IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p583-d477587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examination of the Sustainable Rural Tourism Potential of the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina Using a Fuzzy Approach Based on Group Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Adis Puška

    (Institute for Scientific Research and Development, Brcko District BiH, Bulevara mira 30, 76120 Brčko, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Dragan Pamucar

    (Department of Logistics, Military Academy, University of Defence in Belgrade, Pavla Jurišića Šturma 33, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Ilija Stojanović

    (College of Business Studies, Al Ghurair University, Dubai P.O. Box 37374, UAE)

  • Fausto Cavallaro

    (Department of Economics, University of Molise, Via De Sanctis, 86100 Campobasso, Italy)

  • Arturas Kaklauskas

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10221 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Abbas Mardani

    (Department of Marketing, Muma College of Business, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33813, USA)

Abstract

Tourism is an economic activity with great contribution for the development of many countries. To develop rural areas, tourism is especially important and need to be improved in these areas. The Government of Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina has decided to have tourism improvement as one of main objectives in their development strategy focusing on better conditions for development of tourism. Investments in tourism should be applied to the entire area of the Brčko District. Since Brčko District mainly consists of rural areas, it is necessary to invest in rural tourism. The first step of this study was to determine the tourist potential of rural areas. The determination of rural tourist potential in Brčko District was carried out with the assistance of the Brčko District Government. For this purpose, the method of expert decision-making was used, and three experts were selected who evaluated six rural settlements. To obtain results based on expert evaluation, two multi-criteria methods were used: the Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) for determining the importance of criteria and the fuzzy Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to the COmpromise Solution (MARCOS) method to rank rural settlements in terms of their tourism potential. The results showed that the settlement of Bijela has the best rural tourist potential, while the settlement of Grbavica has the least potential. The results obtained by applying this model showed how rural tourism in Brčko District can be improved. The research model for testing the tourism potential has shown good results and can be applied in other branches of tourism with some adaptation to certain branches of tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Adis Puška & Dragan Pamucar & Ilija Stojanović & Fausto Cavallaro & Arturas Kaklauskas & Abbas Mardani, 2021. "Examination of the Sustainable Rural Tourism Potential of the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina Using a Fuzzy Approach Based on Group Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:583-:d:477587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/583/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/583/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Chen & Zhen-feng Cheng & Gyu-Bae Kim, 2020. "Make It Memorable: Tourism Experience, Fun, Recommendation and Revisit Intentions of Chinese Outbound Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Huang, Jen-Hung & Peng, Kua-Hsin, 2012. "Fuzzy Rasch model in TOPSIS: A new approach for generating fuzzy numbers to assess the competitiveness of the tourism industries in Asian countries," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 456-465.
    3. Ngoc Anh Bui & Kiattipoom Kiatkawsin, 2020. "Examining Vietnamese Hard-Adventure Tourists’ Visit Intention Using an Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Alexander Trukhachev, 2015. "Methodology for Evaluating the Rural Tourism Potentials: A Tool to Ensure Sustainable Development of Rural Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Zhang, Hong & Gu, Chao-lin & Gu, Lu-wen & Zhang, Yan, 2011. "The evaluation of tourism destination competitiveness by TOPSIS & information entropy – A case in the Yangtze River Delta of China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 443-451.
    6. María de la Cruz del Río-Rama & Claudia Patricia Maldonado-Erazo & José Álvarez-García & Amador Durán-Sánchez, 2020. "Cultural and Natural Resources in Tourism Island: Bibliometric Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, January.
    7. Michał Roman & Monika Roman & Piotr Prus, 2020. "Innovations in Agritourism: Evidence from a Region in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Zach, Florian J. & Hill, T.L., 2017. "Network, knowledge and relationship impacts on innovation in tourism destinations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-207.
    9. Holbrook, Morris B., 2006. "Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 714-725, June.
    10. Hwang, JaeHee & Lee, SeongWoo, 2015. "The effect of the rural tourism policy on non-farm income in South Korea," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 501-513.
    11. Alexander W. Bartik & Marianne Bertrand & Zoë B. Cullen & Edward L. Glaeser & Michael Luca & Christopher T. Stanton, 2020. "How Are Small Businesses Adjusting to COVID-19? Early Evidence from a Survey," NBER Working Papers 26989, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Michał Roman & Monika Roman & Piotr Prus & Małgorzata Szczepanek, 2020. "Tourism Competitiveness of Rural Areas: Evidence from a Region in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Gao, Jing & Wu, Bihu, 2017. "Revitalizing traditional villages through rural tourism: A case study of Yuanjia Village, Shaanxi Province, China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 223-233.
