IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12081-d670080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective Perceptions and Their Characteristics of Middle School Students Regarding the Effectiveness of the “0th Period Physical Education Class” in South Korea: The Q Methodology Application

Author

Listed:
  • Wonjae Jeon

    (Department of Senior Sports Course, Daegu Haany University, Gyeongsan-si 38610, Korea)

  • Goomyeung Kwon

    (Department of Senior Sports Course, Daegu Haany University, Gyeongsan-si 38610, Korea)

  • Kihong Joung

    (Department of Continuing Education Center and Physical Education, Kangnam University, Yongin-si 16979, Korea)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the subjective perception types and characteristics of Korean middle school students regarding participation in the “0th period physical education class”, a class involving physical movement that takes place before the start of regular school classes in the morning. This goal was achieved by applying the Q methodology, which can categorize the subjective viewpoints of research participants. The selection of the final 25 Q-samples was done by composing the Q-population. Twenty middle school students were selected as the P-sample, and Q-sorting was performed on them. The PQ method program (version 2.35) was used to perform centroid factor analysis and varimax rotation. The study presented five types with a total variance of 87%. Types 1 to 5 (N = 4, 4, 4, 5, and 3) pertained to a potent means of enhancing lesson concentration and academic performance, efficient activities to improve physical ability and a healthy body image in adolescence, the motivating power behind a stable school life and sociability development, building an upright character and successful changes in daily life, and raising awareness of the importance of participating in sports and the importance of physical activity, with eigenvalues (EVs) of 3.89, 4.48, 3.96, 5.16, and 2.58, respectively, and explanatory variances of 0.10, 0.22, 0.13, 0.33, and 0.09, respectively. Moreover, consensus statements for each factor were demonstrated as being Q24 and Q25. The findings in this study supported the academic foundation for the official introduction and activation of “0th period physical education classes” in the Korean education community for the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Wonjae Jeon & Goomyeung Kwon & Kihong Joung, 2021. "Subjective Perceptions and Their Characteristics of Middle School Students Regarding the Effectiveness of the “0th Period Physical Education Class” in South Korea: The Q Methodology Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12081-:d:670080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12081/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12081/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimberly Petrovic, 2017. "The Benefits of Taekwondo Training for Undergraduate Students: A Phenomenological Study," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Baker, Rachel Mairi, 2006. "Economic rationality and health and lifestyle choices for people with diabetes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2341-2353, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wonseok Choi & Wonjae Jeon, 2022. "A Study on the Subjectivity of Parents Regarding “0th-Period Physical Education Class” of Middle Schools in Korea Using Q-Methodology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wonjae Jeon & Seunghyun Jang & Kihong Joung, 2021. "Subjective Perceptions of South Korean Parents Regarding the Effectiveness of Taekwondo Education for Adolescents and Its Characteristics: The Q Methodology Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Dorota Ortenburger & Dariusz Mosler & Józef Langfort & Jacek Wąsik, 2022. "Feeling of Meaningfulness and Anxiety of Taekwon-Do Fighters in a Salutogenic Notion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-8, November.
    3. Coast, Joanna, 2018. "A history that goes hand in hand: Reflections on the development of health economics and the role played by Social Science & Medicine, 1967–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 227-232.
    4. Ming Lu & Alin Lin & Jiyi Sun, 2018. "The Impact of Photovoltaic Applications on Urban Landscapes Based on Visual Q Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Yu-Jin Kim & Seung-Hui Baek & Jong-Beom Park & Sang-Hwan Choi & Jae-Don Lee & Sang-Seok Nam, 2021. "The Psychosocial Effects of Taekwondo Training: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Factor, Roni & Kawachi, Ichiro & Williams, David R., 2011. "Understanding high-risk behavior among non-dominant minorities: A social resistance framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1292-1301.
    7. Christel Protiére & Rachel Baker & Dominique Genre & Anthony Goncalves & Patrice Viens, 2017. "Marketing Authorization Procedures for Advanced Cancer Drugs: Exploring the Views of Patients, Oncologists, Healthcare Decision Makers, and Citizens in France," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(5), pages 555-566, July.
    8. N. Exel & G. Graaf & P. Rietveld, 2011. "“I can do perfectly well without a car!”," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 383-407, May.
    9. Yongseop Kim & Junhyoung Kim & Jung-Min Lee & Dong-Chul Seo & Hyun Chul Jung, 2022. "Intergenerational Taekwondo Program: A Narrative Review and Practical Intervention Proposal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Hempel, Corinna & Will, Sabine & Zander, Katrin, 2019. "Societal Perspectives on a Bio‐economy in Germany: An Explorative Study Using Q Methodology," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(01), January.
    11. Wonseok Choi & Wonjae Jeon, 2022. "A Study on the Subjectivity of Parents Regarding “0th-Period Physical Education Class” of Middle Schools in Korea Using Q-Methodology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.
    12. Abdelmotaleb Kadri & Maamer Slimani & Nicola Luigi Bragazzi & David Tod & Fairouz Azaiez, 2019. "Effect of Taekwondo Practice on Cognitive Function in Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-10, January.
    13. van Exel, Job & Baker, Rachel & Mason, Helen & Donaldson, Cam & Brouwer, Werner, 2015. "Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 128-137.
    14. Rachel Baker & John Wildman & Helen Mason & Cam Donaldson, 2014. "Q‐Ing For Health—A New Approach To Eliciting The Public'S Views On Health Care Resource Allocation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 283-297, March.
    15. James Sumberg & Thomas Yeboah & Justin Flynn & Nana Akua Anyidoho, 2017. "Young people’s perspectives on farming in Ghana: a Q study," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(1), pages 151-161, February.
    16. Chen Fang & Liwen Chen, 2019. "Exploring the Entrepreneurial Intentions of Science and Engineering Students in China: A Q Methodology Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Ryan, Mandy & Kinghorn, Philip & Entwistle, Vikki A. & Francis, Jill J., 2014. "Valuing patients' experiences of healthcare processes: Towards broader applications of existing methods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 194-203.
    18. Thomas Yeboah & James Sumberg & Justin Flynn & Nana Akua Anyidoho, 2017. "Perspectives on Desirable Work: Findings from a Q Study with Students and Parents in Rural Ghana," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(2), pages 423-440, April.
    19. Yong-Kuk Lee & Su-Youn Cho & Hee-Tae Roh, 2021. "Effects of 16 Weeks of Taekwondo Training on the Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity, Circulating Neurotransmitters, and Subjective Well-Being of Obese Postmenopausal Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.
    20. Foster, Michele M. & Earl, Peter E. & Haines, Terry P. & Mitchell, Geoffrey K., 2010. "Unravelling the concept of consumer preference: Implications for health policy and optimal planning in primary care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(2-3), pages 105-112, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12081-:d:670080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.