565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.