    14. Iulia C. Muresan & Camelia F. Oroian & Rezhen Harun & Felix H. Arion & Andra Porutiu & Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Alexandru Todea & Ramona Lile, 2016. "Local Residents’ Attitude toward Sustainable Rural Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Shu-Hsien Chang & R. J. Hernández-Díaz & Wei-Shuo Lo, 2020. "The Impact of Low-Carbon Service Operations on Responsible Tourist Behavior: The Psychological Processes of Sustainable Cultural Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José María López-Sanz & Azucena Penelas-Leguía & Pablo Gutiérrez-Rodríguez & Pedro Cuesta-Valiño, 2021. "Sustainable Development and Consumer Behavior in Rural Tourism—The Importance of Image and Loyalty for Host Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Gema Ramírez-Guerrero & Javier García-Onetti & Manuel Arcila-Garrido & Juan Adolfo Chica-Ruiz, 2021. "A Tourism Potential Index for Cultural Heritage Management through the Ecosystem Services Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Hana Ayadi & Nadia Hamani & Lyes Kermad & Mounir Benaissa, 2021. "Novel Fuzzy Composite Indicators for Locating a Logistics Platform under Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-37, April.
    4. Gangmin Weng & Yue Pan & Jianpu Li, 2021. "Study on the Influencing Factors and Acting Path of the Sustainable Development of Rural Tourism Based on EEAM-ISM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Canan Cengiz & Şükran Şahin & Bülent Cengiz & Mükerrem Bahar Başkır & Pelin Keçecioğlu Dağlı, 2021. "Evaluation of the Visitor Understanding of Coastal Geotourism and Geoheritage Potential Based on Sustainable Regional Development in Western Black Sea Region, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    6. Yuying Chen & Yajie Li & Xiangfeng Gu & Nan Chen & Qing Yuan & Ming Yan, 2021. "Evaluation of Tourism Development Potential on Provinces along the Belt and Road in China: Generation of a Comprehensive Index System," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Gladys Maquera & Bruno B. F. da Costa & Óscar Mendoza & Raúl A. Salinas & Assed N. Haddad, 2022. "Intelligent Digital Platform for Community-Based Rural Tourism—A Novel Concept Development in Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Adis Puška & Anđelka Štilić & Miroslav Nedeljković & Aleksandar Maksimović, 2022. "Dex-Based Evaluation of Sustainable Rural Tourism in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wookhyun An & Silverio Alarcón, 2020. "How Can Rural Tourism Be Sustainable? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Tie Wang & Wei Wang & Zhongjun Wu & Ching-Hui Su & Ming-Hsiang Chen, 2019. "Understanding Farm Households’ Participation in Nong Jia Le in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Gabriela Popescu & Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Ioan Brad & Elena Peț & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2022. "Sustainability through Rural Tourism in Moieciu Area-Development Analysis and Future Proposals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Juan Carlos Martin, 2017. "Regional Spanish Tourism Competitiveness. A DEA-MONITUR approach," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 4, pages 153-173.
    6. Nevena Ćurčić & Andrijana Mirković Svitlica & Jovana Brankov & Željko Bjeljac & Sanja Pavlović & Bojana Jandžiković, 2021. "The Role of Rural Tourism in Strengthening the Sustainability of Rural Areas: The Case of Zlakusa Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Yugang He & Xiaodan Gao & Renhong Wu & Yinhui Wang & Baek-Ryul Choi, 2021. "How Does Sustainable Rural Tourism Cause Rural Community Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Rajesh Kumar Srivastava & Vijai Kumar Gupta, 2023. "Recent Progress and Future Perspectives for Zero Agriculture Waste Technologies: Pineapple Waste as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Michał Roman & Piotr Grudzień, 2021. "The Essence of Agritourism and Its Profitability during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Nanping Feng & Fenfen Wei & Kevin H. Zhang & Dongxiao Gu, 2018. "Innovating Rural Tourism Targeting Poverty Alleviation through a Multi-Industries Integration Network: the Case of Zhuanshui Village, Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Michał Roman & Josef Abrham & Arkadiusz Niedziółka & Ewa Szczucka & Lubos Smutka & Piotr Prus, 2022. "Tourist Attractiveness of Rural Areas as a Determinant of the Implementation of Social Tourism of Disadvantaged Groups: Evidence from Poland and the Czech Republic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Andreea M. Crăciun & Ștefan Dezsi & Florin Pop & Pintea Cecilia, 2022. "Rural Tourism—Viable Alternatives for Preserving Local Specificity and Sustainable Socio-Economic Development: Case Study—“Valley of the Kings” (Gurghiului Valley, Mureș County, Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-31, December.
    13. Martina Zámková & Stanislav Rojík & Ladislav Pilař & Martina Chalupová & Martin Prokop & Radek Stolín & Paweł Dziekański & Mansoor Maitah, 2021. "Customer Preferences for Organic Agriculture Produce in the Czech Republic: 2016 and 2019," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Gordana Radović & Marko D. Petrović & Dunja Demirović Bajrami & Milan Radovanović & Natalia Vuković, 2020. "Can Proper Funding Enhance Sustainable Tourism in Rural Settings? Evidence from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Gladys Maquera & Bruno B. F. da Costa & Óscar Mendoza & Raúl A. Salinas & Assed N. Haddad, 2022. "Intelligent Digital Platform for Community-Based Rural Tourism—A Novel Concept Development in Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Nafiah Ariyani & Akhmad Fauzi, 2023. "Pathways toward the Transformation of Sustainable Rural Tourism Management in Central Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Li, Yuxin & Yao, Zili & Guo, Zhanfeng, 2023. "Willingness to pay and preferences for rural tourism attributes among urban residents: A discrete choice experiment in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 460-471.
    18. Ye Tan & Pingan Xiang & Shuning Liu & Liang Yu, 2023. "Evaluating provincial tourism competitiveness in China: an empirical application based on the EM-MGM-SNA model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 506-527, January.
    19. Maryam Mahmoodi & Michał Roman & Piotr Prus, 2022. "Features and Challenges of Agritourism: Evidence from Iran and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    20. José Alberto Martínez-González & Vidina Tais Díaz-Padilla & Eduardo Parra-López, 2021. "Study of the Tourism Competitiveness Model of the World Economic Forum Using Rasch’s Mathematical Model: The Case of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:583-:d:477587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.